Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of plants resistance to oxidative stress under peptide elicitor AtPep1

Authors

  • Halina G. Filiptsova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-8175
  • Vladimir M. Yurin Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

peptide elicitor AtPep1, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase
Supporting Agencies
This work was supported by state program for scientific research «Chemical technologies and materials», subprogram «Bioregulators of plants».

Abstract

The effect of the peptide elicitor AtPep1 on the resistance of soybean and pea plants to oxidative stress was studied. The concentration of the peptide 10– 9 mol/L has the maximum elicitor effect on these plants. It was shown that treatment of the aerial part of seedlings with this peptide leads to an increase in the activity of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase and a decrease in the level of lipid peroxidation products in plants under oxidative stress. Revealed effects cause an increase in the plants resistance to stress.

Author Biographies

  • Halina G. Filiptsova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (biology), docent; associate professor at the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Vladimir M. Yurin, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (biology), full professor; professor at the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

References

  1. Yamaguchi Y, Huffaker A. Endogenous peptide elicitors in higher plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2011;14(4):351–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.001.
  2. Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pa­ttern-recognition receptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2009;60:379–406. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346.
  3. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444(7117):323–329. DOI: 10.1038/nature05286.
  4. Albert M. Peptides as triggers of plant defence. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2013;64(17):5269–5279. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert275.
  5. Huffaker A, Ryan CA. Endogenous peptide defense signals in Arabidopsis differentially amplify signaling for the innate immune response. PNAS. 2007;104(25):10732–10736. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703343104.
  6. Lori M, van Verk MC, Hander T, Schatowitz H, Klauser D, Flury P, et al. Evolutionary divergence of the plant elicitor peptides (Peps) and their receptors: interfamily incompatibility of perception but compatibility of downstream signaling. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(17):5315–5325. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv236.
  7. Filiptsova HG. The role of endogenous peptide elicitors in plant resistance to biotic stress. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Biology. 2019;2:3–12. Russian.
  8. Chirkova TV. Fiziologicheskie osnovy ustoichivosti rastenii [Physiological foundations of plant resistance]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta; 2002. 244 p. Russian.
  9. Bartels S, Boller T. Quo vadis, Pep? Plant elicitor peptides at the crossroads of immunity, stress, and development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(17):5183–5193. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv180.
  10. Yi Ma, Yichen Zhao, Walker RK, Berkowitz GA. Molecular steps in the immune signaling pathway evoked by plant elicitor peptides: Ca2+-dependent protein kinases, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species are downstream from the early Ca2+ signal. Plant Physiology. 2013;163(3):1459–1471. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.226068.
  11. Sokolov YA, Filiptsova HG, Lushchyk AY, Yurin VM. Synthesis and analysis of the influence of some peptide elicitors on resistance of legumes to oxidative stress. In: Zhabinskii V, Khripach V, Khripach N, editors. Chemistry, structure and functions of biomolecules. 6 th International conference; 2018 May 22–25; Minsk, Belarus. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2018. p. 172–174.
  12. Paranich LI, Paranich AV, Vasilenko NM, Bugai EV. [The effect of nitrobenzene and its chlorine derivatives on some indicators of antioxidant homeostasis]. Byulleten’ eksperimental’noi biologii i meditsiny. 1993;116(10):402–405. Russian.
  13. Dikalov SI, Harrison DG. Methods for detection of mitochondrial and cellular reactive oxygen species. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2014;20(2):372–382. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2012.4886.
  14. Tret’yakov NN, editor. Praktikum po fiziologii rastenii [Workshop on plant physiology]. 3rd edition. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1990. 271 p. Russian.
  15. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence of higher plants. Plant Physiology. 1977;59(2):309–314. DOI: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309.
  16. Choudhury S, Panda P, Sahoo L, Panda SK. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signa­ling & Behavior. 2013;8(4):e23681. DOI: 10.4161/psb.23681.
  17. Meyer A, Pühler A, Niehaus K. The lipopolysaccharides of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris induce an oxidative burst reaction in cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum. Planta. 2001;213(2):214–222. DOI: 10.1007/s004250000493.
  18. Yi Ma, Walker RK, Yichen Zhao, Berkowitz GA. Linking ligand perception by PEPR pattern recognition receptors to cytosolic Ca2+ elevation and downstream immune signaling in plants. PNAS. 2012;109(48):19852–19857. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205448109.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Filiptsova, . H. G., & Yurin, V. M. (2021). Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of plants resistance to oxidative stress under peptide elicitor AtPep1. Experimental Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-1722-2021-3-38-46