Features of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages in areas of meadow biocenosis with and without Sosnovsky’s hogweed (Heracleum sosnowskyi)
Keywords:
species richness, Belarusian Lakeland, stratobionts boreholes, eurytopic species, forest speciesAbstract
As a result of a study conducted in 2018, 41 species of ground beetles from 23 genera were identified in the Ushachsky District of the Vitebsk Region (Belarusian Lakeland) as a part of ground beetle assemblages of meadow biocenosis with clogging by the invasive Sosnovsky’s hogweed, whereas without clogging with hogweed 38 species from 21 genera were identified. Species Notiophilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1779), Dyschiriodes globosus (Herbst, 1784), Bembidion quadrimaculatum (Linnaeus, 1761), Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (Fabricius, 1787), P. minor (Gyllenhal, 1827), P. nigrita (Paykull, 1790), Platynus assimilis (Paykull, 1790), P. krynickii (Sperk, 1835), Bradycellus caucasicus (Chaudoir, 1846), Ophonus laticollis (Mannerheim, 1825), Harpalus latus (Linnaeus, 1758), H. progrediens (Schauberger, 1922), Badister bullatus (Schrank, 1798) were recorded only in the biocenosis with clogging with hogweed. The species richness and the value of the biodiversity index of the ground beetle assemblages of the meadow biocenosis with clogging with hogweed were higher than these parameters of the ground beetle assemblages of the meadow biocenosis without hogweed. In the conditions of invasive hogweed thickets stratobionts boreholes dominated in the ground beetle assemblages (relative abundance 28.57 %), the participation of eurytopic (6 species, 20.37 %) and forest species (7 species, 12.01 %) was high, with a decrease in the share of participation meadow species (3 species, 1.37 %). For the biocenosis littered with hogweed, a high proportion of mesophiles (19 species, 52.44 %) was observed, against the background of a low proportion of mesogyrophils (9 species, 37.69 %).
References
- Jahodová Š, Trybush S, Pyšek P, Wade M, Karp A. Invasive species of Heracleum in Europe: an insight into genetic relationships and invasion history. Diversity and Distributions. 2007;13(1):99–114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00305.x.
- Laman NA, Prokhorov VN, Maslovskii OM. Gigantskie borshcheviki – opasnye invazivnye vidy dlya prirodnykh kompleksov i naseleniya Belarusi [Giant hogweed – dangerous invasive species for natural complexes and the population of Belarus]. Parfenov VI, editor. Minsk: Institute of Experimental Botany named after V. F. Kuprevich of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus; 2009. 40 p. Russian.
- Esipenko LP. [Biological invasions as a global environmental problem in the South of Russia]. The South of Russia: ecology, development. 2012;7(4):21–25. Russian. DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2012-4-21-25.
- Tovstik EV, Shirokikh AA, Shirokikh IG. [Microbiological condition of soils under invasive thickets of Sosnowski hogweed (Heracleum sosnowskyi)]. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii. 2018;2.2:5–8. Russian.
- Vysotski YuI. Analysis of cow-bream invasion on the territory of Liozno District of Vitebsk Region. Vesnik Vicebskaga dzjarzhawnaga wniversitjeta. 2017;4:48–53. Russian.
- Vysotski YuI. Analysis of the spread of hogweed invasion on the territory of Orsha District of Vitebsk Region. Vesnik Vicebskaga dzjarzhawnaga wniversitjeta. 2019;2:28–35. Russian.
- Lövei GL, Sunderland KD. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology. 1996;41:231–256. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001311.
- Hartley DJ, Koivula MJ, Spence JR, Pelletier R, Ball GE. Effects of urbanization on ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of grassland habitats in western Canada. Ecography. 2007;30(5):673–684. DOI: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05199.x.
- Sushko G. Spatial distribution of epigeic beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) in the «Yelnia» peat bog. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology. 2014;14(2):151–161.
- Clarke KR. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology. 1993;18(1):117−143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x.
- Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical ecology. 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998. 853 p.
- Renkonen О. Statisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestrische Käferwelt der finnischen Bruchmoore. Annales Zoologici Societatis Zoologicæ-Botanicæ Fennicæ Vanamo. 1938;6:1–231.
- Gorodkov KB. Ranges types of insects of tundra and forests zones of European part of USSR. In: Arealy nasekomykh evropeiskoi chasti SSSR. Karty 179–221 [Insect habitats of the European part of the USSR. Maps 179–221]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1984. p. 3–20. Russian.
- Solodovnikov IA. Zhuzhelitsy (Coleoptera, Sarabidae) Belorusskogo Poozer’ya. S katalogom vidov zhuzhelits Belarusi i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv [Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Belarusian Lake District. With a catalog of species of ground beetles of Belarus and neighboring states]. Vitebsk: Vitebsk State University named after P. M. Masherov; 2008. 325 p. Russian.
- Löbl I, Löbl D, editors. Сatalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 1. Archostemata – Myxophaga – Adephaga. Revised and updated edition. Leiden: Brill; 2017. XXXIV, 1443 p.
- Sharova IСh. Life forms of carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Moscow: Nauka; 1981. 360 p. Russian.
- Bel’gard AL. Stepnoe lesovedenie [Steppe forestry]. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost’; 1971. 336 p. Russian.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)










