Species diversity of epigeal spider assemblages (Araneae) in coniferous forests in the north of Belarus
Keywords:
spiders, Araneae, species diversity, taxonomic structure, reserve, coniferous forests, BelarusAbstract
The article presents materials on the species composition and taxonomic structure of epigeal spider assemblages in coniferous forests on the territory of republican landscape reserves «Osveisky», «Krasny Bor» and «Sinsha» (Vitebsk Region) in the late spring – early summer period. A total of 95 species of spiders were recorded. In the reserve «Osveisky», 38 species were found, in the reserve «Krasny Bor» – 73 species, and in the reserve «Sinsha» – 61 species. In different biotopes, 38–55 species were identified. Depending on the habitat, Trochosa terricola, Tapinocyba pallens, Pocadicnemis pumila, Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata, Alopecosa taeniata, Agroeca brunnea, Walckenaeria cucullata, Xysticus obscurus and Trochosa spinipalpis dominated. Analysis of beta-diversity showed significant differences in the species composition of spiders, which were more similar in the wetter pine forests, as well as in the pine forests of the reserve «Sinsha».
References
- Canals M, Veloso C, Solís R. Adaptation of the spiders to the environment: the case of some Chilean species. Frontiers in Physiology. 2015;6:220. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00220.
- Nentwig W. The prey of spiders. In: Nentwig W, editor. Ecophysiology of spiders. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987. p. 249–263. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71552-5_18.
- Nyffeler M. Prey selection of spiders in the field. The Journal of Arachnology. 1999;27(1):317–324.
- McGeogh MA. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biological Reviews. 1998;73(2):181–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00029.x.
- Мержвинский ЛМ, Пиловец ГИ, Михеева ТМ, Становая ЮЛ, Колмаков ПЮ, Яцына АП и др. Биологическое разнообразие Белорусского Поозерья. Мержвинский ЛМ, редактор. Витебск: Витебский государственный университет имени П. М. Машерова; 2011. 413 с.
- Шляхтенок АС. Фаунистические комплексы пауков на пойменных лугах с различным типом хозяйственного использования. В: Сущеня ЛМ, Арзамасов ИТ, Безденежных ВА, Вязович ЮА, Галковская ГА, Долбик МС и др., редакторы. Биологические основы освоения, реконструкции и охраны животного мира Белоруссии. Тезисы докладов 5-й зоологической конференции; 20–21 декабря 1983 г.; Минск, Беларусь. Минск: Наука и техника; 1983. с. 83–84.
- Приставко ВП, Жуковец ЕМ. Пауки (Aranei) как объект экологического мониторинга в Березинском заповеднике. Энтомологическое обозрение. 1987;66(1):184–189.
- Shavanova T. The spider fauna (Arachnida: Aranei) in various types of pine forests in the Berezinsky State Biosphere Reserve, Belarus. In: Růžička V, editor. Proceedings of the 15th European colloquium of arachnology; 1994 July 11–15; České Budějovice, Czech Republic. České Budějovice: Institute of Entomology; 1995. p. 162–168.
- Лобанок ПИ, составитель. Заповедные территории Беларуси. Минск: Беларуская энцыклапедыя імя Петруся Броўкі; 2008. 416 с.
- Левы СВ, рэдактар. Тэрыторыi, важныя для птушак у Беларусi. Мiнск: Рыфтур-прынт; 2015. 152 с.
- Renkonen O. Statistisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestrische Käferwelt der finnischen Bruchmoore. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicæ-Botanicæ Fennicæ Vanamo. 1938;6(1):1–231.
- R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.3 [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022 [cited 2023 June 14]. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/.
- Федосенко ЕИ. Структура и сезонная динамика видового разнообразия пауков в сосняках черничных и мшистых заказника «Прибужское Полесье». Известия Национальной академии наук Беларуси. Серия биологических наук. 2022;67(1):84–90. DOI: 10.29235/1029-8940-2022-67-1-84-90.
- Олигер ТИ. Пауки юго-восточного Приладожья. К 30-летию Нижне-Свирского государственного природного заповедника. Марусик ЮМ, редактор. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета; 2010. 341 с. (Труды Санкт-Петербургского общества естествоиспытателей. Серия 4; том 89).
- Rėlys V, Dapkus D. Similarities between epigeic spider communities in a peatbog and surrounding pine forest: a study from southern Lithuania. In: Toft S, Scharff N, editors. European arachnology – 2000. Proceedings of the 19 th European colloquium of arachnology; 2000 July 17–22; Aarhus, Denmark. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press; 2002. p. 207–214.
- Biteniekytė M, Rėlys V. Epigeic spider communities of a peat bog and adjacent habitats. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. 2007;15:81–87.
- Woźny M. Wpływ wilgotności podłoża na zgrupowania pająków oraz dynamika liczebności gatunków dominujących borów sosnowych Wzgórz Ostrzeczowskich. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Prace Zoologiczne. 1992;23:25–82.
- Karpiński J. Pająki (Araneida) w biocenozie Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Roczniki Nauk Leśnych. 1956;14:163–200.
- Ahtiainen JJ, Alatalo RV, Kotiaho JS, Mappes J, Parri S, Vertainen L. Sexual selection in the drumming wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofaciata. In: Toft S, Scharff N, editors. European arachnology – 2000. Proceedings of the 19 th European colloquium of arachnology; 2000 July 17–22; Aarhus, Denmark. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press; 2002. p. 129–137.
- Koponen S. Ground-living spiders in bogs in northern Europe. The Journal of Arachnology. 2002;30(2):262–267. DOI: 10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0262:GLSIBI]2.0.CO;2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)










