Establishing the legal nature of unilateral acts of states
Abstract
There is a well established proposition that an intent of a State to be bound is a primary criterion for establishing the legal character of a unilateral act. However, this proposition does not solve the problem of interpretation of a State’s intent to be legally bound and of determining whether a certain act is subject to unilateral acts of States regime. A range of unilaterally formulated statements and declarations are examined in the article with a view to reveal different aspects of the process of determination of legal nature of a particular act of a State. Based on results of consideration of negative security assurances, notifications on the adoption of legislative acts, promises of granting a visa-free regime, assurances to support the acceptance of a State in an international organization, suggestions are formulated concerning the evaluation of certain unilateral statements for qualifying them as legal acts.
References
- Abashidze Akh. Odnostoronnie akty gosudarstv: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Unilateral acts of States: questions of theory and practice]. Voronezh: Nauka-Unipress; 2013. Russian.
- Kalamkaryan R. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe znachenie odnostoronnikh yuridicheskikh aktov gosudarstv [International legal relevance of unilateral legal acts of States]. Moscow: Nauka; 1984. Russian.
- Melnik S. Odnostoronnie akty gosudarstv v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Unilateral acts of States in contemporary international law]. Odessa: Fenix; 2011. Russian.
- Skubiszewski K. Les actes unilatéraux des états. In: Bedjaoui M, editor. Droit international: bilan et perspectives. Vol. 1. Paris: Pedone; 1991.
- Zemanek K. Unilateral legal acts revisited. In: Wellens K, editor. International law: theory and practice : essays in honour of E. Suy. The Hague: Kluwer Law Internationa; 1998.
- Saganek P. Unilateral Acts of States in Public International Law. Leiden, Boston: Brill-Nijhoff; 2016.
- Goodman C. Acta Sunt Servanda? A regime for the unilateral acts of states at international law. ANZIL Сonference 2005 June 16–18; Canberra, Australia; The Australian National University, College of Law [cited 2013 December 26]. Available from: http://150.203.86.5/cipl/Conferences_SawerLecture/05-ANZSIL-Papers/Goodman.pdf.
- Eckart Ch. Promises of states under international law. Portland: Hart Publishing; 2012.
- Kasotti E. The Juridical Nature of Unilateral Acts of States in International Law. Leiden, Boston: Brill, Nijhoff; 2015.
- Letter dated 6 April 1995 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://undocs.org/A/50/153.
- Letter dated 6 April 1995 from the Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://undocs.org/A/50/155.
- Letter dated 6 April 1995 from the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://undocs.org/A/50/151.
- Letter dated 6 April 1995 from the Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://undocs. org/A/50/152.
- Letter dated 6 April 1995 from the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://undocs.org/A/50/154.
- Garcia Rico del Mar E. El uso de las armas nucleares y el derecho internacional. Madrid: Tecnos; 1999. 16. Eighth report on Unilateral Acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_557.pdf&lang=EFSX.
- Conclusion of effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon States against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons: resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 2 December 2008 [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: https://undocs.org/A/RES/63/39.
- Security Council, fiftieth year: 3514th meeting, 11th April 1995: provisional report, PV.3514. United Nations Organization [cited 2017 Decemder 15]. Available from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/PRO/N95/852/66/PDF/ N9585266.pdf?OpenElement.
- International Law Commission Report: 56th session, 3rd May – 4th June, 5th July – 6th August 2004 [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/reports/a_59_10.pdf.
- Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons : advisory opinion, July 8th, 1996, A/51/218. International Court of Justice [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN. pdf.
- Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons : dissenting opinion of Vice-President Schwebel. International Court of Justice [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-09EN.pdf.
- Security assurances : working paper, submitted to the 2005 Review Conference of the parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons by New Zealand on behalf of Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, Sweden and South Africa as members of the New Agenda Coalition, May 27th 2005, NPT/CONF.2005/WP.61 [cited 2017 December 15]. Available from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/372/86/IMG/N0537286.pdf?OpenElement.
- Andreeva Y. Interpreting сonsent to arbitration as a unilateral act of state: a case against conventions. Arbitration International. 2011;27(2):129–146. DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/27.2.129.
- Potesta M. The interpretation of consent to ICSID arbitration contained in domestic investment law. Arbitration International. 2011;27(2):149–170. DOI: 10.1093/arbitration/27.2.149.
- Seventh report on Unilateral Acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_542.pdf.
- List of countries with which Belarus has agreements on regime of travel [cited 2011 January 10]. Available from: http:// www.mfa.gov.by/visa/addfc03bf5492769.html Russian.
- Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo (new application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Rwanda): jurisdiction of the court and admissibility of the application: judgment of 3 February 2006. International Court of Justice [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/126/10435.pdf.
- Statement of the Embassy of Russia for the press on regime of attendance of Champions League final by British fans [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: http://www.rus.rusemb.org.uk/article/15 Russian.
- Fans to visit Russia visa-free for 2018 World Cup: press release [cited 2017 December 10]. Available from: https:// rusemb.org.uk/press/482.
- Fiedler W. Zur Verbindlichkeit einseitiger Versprechen im Völkerrecht. GYIL. 1976;19:35–72. German. 31. Savchuk K. Stanovlennja ta rozvytok mizhnarodno-pravovogo spivrabitnyctva v ramkah GUAM [Formation and development of international legal co-operation within the framework of GUAM]. Pravova derzhava. 2006;17:303–317 Ukrainian.
- Statement by the Representative of the Russian Federation, M. V. Zabolotskaya, in the Sixth Committee on agenda item 144 “Report of the International Law Commission” to the 59th session of the UN General Assembly on 2004 November 9 [cited 2013 June 12]. Available from: http://www.un.int/russia/statemnt/ga/59th/6th_com/041109r6.pdf Russian.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)