Genesis and development of interference of supranational into the national criminal procedural law

Authors

Keywords:

criminal procedure, criminal procedural law, international legal paradigm, harmonization of legislation, legal systems

Abstract

 

The article presents a vision of the international legal paradigm of the modern criminal procedure. According to the author, this paradigm has developed as a result of the internationalization of the criminal procedure and is a mediation in the criminal procedure legislation of the principles enshrined in international legal acts and the admission of the direct application of international treaties in the criminal procedure. The difficulty of allocating a time frame for the stages of development of the penetration of supranational into the national criminal procedure is noted since each state has passed and is passing its path of transformation of the criminal procedure. The author identifies five stages of such interference: 1) ensuring the unhindered activity of diplomatic agents; 2) consolidation of the legal institution of international legal assistance in criminal matters at the national level; 3) the implementation of universally recognized norms of human rights in the field of criminal procedure; 4) recognition of international judicial protection at the national level; 5) direct harmonization of criminal procedure law within the framework of a supranational organization.

Author Biography

  • Vadzim I. Samaryn, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (law), docent; associate professor at the department of criminal procedure and directorate of public prosecutions, faculty of law

References

  1. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoye sotrudnichestvo v bor’be s prestupnost’yu i pravovaya sistema RF [International cooperation in the fight against crime and the legal system of the Russian Federation]. Voronezh: Istoki; 1997. 176 p. Russian.
  2. Boitsov AI. Vydacha prestupnikov [Extradition of criminals]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press; 2004. 795 p. Russian.
  3. Volzhenkina VM. Vydacha v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Extradition in the Russian criminal procedure]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2002. 336 p. Russian.
  4. Litvin AA. Nekotoryye voprosy vydachi obvinyayemykh i osuzhdennykh lits v ramkakh okazaniya pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym delam [Some issues of extradition of accused and convicted persons as part of the provision of legal assistance in criminal matters]. Kazan’: Kazan State University; 2004. 40 p. Russian.
  5. Minkova YuV. Printsipy instituta vydachi (ekstraditsii) v mezhdunarodnom prave [The principles of the institution of extradition in international law]. Moscow: RUDN University; 2002. 86 p. Russian.
  6. Tolochko ON. [Extradition in international law and in the legislation of the Republic of Belarus]. Yustitsiya Belarusi. 2019;10:24–28. Russian.
  7. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Tom 2 [International law. Volume 2]. Moscow: Yurait; 2018. 309 p. Russian.
  8. Andreychik NI, editor. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Respubliki Belarus’ [Scientific and practical commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: The Academy of the Interior Ministry; 2014. 1231 p. Russian.
  9. Smirnov AV, Kalinovskii KB. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow: KNORUS; 2008. 704 p. Russian.
  10. Vashkevich AE. [Constitutional and legal institution of appeal to international bodies to protect the rights and freedoms of the individual]. In: Babkina EV, Vaskevich AE, editors. Aktual’nyye problemy mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Vypusk 3 [Current issues of international public and international private law. Issue 3]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2011. p. 5–15. Russian.
  11. Vasilevich GA. Konstitutsiya Respubliki Belarus’: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Constitution of the Republic of Belarus: scientific and practical commentary]. Minsk: State Institute of Management of Social Technologies BSU; 2005. 487 p. Russian.
  12. Plyakhimovich II. Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Respubliki Belarus’. Tom 1 [Commentary on the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus. Volume 1]. Minsk: Amalfey; 2015.1224 p. Russian.
  13. Chirkin VE. [Supranational law: main features]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017;2:131–137. DOI: 10.12737/24124. Russian.
  14. Kashkin SYu, editor. Integratsionnoye pravo [Integration law]. Moscow: Prospect; 2017. 720 p. Russian.
  15. Lando DD, Samarin VI. Yevropeyskoye publichnoye pravo [European public law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2015. 208 p. Russian.
  16. Bekyashev KA. [EAEU: an international (interstate) organization or an international (interstate) integration association? Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014;11(78):14–16. Russian.
  17. Stoiko NG. Ugolovnyy protsess zapadnykh gosudarstv i Rossii: sravnitel’noe teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie anglo-amerikanskoi i romano-germanskoi pravovykh sistem [The criminal process of Western states and Russia: a comparative theoretical and legal study of the Anglo-American and Romano-German legal systems]. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of Saint Petersburg State University; 2006. 264 p. Russian.
  18. Timokhov YuA. Inostrannoe pravo v sudebnoi praktike [Foreign law in judicial practice]. Moscow: Walters Cloover; 2004. 176 p. Russian.
  19. Bekyashev KA, editor. Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoye pravo [International public law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2008. 780 p. Russian.
  20. Löwe E, Herausgeber. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 111n. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1976. 196 S.
  21. Rieß P, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 111n. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1988. 1555 S.
  22. Rieß P, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 71. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1999. 1062 S.
  23. Becker JP, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2016. 1151 S.
