County marshal of nobility in the system of local government and self-government in Belarus (1861–1914)
Keywords:
Belarus, the Belarusian province, the marshal of nobility, county administration, noble corporation, local authorities, self-governmentAbstract
The article discusses the role and place of the marshal of nobility in the system of county administration and self-government in the post-reform period. The object of the study is the institute of county marshals of nobility in the Belarusian provinces in the second half of the 19th – early 20th century. The study deterncines the changes in the government policy of the Russian autocracy related to the noble elections in Belarus after the 1863–1864 uprising. The main functions of County leaders in the sphere of class self-government are revealed. The main directions of activity of local heads of nobility in management of administrative district institutions are shown. The characteristics of the functioning of the institute of county marshals of nobility on the territory of Belarus are given. As a result of analysis of the laws the conclusion is made that the marshal of the nobility took the place of a full head of county, and during the period under review, the trend of expanding the powers of the marshals of nobility, testified to their transformation from in-class bodies in administrative, public bodies.
References
- Katkov MA. Rol’ uezdnykh predvoditelei dvoryanstva v gosudarstvennom upravlenii Rossii [The Role of County leaders of the nobility in the state administration of Russia]. Moscow: Pechatnya A. I. Snegirevoi; 1914. 70 p. Russian.
- Korelin AP. Dvoryanstvo v poreformennoi Rossii 1861–1904 gg. [The Nobility in post-reform Russia 1861–1904]. Moscow: Nauka; 1979. 304 p. Russian.
- Sambuk SM. Politika tsarizma v Belorussii vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. [Policy of tsarism in Belarus in the second half of the XIX century]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika; 1980. 223 p. Russian.
- Zhytko AP. Dvaranstva Belarusі peryjadu kapіtalіzmu, 1861–1914 gg. [The nobility of Belarus during capitalism, 1861–1914]. Mіnsk: Belarusian State Pedagogical University; 2003. 233 p. Belarusian.
- Zhytko AP, Talmachova SA. [The autocracy policy towards the institute of the pavet marshals of nobility in Belarus (1861–1914)]. Belaruski gistarychny chasopis. 2013;4:4–13. Belarusian.
- Kaкhanouskі AG. Sacyjal’naja transfarmacyja belaruskaga gramadstva (1861–1914 g.) [Social transformation of Belarusian society (1861–1914)]. Mіnsk: Belarusian State Ubiversity; 2013. 333 p. Belarusian.
- Snapkovskii IN, Iatskevich DL, compilers. Mogilevskaya guberniya: gosudarstvennye, religioznye i obshchestvennye uchrezhdeniya (1772–1917) [Mogilev province: state, religious and public institutions (1772–1917)]. Minsk: Belarus; 2014. 814 p. Russian.
- Kantorovich YaA. Zakony o sostoianiiakh [Laws on estates]. Saint Peterburg: Yuridicheskii knizhnyi sklad «Pravo»; 1911. 1032 p. Russian.
- Shmelev GN, editor. Akty tsarstvovaniya Ekateriny ІІ: uchrezhdeniya dlya upravleniia gubernii i zhalovannye gramoty dvoryanstvu i gorodam [Acts of the reign of Catherine II: institutions for the administration of provinces and charters of nobility and cities]. Moscow: Izdanie Moskovskikh zhenskikh kursov; 1907. 159 p. Russian.
- Trubeckoi PP. Pamyatnaya kniga dlya uezdnogo predvoditelya dvoryanstva [A memorial book for the county leader of the nobility]. Odessa: Odesskii vestnik; 1887. 716 p. Russian.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














