The First World War and emerging of a new regional order in the Balkans: an augmentation of small states' role
Keywords:
First World War, Balkans, regional order, small states, Austria-Hungary, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, GreeceAbstract
The First World War launched a tremendous restructuring of the international system. One of its major outcomes was a transformation of the small states of Central and South-Eastern Europe from objects to subjects of international relations. Having emerged or enlarged their territories in wake of multinational empires’ collapse, the small states became key players on the regional level. Reshaping of the Balkan regional order is of a particular interest to researchers as the Balkan instability triggered destruction of the previous international system. The purpose of the article is to understand how a world conflict, which had broken out in South-Eastern Europe, transformed the region. To do this the author dwells upon three sets of question. The first is the Balkan contribution in the origins of the First World War. The second is an interplay of factors which caused reshaping of the Balkan political space during the war years. The third is a new landscape of the postwar order in South-Eastern Europe. Methodological approaches applied here define new and actual character of this article. The author uses conceptual tools of the theory of international relations to analyze a process of region «building» which took place in circumstances of «tectonic» shifts within the international system in the early decades of the 20th century. Thus, the author applies the analytical model of the regional order as well as key definitions of the theory of international relations – great power, small state (the article focuses on Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece), principle of self-determination. It is concluded that the regional order emerged in the Balkans in wake of the First World War was a result of multi-dimensional interaction of factors. They are as follows: 1) the military, strategic and foreign policy planning of hostile coalitions of powers (the Entente and the bloc of the Central powers), seeking to win the loyalty of regional allies; 2) demonstrated by the small states understanding that the war had opened a «window of opportunity» to put into life their national interests and programs; 3) the decline of traditional multi-ethnic empires, which had formed political atmosphere in the Balkans. It is stated that a landscape of post-war regional order in the Balkans was determined with cooperation and competition of the local national states in the situation when the multi-ethnic empires had disappeared from the Balkan political space while the architects of the Versailles system – Great Britain and France seemed to be less interested in South-Eastern Europe in after war years. It meant that the new Balkan order enjoyed a relative autonomy compared to the previous one.
References
- Toynbee A. The world after the peace conference: being an epilogue to the «History of the Peace Conference of Paris» and a prologue to the «Survey of International Affairs, 1920–1923». London: Oxford University Press; 1925. 91 p.
- Seton-Watson RW. German, Slav, and Magyar: a study in the origins of the Great War. London: Williams and Norgate; 1916. 198 p.
- Goldsworthy V. Inventing Ruritania: the imperialism of the imagination. London: Hurst and Company; 2013. 302 p.
- Todorova M. Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. 288 p.
- Vinogradov VN. [Again on new approaches to the history of the First World War]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. 1995;5:62–74. Russian.
- Emets VA. [The Soviet historiography of the First World War]. In: Sidorov AL, editor. Pervaya mirovaya voina 1914–1918 [First World War 1914–1918]. Moscow: Nauka; 1968. p. 23–57. Russian.
- Zolotorev VA, Listikov SYu, editors. Voina i obshchestvo v XX veke. Kniga 1. Voina i obshchestvo nakanune i v period Pervoi mirovoi voiny [War and society in 20th century. Book 1. War and society on the eve and during of the First World War]. Moscow: Nauka; 2008. 611 p. Russian.
- Kozenko BD. [Domestic historiography of the First World War]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. 2001;3:3–27. Russian.
- Mal’kov VL, editor. Pervaya mirovaya voina. Prolog XX veka [The First World War. The prologue of the 20th century]. Moscow: Nauka; 1998. 693 p. Russian.
- Pisarev YuA, Mal’kov VL, editors. Pervaya mirovaya voina: diskussionnye problemy istorii [The First World War: historiography discussions]. Moscow: Nauka; 1994. 304 p. Russian.
- Mal’kov VL, Shkundin GD, editors. Mirovye voiny XX veka. Kniga 2. Pervaya mirovaya voina: dokumenty i materialy [World wars of the 20th century. Book 2. The First World War: documents and materials]. Moscow: Nauka; 2002. 580 p. Russian.
- Belousov LS, Manykin AS, editors. Pervaya mirovaya voina i sud’by evropeiskoi tsivilizatsii [The First World War and the destiny of European civilization]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta; 2014. 816 p. Russian.
- Mirovye voiny XX veka. Kniga 1. Pervaya mirovaya voina: istoricheskii ocherk [World wars of the 20th century. Book 1. The First World War: a historical essay]. Moscow: Nauka; 2002. 686 p. Russian.
