Growth characteristics of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings in peat-pearlite substrates enriched with organic and mineral controlled-release fertilisers

Authors

  • Veronika E. Artishevskaya Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Antonina Yu. Shashko Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Alexander A. Ovsey Republican Forest Selection and Seed Centre, Р-1 Highway, 17 th kilometre, Valkovichy 223049, Shchomyslicki village council, Minsk District, Belarus
  • Renata S. Nedelko Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Uladzislau Yu. Bandarenka Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Maryia A. Charnysh Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Palina V. Hryvusevich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Oksana G. Yakovets Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Nikolai A. Laman V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 27 Akademichnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus
  • Anatoliy I. Sokolik Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Vadim V. Demidchik V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 27 Akademichnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus

Keywords:

soil substrate, controlled-release fertiliser, Scots pine, European spruce, conifer seedlings, growth and development of higher plants

Abstract

In the presented work, the effect of different compositions of peat-pearlite substrates on the growth of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) and Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. (European spruce) seedlings were tested in standard containers (limited space for root system development) during one growing season. As components of soil substrates, long-lasting encapsulated controlled-release fertilisers (CRF) «Basacote» and «Top Substra», water-soluble specialised fertiliser for peat enrichment «PG mix», zeolite-based CRF «ZION», organic fertilisers «Organicum» (dry sterilised chicken manure) and «Biohumus» (vermiculture-based compost), as well as rottenstone (tripoli), vermiculite and flax shives were examined. It was demonstrated that at the early stage of growth (42 days), European spruce seedlings showed a faster increase in shoot length on substrates with the organic additive «Organicum» (chicken manure). At the later stages of the tested vegetation period (56 – 91 days), European spruce seedlings showed the most intensive growth on substrates with the addition of CRF «Basacote» (capsules containing macro- and microelements covered with an inorganic polymer membrane). For Scots pine, the best growth rates both in early and late vegetation periods (42– 91 days) were found on substrates containing a specialised fertiliser for peat enrichment «PG mix» (without liming; pH 2.7–3.2). The introduction of such fertilisers, as «Top Substra», «ZION» and «Biohumus» into peat substrates had a smaller effect on stimulation of growth as compared to fertilisers «Basacote», «Organicum» and «PG mix». This study also found the correlations between the saturation of the soil electrolyte content (electrical conductivity test), pH and growth parameters; the digital phenotyping of young spruce and pine plants was also carried out.

Author Biographies

  • Veronika E. Artishevskaya, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    competitor at the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Antonina Yu. Shashko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    junior researcher at the laboratory of plant physiology and biotechnology, department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Alexander A. Ovsey, Republican Forest Selection and Seed Centre, Р-1 Highway, 17 th kilometre, Valkovichy 223049, Shchomyslicki village council, Minsk District, Belarus

    deputy director, head of the research department

  • Renata S. Nedelko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    student at the faculty of biology

  • Uladzislau Yu. Bandarenka, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    senior lecturer at the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Maryia A. Charnysh, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    head of the training laboratory of plant bioengineering and landscape design, faculty of biology

  • Palina V. Hryvusevich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (biology); associate professor at the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Oksana G. Yakovets, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (biology), docent; head of the department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Nikolai A. Laman, V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 27 Akademichnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    doctor of science (biology), academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, full professor; head of the laboratory of plant growth and development

  • Anatoliy I. Sokolik, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (biology), docent; head of the laboratory of plant physiology and biotechnology, department of plant cell biology and bioengineering, faculty of biology

  • Vadim V. Demidchik, V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 27 Akademichnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    doctor of science (biology), сorresponding member of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, full professor; chief researcher at the laboratory of plant growth and development

