Some problematic issues of the study of trasyanka: some results of the Oldenburg project

  • Siarhiej M. Zaprudski Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The article deals with problems of the identification of trasyanka with regard to the existing discourse, primarily in connection with the concluding article «Eleven questions and answers about the Belarusian-Russian mixed speech (“Trasyanka”)» published by Gerd Hentschel, head of the Oldenburg project for the study of the Belarusian-Russian mixed speech. Terminology used in the area of research, definitions of trasyanka, the problem of its coming into existence, as well as research methods are discussed. At the final stage of the project the key term was changed. The term «trasyanka» was replaced with the expression «Belarusian-Russian mixed speech» which had some dubious results since the latter concept is too broad. The object of producing a common definition of trasyanka was not set during the development of the linguistic part of the project, which narrowed the heuristic potential of this part. The postulated emergence of trasyanka in the 18th century, which is rightly disputed by the leader of the Oldenburg project, raises doubts due to the lack of reliable information about the Belarusian language as used at the end of the 18th ‒ 19th century, and by other methodological difficulties associated with the fact that Belarusian language did not have a stable form and was found in permanent dynamics during this and especially subsequent periods. The very definition of a certain type of the Belarusian speech as a mixed one given by either the scientific community or any significant social group could appear no earlier than the establishment of a discourse on literary languages with its inherent concept of norm, the emergence and socialisation of the culture of speech discipline, as well as a more or less developed national consciousness. In the process of developing methods for the linguistic qualification of the language material by means of the quantitative methodology, which by itself was an obvious achievement of the project, the necessity to take into account – simultaneously and «inclusively» – all main parameters related to different language levels became a problematic aspect. The qualification of the language material was largely based on the existing normative and, as a result, ideologised representations of the Belarusian language and as such was not fully adapted to the sociological part of the project. At present, due to a variety of reasons, a complete exploration of the sociological part of the project by Belarusian linguists is hardly possible.

Author Biography

Siarhiej M. Zaprudski, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (philology), docent; associate professor at the department of Belarusian linguistics, faculty of philology

References

  1. Zaprudski S. [Some remarks about the research of trasyanka or Challenges for Belarusian humanitarian and social sciences]. Arche Pachatak. 2009;11–12(86–87):157–200. Belarusian.
  2. Zaprudski S. Zur öffentlichen Diskussion der weißrussischen Sprachkultur, zum Aufkommen des Terminus «Trasjanka» und zur modernen Trasjankaforschung. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 119–141.
  3. Woolhiser C. The sociolinguistic study of language contact and bilingualism in the former Soviet Union: the case of Belarus. In: Harlig J, Pléh C, editors. When East met West: Sociolinguistics in the former socialist bloc. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1995. p. 63–88.
  4. Cychun HA. [Trasyanka as an object of linguistic study]. In: Pryhodzic MR, editor. Belaruskaja mova w drugoj palove XX stagoddzja. Matjeryjaly Mizhnarodnaj navukovaj kanferjencyi; 22–24 kastrychnika 1997 g.; Minsk, Belarus [Belarusian language in the second half of the 20th century. Proceedings of the International scientific conference; 1997 October 22–24; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 1998. p. 83–89. Belarusian.
  5. Cychun H. [The creolised product. Trasyanka as an object of linguistic study]. Arche Pachatak. 2000;6(11):51–58. Belarusian.
  6. Mjachkowskaja NB. [Trasyanka in the continuum of Belarusian-Russian idiolects: who and when speaks trasyanka?]. Vesnik BDU. Seryja 4. Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 2007;1:91–97. Belarusian.
  7. Ramza T. [Trasyanka: national and precedent phenomenon or «key word of the present moment»?]. Belaruskaja dumka. 2010;7:112–116. Russian.
  8. Mjachkowskaja NB. [In a linguist laboratory of professor Hentschel: methods and results of trasyanka study]. Vesnik BDU. Seryja 4. Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 2013;2:62–69. Belarusian.
