Symbol of revolution: «The image of Kerensky» in the studies of B. I. Kolonitskii
Keywords:
революция, война, культ вождя, символ, репрезентация, А. Ф. Керенский, Б. И. КолоницкийAbstract
The article analizes scrutiny of the mutual influences of facts and symbols in the studies of B. I. Kolonitskii evaluation of symbolism as a form of representation of power, examines of the process of transformation of social, political, ideological, cultural myths and simulacrums into a means of manipulating the public consciousness, and, consequently, in the factor of constructing reality. When interacting with the society, the government uses political symbols, strives to attract the society to its side through political symbols, declare the community of purpose and tasks, identify itself, including through power personalities, the spokesman of common aspirations and hopes. Representatives of power structures become semiotic signs, with varying degrees of reliability reflecting the commonality of elite and mass aspirations. State politicians are transformed, if they succeed, into symbols of the revolution. The revolutionary government always has the desire to achieve this, but it is not always possible to achieve the task set. However, in the case of the successful implementation of the «symbolic project», or in case of its failure, the historian, when studying personal symbols, gets an opportunity to analyze more deeply the many components of the revolutionary process. The author to the conclusion that symbols are especially important in the critical moments of history, during social upheavals and cataclysms. The Russian Revolution of 1917 unconditionally refers to such historical events.
References
- Kolonitskii ВI. Kerensky. In: Akton E, Rozenberg UG, Chernyaev VY. Critical dictionary of the Russian Revolution: 1914– 1921. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoria; 2014. p. 128–138. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. Simvoly vlasti i bor’ba za vlast’: k izucheniyu politicheskoi kul’tury rossii-skoi revolyutsii 1917 goda [Symbols of power and the struggle for power: to study the political culture of the Russian revolution of 1917]. Saint Petersburg: Liki Rossii; 2012. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. «Tovarishch Kerenskii»: antimonarkhicheskaya revolyutsiya i formirovanie kul’ta «vozhdya naroda» (mart – iyun’ 1917 goda) [«Comrade Kerensky»: an anti-monarchist revolution and the formation of the cult of the «leader of the people» (March–June 1917)]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2017. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. Legitimatsiya cherez zhizneopisaniya: Biografiya A. F. Kerenskogo (1917 god) [Legitimation through biographies: Biography of A. F. Kerensky (1917)]. In: Obatnin GV, Pesonen P, editors. History and Narrative. Helsinki, Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2006. p. 246–278. Russian.
- Mieville Ch. October: the story of the Russian Revolution. London: Verso; 2017. Russian edition: M’evil’ Ch. Oktyabr’. Movchan AB, Fedyushin V, Beliakov T, translates; Gorinova N, editor. Moscow: Publishing house «E»; 2017.
- Fedyuk VP. Kerensky. Moscow: Molodaya gvardia; 2009. Russian.
- Danilkin L. Lenin. Pantokrator solnechnykh pylinok [Lenin. Pantocrator of solar dust]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardia; 2017. Russian.
- Zygar’ M. Imperiya dolzhna umeret’. Istoriya russkikh revolyutsii v litsakh. 1900–1917 [Empire must die. The history of Russian revolutions in the faces. 1900–1917]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardia; 2017. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. Pechat’ i revolyutsiya [The Print and the Revolution]. In: Acton E, Rosenberg HS, Chernyaev VY. Critical dictionary of the Russian Revolution: 1914–1921. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya; 2014. p. 376–383. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. «Tragicheskaya erotika»: obrazy imperatorskoi sem’i v gody Pervoi Mirovoi voiny [«Tragic eroticism»: images of the imperial family during the First World War]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2010. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. Obraz sestry miloserdiya v rossiiskoi kul’ture epokhi Pervoi mirovoi voiny [The image of the sister of mercy in the Russian culture of the First World War]. In: Bruish K, Katzer N, editors. Bol’shaya voina Rossii: Sotsial’nyi poryadok, publichnaya kommunikatsiya i nasilie na rubezhe tsarskoi i sovetskoi epokh [The Great War of Russia: Social Order, Public Communication and Violence at the Turn of the Tsarist and Soviet Epoch]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2014. p. 100–126. Russian.
- Kolonitskii ВI. Feminizatsiya obraza A. F. Kerenskogo i politicheskaya izolyatsiya Vremennogo pravitel’stva osen’yu 1917 goda [Feminization of the image of AF Kerensky and the political isolation of the Provisional Government in the fall of 1917]. In: «Russkaya revolyutsiya 1917 goda: problemy istorii i istoriografii»: sbornik do-kladov mezhvuzovskoi nauchnoi konferentsii; 16 noyabrya 2012; Sankt-Peterburg, Rossiya. Saint Petersburg: LETI; 2012. p. 91–103. Russian.
- Kruglyi stol. Desyat’ ottenkov krasnogo [Round table. Ten shades of red]. Neva. 2017;11:164–185. Russian.
- Figes О, Kolonitskii В. Interpreting the Russian Revolution: The Language and Symbols of 1917. New Haven; London: Yale University Press; 1999.
- Kolonitskii ВI. #1917: Seventeen essays on the history of the Russian Revolution. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge; 2017. Russian.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














