Impact of new media on public opinion: a comparative study
Keywords:
new media, public opinion, digital age, media literacy, echo chambers, polarisation, algorithmic personalisation, information democratisationAbstract
The article presents the results of a comprehensive comparative study on the impact of new media on public opinion formation in the digital age. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the dual nature of this influence: on one hand, the study examines the democratising functions of new media, expressed through expanded access to information, increased diversity of voices in public discourse, and enhanced civic engagement; on the other hand, it identifies negative consequences such as the formation of algorithmic echo chambers, increased social polarisation, and the spread of disinformation. The practical significance of the study lies in developing of a system of measures aimed at enhancing critical media literacy, optimising algorithmic content personalisation, and establishing balanced regulatory approaches for the digital information environment.
References
- Möller J, Helberger L, Trilling N, Eskens N, van Es B. Mapping exposure diversity: the divergent effects of algorithmic news curation. Journal of Communication. 2022;72(3):322–344 DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqac009.
- Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359:1146–1151. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
- Pariser E. The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press; 2011. 294 p.
- Castells M. Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Chirchister: Wiley; 2012. 298 p.
- Dubois E, Blank G. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society. 2018;21(5):729–745. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
- Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication. 2006;43(4):51–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
- Howard PN, Woolley S, Calo R. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: the challenge of automated political communication. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2018;15(2):81–93. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735.
- Scheufele DA, Tewksbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication. 2007;57(1):9–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Journalism
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)