  9. Stern D. Review of: Hentschel G, Taranenko A, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. 394 p.). Acta Slavica Iaponica. 2017;38:133–144.
  10. Hentschel G, Tesch S. [Trasyanka: to what degree is it «Russian», «Belarusian» or «common»?]. Vesnik BDU. Seryja 4. Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 2007;1:85–91. Belarusian.
  11. Hentschel G, Zaprudski S, editors. Belarusian trasyanka and Ukrainian suržyk: structural and social aspects of their description and categorization. Oldenburg: BIS; 2008. 133 p.
  12. Hentschel G, editor. Variation und Stabilität in Kontaktvarietäten: Beobachtungen zu gemischten Formen der Rede in Weißrussland, der Ukraine und Schlesien. Oldenburg: BIS; 2013. 107 S.
  13. Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. 394 S.
  14. Tesch S. Syntagmatische Aspekte der weißrussisch-russischen gemischten Rede: Kodemischen und Morphosyntax. Oldenburg: BIS; 2014. 268 S.
  15. Zeller JP. Phonische Variation in der weißrussischen «Trasjanka». Sprachwandel und Sprachwechsel im weißrussisch-russischen Sprachkontakt. Oldenburg: BIS; 2015. 491 S.
  16. Menzel Th, Hentschel G. Flexionsmorphologische Irregularität im innerslavischen Sprachkontakt. Sprachinhärente Präferenzen oder politisch-soziale Dominanz: Russisch vs Weißrussisch / Ukrainisch-Polnisch vs Kaschubisch / Lemkisch. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2017. 371 S.
  17. Kittel B, Lindner D, Brüggemann M, Zeller JP, Hentschel G. Sprachkontakt – Sprachmischung – Sprachwahl – Sprachwechsel. Eine sprachsoziologische Untersuchung der weißrussisch-russisch gemischten Rede «Trasjanka» in Weißrussland. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2018. 338 S.
  18. Cychun H. Soziolinguistische, soziokulturelle und psychologische Grundlagen gemischten Sprechens. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 163–172.
  19. Ramza T. Die Evolution der Trasjanka in literarischen Texten. Zeitschrift für Slawistik. 2008;53(3):305–325. DOI: 10.1524/slaw.2008.0022.
  20. Klimaw IP. [Transformation of the Belarusian dialects: theoretic prospects of study]. In: Antropau MP, editor. Belaruskaja mova w kul’turnaj i mownaj prastory Slavii. Matjeryjaly Mizhnarodnaj navukovaj kanferjencyi; 24–25 listapada 2009 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Belarusian language in cultural and linguistic space of Slavia. Proceedings of the International scientific conference; 2009 November 24–25; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Prava i ekanomika; 2009. p. 250–254. Belarusian.
  21. Mečkovskaja NB. Die weißrussische Trasjanka und der ukrainische Suržyk: Quasi-ethnische, russifizierte Substandards in der Geschichte der sprachlichen Situation. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 53–90.
  22. Klimaŭ I. Trasjanka und Halbdialekt: Zur Abgrenzung von Phänomenen der parole und der langue. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 173–192.
  23. Liankevič A. Die Einstellung zu den gemischten sprachlichen Kodes in Weißrussland (am Material eines matched guise-Tests). In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 233–252.
  24. Cychun H. Studien zur «Trasjanka». Oldenburg: BIS; 2013. 53 S.
  25. Hentschel G. [Belarusian-Russian mixed speech («trasjanka»): eight questions and answers]. In: Belarusian State University. Jazykovoi kontakt [Language contact]. Minsk: National Institute for Higher Education; 2015. p. 171–186. Russian.
  26. Hentschel G. Eleven questions and answers about Belarusian-Russian mixed speech («Trasyanka»). Russian Linguistics. 2017;41(1):17–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11185-016-9175-8.
