Специальный субъект создания преступного сообщества (преступной организации): вопросы унификации законодательства Беларуси и России

Александр Яковлевич Гришко

Authors

Alexander Y. Grishko Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 3 Ankudinovskoe Highway, BOX – 268, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia

Keywords:

criminal community, the fight against organized crime, the leaders of the criminal world, “thieves in law”, “thieves’ world”, the criminalization of society

Abstract

This article addresses the enforcement problems of criminal responsibility of the leaders of the criminal world in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. The author draws attention to the fact that in these countries there is no legitimate legal regulation of the conceptual apparatus related to the topic of thieves in law, which significantly affects the work of law enforcement and judicial bodies in counteracting the creation of criminal communities (criminal organizations) in connection with which it is proposed, by analogy with the Law of the Republic of Georgia of 12 December 2005 No. 23-54-вc «On organized crime and racket», to develop unified standards to enhance interstate influence on the organized crime, with subsequent reciprocal implementation.

Author Biography

Alexander Y. Grishko, Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 3 Ankudinovskoe Highway, BOX – 268, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia

doctor of science (law), full professor; professor at the department of criminal and criminal-executive law

References

Ivanchin AV. [The occupation of a higher position in the criminal hierarchy (Article 2101 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) is an example of unjustified criminalization]. In: Lopashenko NA, editor. IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovye chteniya: ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeistvie i ego rolʼ v preduprezhdenii prestupnosti: sbornik statei po materialam IV Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 30 sentyabrya – 1 oktyabrya 2019 g.; Saratov, Rossiya [Criminal law impact and its role in crime prevention: 4th Saratov criminal law readings: a collection of articles based on the materials of the 4th All-Russian scientific and practical conference; 2019 September 30 – October 1; Saratov, Russia]. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii; 2019. p. 159–161. Russian.
Bykov VM. [Problems applying Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as amended by the Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 3 November 2009 No. 245-ФЗ]. Pravo i politika. 2011;1:99–105. Russian.
Grishko AYa. [A particularly qualifying sign of the creation of a criminal community (criminal organization)]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii. 2017;2:82–85. Russian.
Sukharenko A. [Disassembly at the ECHR]. Ezh-Yurist. 2014;5:535–542. Russian.
Goryainov KK, Ovchinsky VS, editors. Teoriya operativno-rozysknoi deyatel’nosti [The theory of operational investigative activity]. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2018. 762 p. Russian.
Burlakov VN. [The highest position in the criminal hierarchy as the basis of criminal liability]. In: Lopashenko NA, editor. IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovye chteniya: ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeistvie i ego rolʼ v preduprezhdenii prestupnosti: sbornik statei po materialam IV Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 30 sentyabrya – 1 oktyabrya 2019 g.; Saratov, Rossiya [4th Saratov criminal law readings: Criminal law impact and its role in crime prevention: a collection of articles based on the materials of the 4th All-Russian scientific and practical conference; 2019 September 30 – October 1; Saratov, Russia]. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii; 2019. p. 81–85. Russian.
Antonyan YuM, editor. Mnogokratnyi retsidiv prestuplenii [Multiple relapse of crime]. Ryazanʼ: Akademiya FSIN Rossii; 2019. 316 p. Russian.
Grishko AYa. Criminological characteristics of the person holding the highest position in the criminality (Part 4 of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2016;3:84–87. Russian.
[The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15 July 2014. Ashlarba v. Georgia]. Byulleten’ Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. 2014;11:81–85. Russian.