References

  1. Rodríguez SM, Ordás RJ, Alvarez JM. Conifer biotechnology: an overview. Forests. 2022;13(7):1061. DOI: 10.3390/f13071061.
  2. Малашевич ДГ, Дашкевич ЕА. Лесное хозяйство Республики Беларусь: современное состояние и стратегические направления развития. Актуальные проблемы лесного комплекса. 2016;46:31–35. EDN: WZXJJV.
  3. Лапицкая ОВ. Проблемы управления лесным хозяйством Беларуси с целью перспективной организации производства. Вестник Гомельского государственного технического университета имени П. О. Сухого. 2021;3:36–43. EDN: YSTCQB.
  4. Лебедев ЕВ. Минеральное питание и биологическая продуктивность основных лесообразующих пород Беларуси в онтогенезе. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экология и безопасность жизнедеятельности. 2013;3:23–29. EDN: RCCTVX.
  5. Толкач ИВ, Кравченко ОВ, Ожич ОС, Таркан АВ, Ильючик МА. Закономерности изменчивости спектральных яркостей полога основных лесообразующих пород Беларуси на снимках сканера ADS100. Труды БГТУ. Серия 1, Лесное хозяйство, природопользование и переработка возобновляемых ресурсов. 2017;2:43–49. EDN: YMIEBH.
  6. Clyde D. Genomic insights into conifer evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2022;23(3):136. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00452-1.
  7. Якимов НИ, Крук НК, Юреня АВ. Агротехника выращивания сеянцев сосны обыкновенной в условиях закрытого грунта. Труды БГТУ. Серия 1, Лесное хозяйство, природопользование и переработка возобновляемых ресурсов. 2018;1:25–30. EDN: GKROCQ.
  8. Якимов НИ, Крук НК, Юреня АВ. Оценка показателей роста саженцев ели европейской в уплотненной школе. Труды БГТУ. Серия 1, Лесное хозяйство, природопользование и переработка возобновляемых ресурсов. 2017;1:50–54. EDN: ZWBYWZ.
  9. Чернобровкина НП, Чернышенко ОВ, Егорова АВ, Зайцева МИ, Робонен ЕВ. Современные технологии выращивания посадочного материала хвойных пород и пути их совершенствования. Лесной вестник. 2016;20(6):6–14. EDN: WDWUWY.
  10. Мухортов ДИ, Антропова АВ. Рост и развитие сеянцев сосны обыкновенной в контейнерах при использовании субстратов различной плотности сложения. В: Курбанов ЭА, Барталев СА, Чумаченко СИ, Хлюстов ВК, Воробьев ОН, Терехин ЭА и др., редакторы. Лесные экосистемы в условиях изменения климата: биологическая продуктивность и дистанционный мониторинг. Выпуск 5. Йошкар-Ола: Поволжский государственный технологический университет; 2019. с. 42–53. DOI: 10.25686/2675.2019.5.58815.
  11. Schmilewski G. The role of peat in assuring the quality of growing media. Mires and Peat. 2008;3:02. DOI: 10.19189/001c.128252.
  12. Томсон АЭ, Наумова ГВ. Торф и продукты его переработки. Минск: Беларуская навука; 2009. 328 с.
  13. Melo CA, de Oliveira LK, Goveia D, Fraceto LF, Rosa AH. Enrichment of tropical peat with micronutrients for agricultural applications: evaluation of adsorption and desorption processes. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2014;25(1):36–49. DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130265.
  14. Asadu CO, Ezema CA, Ekwueme BN, Onu CE, Onoh IM, Adejon T, et al. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers: overview of production methods, materials used, nutrients release mechanisms, benefits and considerations. Environmental Pollution and Management. 2024;1:32–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.epm.2024.07.002.
  15. Зайцева МИ, Робонен ЕВ, Чернобровкина НП. Использование порубочных остатков для приготовления торфяных субстратов при выращивании сеянцев сосны обыкновенной с закрытой корневой системой. Лесной вестник. 2010;1:4–8. EDN: KYOKZB.
  16. Мухортов ДИ, Романов ЕМ. Утилизация органических отходов при искусственном лесовосстановлении. Вестник Поволжского государственного технологического университета. Серия: Лес. Экология. Природопользование. 2013;3:20–35. EDN: RCKOMJ.
  17. Lemaire F, Dartigues A, Rivière LM. Physical and chemical characteristics of a ligno-cellulosic material. In: Maher MJ, editor. Symposium on substrates in horticulture other than soils in situ; 1988 September 12–16; Dublin, Ireland. [S. l.]: International Society for Horticultural Science; 1989. p. 9–22 (Acta horticulturae; number 238). DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.238.1.
  18. Тебенькова ДН, Лукина НВ, Воробьев РА, Орлова МА. Всхожесть семян и биометрические параметры сеянцев на субстратах из твердых отходов целлюлозно-бумажной промышленности. Лесоведение. 2014;6:31–40. EDN: TEUWUT.
  19. Dovzhenko AP, Yapryntseva OA, Sinyashin KO, Doolotkeldieva T, Zairov RR. Recent progress in the development of encapsulated fertilizers for time-controlled release. Heliyon. 2024;10(15):e34895. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34895.
  20. Редько ГИ, Огиевский ДВ, Наквасина ЕН, Романов ЕМ. Биоэкологические основы выращивания сеянцев сосны и ели в питомниках. Москва: Лесная промышленность; 1983. 64 с.