  27. Hentschel G. [Eleven questions and answers about Belarusian-Russian mixed speech («trasyanka»)]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. 2017;1(33):209–250. Russian.
  28. Mechkovskaya NB. [Belarusian trasyanka as the apple of discord and as the whetstone of the method]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveschenii. 2018;1(35):226–250. Russian.
  29. Barkovich AA. [Russian-Belarusian cross-lingual interference and trasyanka: computer-mediated verification and scientific reflection]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2021;69:5–28. Russian.
  30. Masenko L. [Surzhik: the history of formation, actual state, prospects of functioning]. In: Hentschel G, Zaprudski S, editors. Belarusian Trasjanka and Ukrainian Suržyk: structural and social aspects of their description and categorization. Oldenburg: BIS; 2008. p. 1–37. Ukrainian.
  31. Moser M. How it all began: Ukrainian-Russian «surzhyk» in eighteenth-century sources from the Hetmanate. In: New Contributions to the History of the Ukrainian Language. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press; 2016. p. 138–168.
  32. Besters-Dilger J. [Convergence and divergence of Slavic languages. The influence of sociolinguistic factors in the past and in modernity]. V: Kurek H, redaktor. Języki słowiańskie w ujęciu socjolingwistycznym: prace przygotowane na XV Międzynarodowy Kongres Slawistów; 20–27 sierpień 2013; Mińsk, Belarus. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka; 2012. s. 9–22. Russian.
  33. Mikhnevich AE, editor. Russkii yazyk v Belorussii [Russian language in Belorussia]. Minsk: Nauka i technika; 1985. 272 p. Russian.
  34. Makarjevich V. Mova drobnaj shljahty Belarusi w XIX st. [Language of the landed gentry in Belarus in the 19th century]. Studia Bialorutenistyczne. 2012;6:255–263. Belarusian.
  35. Bieder H. Die weißrussisch-russische Mischsprache (Trasjanka) als Forschungsproblem. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 91–118.
  36. Bilaniuk L. A typology of surzhyk: mixed Ukrainian-Russian language. International Journal of Bilingualism. 2004;8(4):409–425. DOI: 10.1177/13670069040080040101.
  37. Gustavsson S. Byelorussia. In: Goebl H, Nelde PH, Starý Z, Wölck W, editors. Halbband: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Band 2. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton; 1997. S. 1919–1926.
  38. Gustavsson S. Belarus: a multilingual state in Eastern Europe. In: Gustavsson S, Runblom H, editors. Language, Minority, Migration. Yearbook 1994/1995 from the Centre for Multiethnic Research. Uppsala: Centre for Multiethnic Research; 1995. p. 39–74.
  39. Hentschel G. [About work of the Commission for the study of language contacts at the International committee of slavists]. In: Dulichenko A, Gustavsson S, Dunn J, editors. Slavica Tartuensia VII. Slavyanskie literaturnye mikroyazyki i yazykovye kontakty. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, organizovannoi v ramkakh Komissii po yazykovym kontaktam pri Mezhdunarodnom komitete slavistov; 15–17 sentyabrya 2005 g.; Tartu, Estoniya [Slavica Tartuensia VII. Slavic literary microlanguages and language contacts. Materials of the International conference organized within the framework of the Commission on language contacts under the International Committee of Slavists; 2005 September 15–17; Tartu, Estonia]. Tartu: Tartu university; 2006. p. 17–21. Russian.
  40. Golovko EV. Code-switching or new code? Trudy fakul’teta etnologii. 2001;1:298–316. Russian.
  41. Zinkevych A, Prenner MK, Kittel B, Lindner D, Brüggemann M, Zeller JP, Hentschel G. Sprachkontakt – Sprachmischung – Sprachwahl – Sprachwechsel. Eine sprachsoziologische Untersuchung der weißrussisch-russisch gemischten Rede «Trasjanka» in Weißrussland. Movoznavstvo. 2019;5:73–79. Ukrainian.