  24. Lukashuk II. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Osobennaya chast’ [International law. The Special part]. Moscow: Walters Cloover; 2005. 554 p. Russian.
  25. Rochester JM. Fundamental principles of international relations. Boulder: Westview Press; 2010. 432 p.
  26. Golovko LV, editor. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [The course of the criminal process]. Moscow: Statute; 2017. 1280 p. Russian.
  27. Lazarev VA. Dokazyvaniye v ugolovnom protsesse [Proving in criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurayt; 2015. 359 p. Russian.
  28. Borulenkov YuP. Theory of evidence and evidencing: need to differentiate procedural cognition and evidencing]. Rossiyskii sledovatel’. 2017;6:3–8. Russian.
  29. Karnozova LM. Vvedeniye v vosstanovitel’noye pravosudie (mediatsiya v otvet na prestuplenie) [Introduction to restorative justice (mediation in response to crime)]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2014. 262 p. Russian.
  30. Safferling C. Die Rolle des Opfers im Strafverfahren - Paradigmenwechsel im nationalen und internationalen Recht? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft. 2010;122(1):87–116.
  31. Tsvetkov YuA. Procedural independence of the investigator in contemporary paradigm of pre-judicial proceedings]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’. 2014;14:52–56. Russian.
  32. Wortley BA. The interaction of public and private international law today. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. 1954;85:239–338.
  33. Pushmin EA. [The system of Soviet law and the prospects for its development. Round table of the journal «Soviet State and Law»]. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo. 1982;8:105–106. Russian.
  34. Sіl’chanka MU. Tjeoryja krynic belaruskaga prava [A theory of sources of Belarusian law]. Hrodna: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2012. 253 p. Belarusian.
  35. Danilevich AA, Petrova OV, Samaryn VI. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal procedure]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. 351 p. Russian.
  36. Lukashuk II. [The Constitution of Russia and international law]. Moscow Journal of International Law. 1995;2:29–41. Russian.
  37. Kant I. [Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason]. In: Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii v vos'mi tomakh. Tom 6 [Collected works in eight volumes. Volume 6]. Moscow: CHORO; 1994. p. 5–222. Russian.
  38. Golovko LV. [Criminal proceedings in the face of the latest ideological challenges]. In: Azemsha SYa, editor. Formirovanie effektivnoi ugolovnoi politiki i optimal’noi modeli dosudebnogo proizvodstva – prioritetnaya zadacha yuridicheskoi nauki i praktiki. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 25–26 aprelya 2019 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Formation of an effective criminal policy and an optimal model of pre-trial proceedings is a priority task of legal science and practice. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference; 2019 April 25–26; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: YurSpektr; 2019. p. 201–205. Russian.
  39. Langer M. La portée des categories accusatoire et inquisitoire. Revue de Sciences Criminelle et de Droit Penal Compare. 2014;4:707–728.
  40. Danilevich AA, Samaryn VI. Mezhdunarodnaya pravovaya pomoshch’ po ugolovnym delam: ugolovno-protsessual’nyi aspekt [International legal assistance in criminal matters: the criminal procedural aspect]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. 127 p. Russian.
  41. Kant I. Pervoye vvedeniye v kritiku sposobnosti suzhdeniya. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. primenenii teleologicheskikhprintsipov v filosofii. Ideya vseobshchei istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane. K vechnomu miru. Predpolagayemoe nachalo chelovecheskoi istorii [First introduction to the critique of judgment. Critique of judgment. On the application of teleological principles in philosophy. The idea of world history in a worldwide civilian way. Perpetual peace. The alleged beginning of human history]. Saint Petersburg: Science; 2001. 512 p. Russian.
  42. Lukashuk II, Naumov AB. Mezhdunarodnoye ugolovnoye pravo [International criminal law]. Moscow: Spark; 1999. 287 p. Russian.
  43. Turaev BA. Istoriya Drevnego Vostoka [History of the Ancient East]. Minsk: Harvest; 2002. 752 p. Russian.
  44. Foinitsky II. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tom 2 [The course of criminal proceedings. Volume 2]. Saint Petersburg: Al’fa; 1996. 605 p. Russian.
  45. Grützner H, Pötz P-G. Auslieferungsgesetz (Belgien), 1. Oktober 1833. In: Grützner H, Pötz P-G, Kreß C, Gazeas N, Herausgeber. Internationaler Rechtshilfeverkehr in Strafsachen. Heidelberg: R. V. Decker; 1986. S. 1–2.
  46. Rodionov KS. [The law of the Russian Empire of 1911 on extradition]. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003;7:80–91. Russian.
  47. Grajewski J, Paprzycki LK, Płachta M. Kodeks postępowania karnego. Tom 2. Komentarz do art. 425–673 KPK. Kraków: Zakamycze; 2003. 814 s.
  48. Marchenko MN, Deryabina EM. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [The theory of state and law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017. 720 p. Russian.
  49. Strogovich MS. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Tom 1. Osnovnye polozheniya nauki sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [The course of the Soviet criminal process. Volume 1. The main provisions of the Soviet criminal procedure science]. Moscow: Science; 1968. 470 p. Russian.
  50. Bekeshko SP, Matvienko EA, editors. Ugolovnyi protsess BSSR [The criminal process of the BSSR]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 1979. 542 p. Russian.
  51. Sidorenko MV. [The principle of the presumption of innocence in the Soviet criminal process (1960–1980s) and the political reasons for its incomplete legislative consolidation]. Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2009;1:38–39. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-27

Issue

No. 2 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law

Section

Сriminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

How to Cite

[1]
Samaryn, V.I. 2020. Genesis and development of interference of supranational into the national criminal procedural law. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law. 2 (Oct. 2020), 66–77.