Economic and geographical and socio-economic differences of regions of the Republic of Belarus as a basis for improvement of administrative-territorial division

Authors

  • Ekaterina A. Antipova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-5500 (unauthenticated)
  • Aleksej N. Shavel Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Ilja I. Zaprudskij Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

Belarusian school of economic geography, the Republic of Belarus, administrative and territorial division, regional disproportions, demographic and socio-economic differences

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of economic-geographical and socio-economic differences of the regions of the Republic of Belarus in order to improve the administrative and territorial division (ATD). The decisive role of the Belarusian scientific school of economic geography in developing of the principles of the ATD of Belarus at various periods of development is shown. The historical stages of formation, advantages and disadvantages of the current system of the ATD of the Republic of Belarus are revealed. The positive and negative international experience of conducting of administrative and territorial transformations is systematized. The significant disproportions in the resource, demographic and economic potential of the regions of Belarus and their various contributions to the social and economic development of the state are determined. Based on the centro-peripheral principle, a scheme of the regions of Belarus by the level of socio-economic development has been developed, which indicates significant changes in the development of regional economic complexes that have occurred over the past decades. About 20 % administrative districts are characterized by the properties of the center or semi-center, which have the ability to perform the functions of regional centers in the new ATD. More than 30 % administrative areas are peripheral in terms of socio-economic development. The obtained results are the basis to the need to improve the ATD of the Republic of Belarus.

Author Biographies

  • Ekaterina A. Antipova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (geography), full professor; head of the department of economic and social geography, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

  • Aleksej N. Shavel, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    senior lecturer at the department of economic and social geography, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

  • Ilja I. Zaprudskij, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    senior lecturer at the department of economic and social geography, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

References

  1. Borisevich VI, Gejzler PS, Fateev VS. Ekonomika regiona [Economics of region]. Minsk: Belarus State Economic University; 2002. 432 p. Russian.
  2. Smolich AA. Geografija Belarusi. 4-e vydan’ne [Geography of Belarus. 4 th edition]. Mensk: Belarus; 1993. p. 199–200. Belarusian.
  3. Lis AG. Problemy razvitiya i razmeshcheniya proizvoditel’nykh sil Belorussii [Problems of development and location of the productive forces of Belarus]. Moscow: Nauka; 1972. p. 254 –274. Russian.
  4. Aleksandrovich JaM, Zav’yalkov AG. Regional’noe planirovanie: voprosy razvitiya i razmeshcheniya proizvoditel’nykh sil BSSR [Regional planning: issues of development and deployment of the productive forces of the BSSR]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1982. p. 140 –143. Russian.
  5. Pirozhnik II. [Economic-geographical typology of the Belorussian SSR districts]. Vestnik BGU. Seriya 2. Khimiya. Biologiya. Geografiya. 1986;3:63– 67. Russian.
  6. Ridevskij GV. Territorial’naya organizatsiya Respubliki Belarus’: sotsial’no-ekologo-ekonomicheskaya model’ perekhoda k ustoichivomu razvitiyu [Territorial organization of the Republic of Belarus: socio-ecological and economic model of transition to sustainable development]. Mogilev: Mogilev State A. Kuleshov University; 2007. 525 p. Russian.
  7. Kozlovskaja LV. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya Belarusi. Chast’ 1. Usloviya i faktory sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya i territorial’noi organizatsii khozyaistva Belarusi [Socio-economic geography of Belarus. Part 1. Conditions and factors of socio-economic development and territorial organization of the economy of Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2002. 107 p. Russian.
  8. Regiony Respubliki Belarus’, 2017: statisticheskii sbornik. Tom 1 [Regions of the Republic of Belarus, 2017: statistical compilation. Volume 1]. Minsk: National Statistical Committee ot the Republic of Belarus; 2017. Russian.
  9. Antipova EA. [Regional features of the demographic development of the Republic of Belarus]. In: Mironova TN, Rjazanceva SV, editors. Sostoyanie i perspektivy demograficheskogo razvitiya Respubliki Belarus’. Minsk: V. I. Z. A. Group; 2017. p. 100 –122. Russian.
  10. Pripolova LI. [Reform of the territorial structure in European unitary states and its prospects for Ukraine]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel’nykh organakh. 2012;1(48):92–96. Russian.
  11. Zakon ot 24 iyulya 1998 goda o vvedenii trekhurovnevogo territorial’nogo deleniya gosudarstva v Respublike Pol’sha [Internet; cited 2018 July 16]. Available from: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19980960603. Russian.
  12. Istorichesko razvitie na administrativno-teritorialnoto ustroĭstvo na teritoriyata na Bŭlgariya [Historical development of the administrative and territorial structure of the territory of Bulgaria]. Sofia: Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works; 2006. 11 p. Bulgarian.
  13. Predlozheniya Ministerstva okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy i regional’nogo razvitiya (MEPRD) po reformirovaniyu administrativno-territorial’nogo deleniya Latvii [Internet; cited 2018 July 16]. Available from: http://www.varam.gov.lv/lat/aktual/aktuali/?doc=20443. Russian.
  14. Martynov VL. Experience of the reform of the administrative-territorial division of Finland. Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal. 2012;14:201–205. Russian.
  15. Semeko GV. [Territorial reforms in France: from decentralization to recentralization of public administration]. Ars Administrandi. 2017;9(3):476 – 494. Russian. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2017-3-476-494.
  16. Chojnicki Z, Czyż T. Nowa organizacja terytorialna polski і układ regionalny. Czasopismo Geograficzne. 2000;LXXI:261–277.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-06-20

Issue

No. 1 (2019): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology

Section

Geography

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Antipova, E.A. et al. 2019. Economic and geographical and socio-economic differences of regions of the Republic of Belarus as a basis for improvement of administrative-territorial division. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology. 1 (Jun. 2019), 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2019-1-3-21.