  42. Jaspers J. Diglossia and beyond. In: Garcia O, Flores N, Spotti M, editors. The Oxford handbook of language and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 179–198.
  43. Bilaniuk L. Conflicting epistemologies in the study of mixed languages. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 27–30.
  44. Hentschel G, Tesch S. «Trasjanka»: Eine Fallstudie zur Sprachmischung in Weißrussland. In: Stern D, Voss Chr, editors. Marginal Linguistic Identities. Studies in Slavic contact and borderland varieties. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz; 2006. S. 213–243.
  45. Stern D. Die Trasjanka und die Regiolektalisierung des Russischen in Weißrußland. Zeitschrift für Slawistik. 2013;58(2):169–192.
  46. Hentschel G, Zeller JP. Gemischte Rede, gemischter Diskurs, Sprechertypen: Weißrussisch, Russisch und gemischte Rede in der Kommunikation weißrussischer Familien. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. 2012;70:127–155.
  47. Martinet A. La double articulation linguistique. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague. 1949;5:30–37.
  48. Hentschel G. [Some differences and similarities in the mixed Belarusian-Russian speech of various speakers in various Belarusian towns]. In: Zaprudski SM, Cychun GA, editors. Novae slova w belarusistycy. Movaznawstva [A new word in Belarusian studies. Linguistics]. Minsk: Chatyry chvjerci; 2012, p. 220–232. Russian.
  49. Hentschel G. Belarusian and Russian languages and Belarusian-Russian mixed speech. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2013;1:53–76. Russian.
  50. Hentschel G. Zur weißrussisch-russischen Hybridität in der weißrussischen «Trasjanka». In: Kosta P, Weiss D, editors. Slavistische Linguistik 2006/2007: Referate des XXXII Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Männedoff bei Zürich, 18–20 September 2006, und Referate des XXXIII Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Potsdam 4–6 September 2007. Gerd Freidhof ruz 65. Geburstag gewidmet. München: Otto Sagner; 2008. S. 169–219.
  51. Chambers J. Sociolinguistics of immigration. In: Britain D, Cheshire J, editors. Social Dialectology. In honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2003. p. 97–114.
  52. Matras Y. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 366 p.
  53. Hentschel G. Zwischen Variabilität und Regularität, «Chaos» und Usus: Zu Lautung und Lexik in der weisrussisch-russischen gemischten Rede. In: Hentschel G. Variation und Stabilität in Kontaktvarietäten. Beobachtungen zu gemischten Formen der Rede in Weißrussland, der Ukraine und Schlesien. Oldenburg: BIS; 2013. S. 63–99.
  54. Hentschel G. Regular variation or «chaos»: the question of usus in a mixed linguistic varieties – the case of Belarusian «trasyanka». Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2016;6:84–112. Russian.
  55. Hentschel G. Belarusian «trasyanka» and Ukrainian «surzhyk»: the main differences in the degree of Russian influence. Przegląd Rusycystyczny. 2018;2(162):190–206. Russian.
  56. Hentschel G, Kittel B. Weißrussische Dreisprachigkeit? Zur sprachlichen Situation in Weißrussland auf der Basis von Urteilen von Weißrussen über die Verbreitung «ihrer Sprachen» im Lande. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. 2011;67:107–135.
  57. Bieder H. Die gegenwärtige sprach- und kulturpolitische Entwicklung in Weißrußland. Die Welt der Slaven. 1992;37:142–168.
  58. Auer P. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In: Delbecque N, van der Auwera J, Geeraerts D, editors. Perspectives on variation: sociolinguistic, historical, comparative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2005. p. 7–42. DOI: 10.1515/9783110909579.7.
  59. Bullock BE, Toribio AJ. Themes in the study of code-switching. In: Bullock BE, editor. The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 1–17.
