The Muslim community and crisis of British multiculturalism at the beginning of the XXI century
Keywords:
British Muslims, multiculturalism, host society, Great Britain, radicalizationAbstract
The article is devoted to the development problems of multiculturalism in Great Britain. The purpose of study is defining a role of Moslems in crisis of British multiculturalism at the beginning of the 21st century. In the course of research both general scientific methods and special historical (historical-systems, historical-genetic) methods were applied. In article it is shown, that disorders in the summer of 2001 in the north of England, acts of terrorism on September, 11th in New York and on July, 7th, 2005 in London became an occasion to discussion about revision of ethnoconfessional policy. It is proved that military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, pendency of immigration and social and economic problems in the country have provoked discontent from Muslims and growth of islamophobia in the host society. Thus, crisis in relations of a Muslim community and the host society began to be perceived as a crisis of multiculturalism. It is shown, that British government declared off multiculturalism in February, 2011 on a wave of strengthening of attention of the host society to a problem of Islamic radicalism. It is ascertained that deradicalization has been put in the chapter of interior policy with regard to Muslims. In the conclusion it is proved that the government of the Great Britain has supported individual social and economic and cultural integration through activity at local level. It has excluded the state support of the Muslim organizations which quite often had communications with extremists. But the purposeful policy concerning the British Muslims is absent.
References
- Gromyko A. A., Anan’eva E. V. (eds). [Dilemmas of Britain: search of ways of development]. Moscow : Ves’ mir, 2014 (in Russ.).
- Home Office bulding a safe, just and tolerant society. Community cohesion: Report of the Independent Review Team Chaired by Ted Cantle. London, 2001.
- Pleshchunov F. О. [Policy of multiculturalism in Great Britain and radicalization of Islamic youth of the country]. Vostok. 2009. No. 1. P. 100–108 (in Russ.).
- Home Office bulding a safe, just and tolerant society. Secure Borders, Safe Heaven: Integration with Diversity in Modern Britain. Lоndon, 2002.
- Phillips M. Londonistan. New York : Encounter Books, 2006.
- Birt J. Good Imam, Bad Imam: Civic Religion and National Integration in Britain post–9/11. Muslim World. 2006. Vol. 96, issue 4. P. 687–706.
- Hussain D. British Muslims in the Anti–Terror Age. Glob. Dialogue. 2007. Vol. 9, issue 3/4. P. 75–87.
- Cameron D. Extremism, Individual Rights and the Rule of Law in Britain [Electronic resource]. URL: http://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599697 (date of access: 21.07.2016).
- PM’s speech at Munich Security Conference [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches–and–transcripts/2011/02/pms–speech–at–munich–security–conference–60293 (date of access: 11.02.2011).
- Modood T. Multicultural Politics: Racism, Ethnicity, and Muslims in Britain. Minneapolis : Edinburg University Press, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














