Attemps at reshaping the Eurasian space

Aleksandr M. Baichorov

Авторы

Александр Мухтарович Байчоров Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

Ключевые слова:

евразийское пространство, интеграция, стратегия «Новый шелковый путь», инициатива «Пояс и путь», концепция «Большое евразийское партнерство», политиковоенный альянс, сопряжение, конвергенция, конфликт, власть, национальный интерес, транспортировка, Евразийский экономический союз

Аннотация

Рассмотрены концепции, политические и экономические инициативы Вашингтона, Пекина, Москвы и Токио по реформатированию евразийского пространства. Более подробно рассмотрены американская стратегия «Новый шелковый путь», китайская инициатива «Пояс и путь» и российская концепция «Большое евразийское партнерство». Показано, при каких обстоятельствах эти инициативы выдвигались и какую эволюцию претерпели в первые два десятилетия XXI в.

Биография автора

Александр Мухтарович Байчоров, Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

доктор философских наук, профессор; профессор кафедры международных отношений факультета международных отношений

Библиографические ссылки

Baichorov AM. Eurasian integration at the crossroads. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2017;2:13–18.
Baichorov AM. [Eurasian integration and European security]. In: Baichorov AM, editor. Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Vypusk 6 [Actual problems of international relations and global development: collection of scientific articles. Issue 6]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2018. p. 7–20. Russian.
Danilovich MV. [Economic belt of the Silk Road: characteristics of its implementation in the EAEU space]. In: Baichorov AM, editor. Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Vypusk 4 [Actual problems of international relations and global development: collection of scientific articles. Issue 4]. Minsk: Belarusian State Univerity; 2016. p. 235–239. Russian.
Rubo OP. [Role of “One Belt – One Road” initiative in the relations of the European Union with China]. In: Baichorov AM, editor. Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Vypusk 4 [Actual problems of international relations and global development: collection of scientific articles. Issue 4]. Minsk: Belarusian State Univerity; 2016. p. 247–248. Russian.
Mezhevich NM. Integration of integrations: should one look for a black cat in the dark room? Saint Petersburg: [s. n.]; 2015. 48 p. Russian.
Pon’ka TI, Bel’chenko AS, Trusova AA. [Double vector approach of the PRC to the resolution of the disputes in the South China Sea]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2017;17(3):518–529. Russian.
Yurtaev VI, Rogov AS. [SCO and BRICS: characteristics of the participation in the process of Eurasian integration]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2017;17(3):469–482. Russian.
Arutunyan B. [EAEU: integrational union or geopolitical center]. Novaya Evraziya. 2015;1:12–15. Russian.
Laumulin MT. The Eurasian security system and Belarus: problems of geopolitical interdependence. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations. 2017;2:31–40.
Kuziev NA. Concept of the New Silk Road: essence, specifity, prospects. Molodoi uchenyi. 2015;2(82):406–408. Russian.
American expert described the essence of “New Silk Road” strategy [Internet; cited 2018 Febryary 26]. Available from: http://regnum.ru/news/1469591.html. Russian.
Marat E. Afganistan in the center of the US “The New Silk Road” strategy. 2011 September 29. [Internet; cited 2018 February 27]. Available from: http://where.goglos_ameriki.ru/a/afganistansilkparth20110929130815828/246008.html. Russian.
Clinton H. America’s Pacific century [Internet; cited 2018 February 27]. Foreign Policy. Available from: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century?page=0,6.
Xi Jinping. O gosudarstvennom upravlenii [On state management]. Beijing: Izdatel’stvo literatury na inostrannykh yazykakh; 2014. 540 p. Russian.
Vision and actions on jointly building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21stcentury Maritime Silk Road. 2015 March 28. Issued by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, with State Council authorization, March 2015. 24 p.
Putin VV. New integration project for Eurasia – the future that is born today [Internet; cited 2016 March 2]. Available from: https://iz.ru/news/502761. Russian.
For good days and for bad… Words of union. Lisbon/Vladivostok. The Magazine for a Common Economic Space. 2019;2:12–19.
Joint statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on cooperation in conjugation of the building of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Economic belt of the Silk Road. 2015 May 8. [Internet; cited 2019 November 1]. Available from: kremlin.ru/supplement/4971. Russian.
Karaganov S. [Promise of Eurasia. Pivot of China to the West is extremely beneficial for Russia]. 2015 October 26. [Internet; cited 2019 September 29]. Available from: http://karaganov.ru/publications/378. Russian.
President’s address to the Russian Federation Parliament. 2015 December 3. [Internet; cited 2019 September 29]. Available from: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50864. Russian.
Crabtree J. China needs to make the Belt and Road initiative more transparent and predictable. 2019 April 29 [Internet; cited 2019 June 16]. Available from: https: www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/chinaneedsmakebeltandroadinitiativemoretransparentandpredictable.