- Barnes HE. The genesis of the world war: an introduction to the problem of war guilt. New York: A. A. Knopf; 1927. 796 p.
- Fay SB. The origins of the world war. Volume II. After Sarajevo. Immediate causes of the war. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1928. 622 p.
- McMeekin S. The Russian origins of the First World War. Cambridge (Mass.): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011. 324 p.
- Otte TG. A «formidable factor» in European politics: views of Russia in 1914. In: Levy JS, Vasquez JA, editors. The outbreak of the First World War: structure, politics and decision-making. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. р. 87–112.
- Williamson SR. July 1914 revisited and revised: the erosion of the German paradigm. In: Levy JS, Vasquez JA, editors. The outbreak of the First World War: structure, politics and decision-making. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. р. 30–62.
- Clark C. The sleepwalkers: how Europe went to war in 1914. London: Penguin Books; 2013. 697 p.
- Aganson OI. [Anglo-American historiography on the Balkan origins of World War I: contemporary tendencies and approaches]. In: Danchenko SI, editor. Slavyane i Rossiya: istoricheskii kontekst i problemy istoriografii [Slavs and Russia: historical context and problems of historiography]. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; 2015. p. 247–268. Russian.
- Aganson OI. [The Balkans of 1914: «the Thucydides model» in action?]. In: Danchenko SI, editor. Slavyane i Rossiya: problemy voiny i mira na Balkanakh. XVIII–XXI vv. K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika Yu. A. Pisareva [Slavs and Russia: problems of war and peace in the Balkans. 18th–21th centuries. To the 100th anniversary of the birth of academician Yu. A. Pisarev]. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. p. 215–232. Russian.
- Schroeder PW. Stealing horses to great applause: Austria-Hungary’s decision in 1914 in systemic perspective. In: Afflerbach H, Stevenson D, editors. An improbable war? The outbreak of World War I and European political culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn Books; 2007. р. 17–42.
- Remak J. 1914 – The Third Balkan War: origins reconsidered. The Journal of Modern History. 1971;43(3):354–366.
- Radojević M, Dimić Lj. Srbija u Velikom ratu 1914–1918 [Serbia in the Great War 1914–1918]. Belgrade: Srpska književna zadruga; 2014. 298 p. Serbian.
- Shkundin GD. Razdelyai i vlastvui! Vopros o separatnom mire s Bolgariei v politike derzhav Antanty (oktyabr’ 1915 – mart 1916 g.) [Divide et impera! The Entente powers’ policy towards a separate peace with Bulgaria (October 1915 – March 1916)]. Sofia: Prof. Marin Drinov; 2007. 182 p. Russian.
- Vinogradov VN, editor. Za balkanskimi frontami Pervoi mirovoi voiny [Behind the Balkan fronts of the First World War]. Moscow: Indrik; 2002. 504 p. Russian.
- Petrunina OE. Grecheskaya natsiya i gosudarstvo v XVIII–XX vv.: ocherki politicheskogo razvitiya [Greek nation and state in the 18th–20th centuries: studies in political history]. Moscow: KDU; 2010. 744 p. Russian.
- Lloyd George D. Voennye memuary. Toma 1–2 [War memoirs. Volumes 1–2]. Zvavich I, translator. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo; 1934. 678 p. Russian.
- Meyer HC. Mitteleuropa in German thought and action, 1815–1945. The Hague: Martinus Hijhoff; 1955. 390 p.
- Joffre J. Mémoires du maréchal Joffre (1910–1917). Tome 2. Paris: Plon; 1932. 468 p.
- Sosnosky T. Die Balkanpolitik Österreich-Ungarns seit 1866. Band 1. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt; 1913. 307 S.
- D’Hoop MJM. La France, la Grande-Bretagne et les Pays balkaniques de 1936 à 1939. In: Les relations franco-britanniques de 1935 à 1939: communications présentées aux colloques franco-britanniques tenus à Londres (Imperial War Museum) du 18 au 21 octobre 1971, Paris (Comité d’histoire de la 2ème guerre mondiale) du 25 au 29 septembre 1972. Paris: CNRS Éditions; 1975. p. 53–63.
- Yaz’kova AA. Malaya Antanta v evropejskoi politike. 1918–1925 [The Little Entente in the European politics. 1918–1925]. Moscow: Nauka; 1974. 330 p. Russian.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)














