«Too much ideological bitterness has been added to this issue»: V. N. Andreev’s correspondence with M. Finley

Authors

  • Sergey G. Karpyuk Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 55а Mira Avenue, Omsk 644077, Russia; Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences, 32a Leninskii Avenue, Moscow 119334, Russia

Keywords:

V. N. Andreev, M. Finley, thaw, USSR, Ancient history, Soviet historiography
Supporting Agencies
The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-2800519 «Diversity under the mask of unity: Soviet historical narrative of the 1960–80s (an example of the history of Antiquity)»).

Abstract

The documents of M. Finley in the library of Cambridge University and in the personal fund of V. N. Andreev in the manuscript department of the Russian National Library in Saint Petersburg contain letters from two historians. The correspondence of M. Finley and V. N. Andreev shows that the Soviet scientist was not only a situational Finlean, but also quite consciously followed the principles of M. Finley’s work with sources. Acquaintance with M. Finley’s works and correspondence with him significantly influenced V. N. Andreev: he became a follower of an English scientist, working outside the framework of scientific schools that existed in Soviet scholarship. Correspondence with M. Finley shows a high degree of inclusion of a Soviet scientist in the current agenda of world science about Antiquity in the late 1950s – first half of the 1960s, however, the closeness of the Soviet scientific community, the lack of full-fledged international communication did not contribute to the perception of V. N. Andreev’s ideas by Western scientists. For M. Finley, V. N. Andreev was apparently just one of his many followers scattered around the world. The lack of personal contact did not allow this position to be changed. The very fact that the Soviet scientist in matters of methodology followed and listened to the advice of the scientist of the «bourgeois» testified that the Soviet historiography of Antiquity since the late 1950s could no longer be perceived as a single stream; the Soviet historical narrative of the thaw era ceases to be unified.

Author Biography

  • Sergey G. Karpyuk, Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 55а Mira Avenue, Omsk 644077, Russia; Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences, 32a Leninskii Avenue, Moscow 119334, Russia

    doctor of science (history); chief researcher

References

  1. Karpyuk SG. [Emily Grace (Emiliya L’vovna Kazakevich), American philologist-classicist and Soviet historian]. Vestnik drevnei istorii. 2016;76(1):141–161. Russian.
  2. Fine JVA. Horoi: studies in mortgage, real security and land tenure in Ancient Athens. Baltimore: American School of Classical Studies at Athens; 1951. 232 p.
  3. Finley MI. Studies in land and credit in Ancient Athens, 500–200 B. C. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1952. 332 p.
  4. Gluskina LM. [The new studies on the history of the agrarian relations and credit in Ancient Attica]. Vestnik drevnei istorii. 1957;4:154–167. Russian.
  5. Finley MI. Was Greek civilization based on slave labour? Historia. 1959;8(2):145–164.
  6. Gavrilyuk NA. Ekonomika stepnoi Skifii VI–III vv. do n. e. [The economy of steppes Scythia in the 6th–3rd centuries B. C.]. Kyiv: Oleg Filjuk; 2013. 704 p. Russian.
  7. Rotermel’ LR. [V. N. Andreev’s theory of the socioeconomic conditions of the classical Greece]. In: Elagina AA, editor. Antichnyi vestnik: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Antique messenger: collection of scientific papers]. Omsk: Dostoevsky Omsk State University; 2005. p. 87–97. Russian.
  8. Gluskina LM. [Problems of the crisis of polis]. In: Golubtsova ES, editor. Antichnaya Gretsiya. Problemy razvitiya polisa. Tom 2 [Ancient Greece. Problems of the polis development. Volume 2]. Moscow: Nauka; 1983. p. 5–42. Russian.
  9. Andreev VN. [Agrarian history of Attica in the 5th – 4th centuries B. C]. In: Golubtsova ES, editor. Antichnaya Gretsiya. Problemy razvitiya polisa. Tom 1 [Ancient Greece. Problems of the polis development. Volume 1]. Moscow: Nauka; 1983. p. 247–326. Russian.
  10. Andreyev VN. Some aspects of agrarian conditions in attica in the fifth to third centuries BC. Eirene. 1974;12:5–46.
  11. Khrshanovskii VA. [Late confession. Vladislav Nikolaevich Andreev (1927–1984) in memoriam]. In: Zuev VJu, editor-compiler. The Bosporan phenomenon: general and peculiar features of historical and cultural space in the world of classical Antiquity: proceedings of the international conference. Part 1; 2018 November 28–30; Saint Petersburg, Russia. Saint Petersburg: Publishing and Printing Center of Saint-Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design; 2018. p. 29–39. Russian.
  12. Krikh SB. Drugaya istoriya: «periferiinaya» sovetskaya nauka o drevnosti [Another history: «peripheric» Soviet science on the Ancient world]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2020. 314 p. Russian.
  13. Finley MI. The Ancient economy. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1973. 222 p.
  14. Shipton K. Leasing and lending: the cash economy in fourth-century BC Athens. Oxford: University Press; 2000. 147 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

[1]
Karpyuk, S.G. 2022. «Too much ideological bitterness has been added to this issue»: V. N. Andreev’s correspondence with M. Finley. Journal of the Belarusian State University. History. 4 (Oct. 2022), 72–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2520-6338-2022-4-72-79.