Murghab Sovereign’s Estate: features of economic development and the process of colonisation in the late 1880s
Keywords:
Murghab Sovereign’s Estate, Transcaspian Region, Turkmen, Central Asia, Russian Empire, irrigation, colonisation, historical demographyAbstract
The article considers the organisational period in the history of the Murghab Sovereign’s Estate, founded in the Transcaspian Region of the Russian Empire in 1887. It is noted that the true goals of the creation of the estate and the rules of its functioning have not yet been sufficiently investigated. The Murghab Sovereign’s Estate became one of the largest socioeconomic projects of the empire. Its activities were based solely on capitalist approaches to farming, involving the use of the latest achievements of agricultural technology and the development of the processing industry. For the first time, the sources involved allow to shed light on the principles that should have formed the basis for the functioning of a model agricultural complex. The directions and goals of the development of the Murghab Sovereign’s Estate are revealed. It is concluded that from the very beginning of its existence, the estate represented a unique not only economic, but also socio-political phenomenon.
References
- Tikhomirov MN. Prisoedinenie Merva k Rossii [Annexation of Merv to Russia]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo vostochnoi litera¬ tury; 1960. 239 p. Russian.
- Kanoda NN. Agrarnaya politika tsarizma v Turkmenistane [Agrarian policy of tsarism in Turkmenistan]. Ashgabad: Ylym; 1991. 224 p. Russian.
- Savel’ev PI, editor. Imperskii stroi Rossii v regional’nom izmerenii (XIX – nachalo XX veka) [The imperial system of Russia in the regional dimension (19th – early 20th centuries)]. Moscow: Pervyi pechatnyi dvor; 1997. 237 p. Russian.
- Gasparov B, editor. Kazan’, Moskva, Peterburg: Rossiiskaya imperiya vzglyadom iz raznykh uglov [Kazan, Moscow, Peters¬ burg: the Russian Empire as seen from different corners]. Moscow: Ob’edinennoe gumanitarnoe izdatel’stvo; 1997. 414 p. Russian.
- Brower DR, Lazzerini EJ, editors. Russia’s orient: imperial borderlands and peoples, 1700–1917. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1997. 339 p.
- Burbank J, Ransel D, editors. Imperial Russia: new histories for the empire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1998. 359 p.
- Abashin SN, Arapov DYu, Bekmakhanova NE, editors. Tsentral’naya Aziya v sostave Rossiiskoi imperii [Central Asia wi¬ thin the Russian Empire]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2008. 451 p. Russian.
- Kappeler A. Rossiya – mnogonatsional’naya imperiya. Vozniknovenie. Istoriya. Raspad [Russia as a multinational empire. Rise. History. Collapse]. Chervonaya S, translator. Moscow: Progress-traditsiya; 1997. 342 p. Russian.
- Miller AI. Imperiya Romanovyh i nacionalizm [The Romanov empire and nationalism]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2006. 240 p. Russian.
- Vasil’ev DV. Rozhdenie imperii. Yugo-vostok Rossii: XVIII – pervaya polovina XIX v. [Birth of the Empire. South-East Russia: 18th – first half of the 19th century]. Saint Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin; 2020. 608 p. Russian.
- Vasil’ev DV, Asanova SA. [Shelter for the afflicted: migration from Xinjiang to Russia in the 1860–1880s]. RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2023;1:34–46. Russian. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2023-22-1-34-46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