  21. Demidchik V, Shabala S, Isayenkov S, Cuin TA, Pottosin I. Calcium transport across plant membranes: mechanisms and functions. New Phytologist. 2018;220(1):49–69. DOI: 10.1111/nph.15266.
  22. Pallant E, Riha SJ. Surface soil acidification under red pine and Norway spruce. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1990;54(4):1124–1130. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400040034x.
  23. Grossnickle SC. Ecophysiology of Northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. Ottawa: NRC Research Press; 2000. XII, 407 p.
  24. Oliet J, Planelles R, Segura ML, Artero F, Jacobs DF. Mineral nutrition and growth of containerized Pinus halepensis seedlings under controlled-release fertilizer. Scientia Horticulturae. 2004;103(1):113–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.019.
  25. Hakkarainen A, Kasanen E, Puttonen V. Foreign exchange risk management: evidence from Finland. Managerial Finance. 1997;23(7):25–44. DOI: 10.1108/eb018633.
  26. Birchler T, Rose RW, Royo A, Pardos M. La planta ideal: revisión del concepto, parámetros definitorios e implementación práctica. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales. 1998;7(1–2):109–121.
  27. Timmer VR, Aidelbaum AS. Manual for exponential nutrient loading of seedlings to improve outplanting performance on competitive forest sites. Sault Ste. Marie: Great Lakes Forestry Centre; 1996. 29 p. Report No.: TR-25.
  28. Priya E, Sarkar S, Maji PK. A review on slow-release fertilizer: nutrient release mechanism and agricultural sustainability. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2024;12(4):113211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.113211.
  29. Kaakinen S, Jolkkonen A, Iivonen S, Vapaavuori E. Growth, allocation and tissue chemistry of Picea abies seedlings affected by nutrient supply during the second growing season. Tree Physiology. 2004;24(6):707–719. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.6.707.
  30. Huett DO, Gogel BJ. Longevities and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium release patterns of polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers at 30 °C and 40 °C. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2000;31(7–8):959–973. DOI: 10.1080/00103620009370490.
  31. Fu Y, Oliet JA, Li G, Wang J. Effect of controlled release fertilizer type and rate on mineral nutrients, non-structural carbohydrates, and field performance of Chinese pine container-grown seedlings. Silva Fennica. 2017;51(2):1607. DOI: 10.14214/sf.1607.
  32. Benson RB. Fertilizer technology. In: Haase DL, Rose R, editors. Forest seedling nutrition from the nursery to the field. Proceedings of the symposium; 1997 October 28–29; Corvallis, USA. Corvallis: Nursery Technology Cooperative, Oregon State University; 1997. p. 5–9.
  33. Reddell P, Gordon V, Hopkins MS. Ectomycorrhizas in Eucalyptus tetrodonta and E. miniata forest communities in tropical northern Australia and their role in the rehabilitation of these forests following mining. Australian Journal of Botany. 1999;47(6):881–907. DOI: 10.1071/bt97126.
  34. Landis TD, Dumroese RK. Using organic fertilizers in forest and native plant nurseries. In: Haase DL, Pinto JR, Riley LE, technical coordinators. National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations – 2011. Fort Collins: Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service; 2012. p. 45–52 (USDA Forest Service proceedings; RMRS-P-68).
  35. Schuch UK, Mahato TR, Subramani J, Martin EC. Response of desert-adapted landscape trees to deficit irrigation. In: Snyder RL, Ortega-Farias S, Carlile WR, Raviv M, Nichols M, Clothier B, et al., editors. 29 th International horticultural congress on horticulture: sustaining lives, livelihoods and landscapes (IHC2014). Proceedings of the International symposia on water, eco-efficiency and transformation of organic waste in horticultural production; 2014 August 17–22; Brisbane, Australia. [S. l.]: International Society for Horticultural Science; 2016. p. 193–200 (Acta horticulturae; number 1112). DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1112.27.
  36. Erdal İ, Aktaş H, Yaylacı C, Türkan ŞA, Aydın G, Hor Y. Effects of peat based substrate combinations on mineral nutrition, growth and yield of tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2024;47(1):30–48. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2023.2265969.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

Issue

Section

Biotechnology and Microbiology

How to Cite

Artishevskaya, V. E., Shashko, A. Y., Ovsey, A. A., Nedelko, R. S., Bandarenka, U. Y., Charnysh, M. A., Hryvusevich, P. V., Yakovets, O. G., Laman, N. A., Sokolik, A. I., & Demidchik, V. V. (2025). Growth characteristics of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings in peat-pearlite substrates enriched with organic and mineral controlled-release fertilisers. Experimental Biology and Biotechnology, 2, 44-57. https://doi.org/10.33581/2957-5060-2025-2-%p