  60. Hentschel G. Die weißrussische «Trasjanka» und der ukrainische «Suržyk»: grundlegende quantitativ-qualitative soziolinguistische Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede. In: Kempgen S, Wingender M, editors. Deutsche Beitrage zum 16. Internationalen Slavistenkongress Belgrad 2018. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz; 2018. S. 127–138.
  61. Auer P. Language mixing and language fusion: when bilingual talk becomes monolingual. In: Besters-Dilger J, Dermarkar C, Pfänder S, Rabus A, editors. Congruence in contact-induced language change. language families, typological resemblance, and perceived similarity. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2014. p. 294–333. DOI: 10.1515/9783110338454.294.
  62. Hentschel G, Taranenko O. Bilingualism or tricodalism: Ukrainian, Russian and «suržyk» in Ukraine. Analysis and linguistic-geographical mapping. Die Welt der Slaven. 2021;66(2):268–299.
  63. Trudgill P. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell; 1986. 174 p.
  64. Hentschel G. On the development of inflectional paradigms in Belarusian trasyanka: the example of demonstrative pronouns. In: Hentschel G, Zaprudski S, editors. Belarusian trasyanka and Ukrainian suržyk. Structural and social aspects of their description and categorization. Oldenburg: BIS; 2008. p. 99–133.
  65. Moreno FF, Moreno FJ. Madrid perceptions of regional varieties in Spain. In: Long D, Preston D, editors. Handbook of perceptual dialectology. Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2002. p. 295–320.
  66. Kryvicki AA. The heritage of J. F. Karski in Belarusian dialectology. Bielaruskaja linhvistyka. 1982;21:18–24.
  67. Nosovich II. [Memoirs about my life]. Neman. 1997;4:194–254. Russian.
  68. Yanchuk NA. Po Minskoi gubernii (zametki iz poezdki v 1886 godu) [Along Minsk province (remarks from the 1886 trip)]. Moscow: Tipografiya A. Levenson i K°; 1889. 130 p. Russian.
  69. Danylenko A. Iazychie and surzhyk: mixing languages and identities in the Ukrainian borderlands. In: Kamusella T, Nomachi M, Gibson C, editors. The Palgrave handbook of Slavic languages, identities and borders. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. p. 81–100.
  70. Sloboda M. [Categories «trasyanka» and «českoslovenština» as discursive objects: their origin and use in modern Belarusian-Russian and Slovak-Czech discourses]. In: Zaprudski SM, Cychun HA, editors. Movaznawstva. Matjeryjaly IV Mizhnarodnaga kangrjesa belarusistaw «Belaruskaja kul’tura w kantjeksce kul’tur ewrapejskih krain»; 6–9 chjervenja 2005 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Linguistics. Proceedings of the IV International congress of Belarusians «Belarusian culture in the context of European cultures; 2005 June 6–9; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Limaryus; 2010. p. 190–200. Belarusian.
  71. Nábělková M, Sloboda M. «Trasyanka» and «českoslovenčina» (Czechslovak) as discursive emic categories: history and current usage. In: Hentschel G, Taranenko O, Zaprudski S, editors. Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014. S. 31–52.
  72. Scherba LV. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatelnost’ [Linguistic system and speech activity]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1974. 427 p. Russian.
  73. Lippi-Green R. Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in society. 1994;23(2):163–198.
  74. Nekrashjevich C, Ignatowski U, editors. Pracy Akadjemichnae kanferjencyi pa rjeforme belaruskaga pravapisu i azbuki; 14–21 listapada 1926 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Proceedings of the academic conference on the reform of the Belarusian spelling and alphabet; 1926 November 14–21; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Instytut belaruskaj kul’tury; 1927. 423 p. Belarusian.
  75. Mickevich K. Metodyka rodnae movy [Native language techniques]. Minsk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva Belarusi; 1926. 139 p. Belarusian.
  76. Padluzhny AI. [Introduction]. In: Burlyka VR, Burlyka IR, Vygonnaja LT, Losik GV, Padluzhny AI, Rusak VP, editors. Vusnaja belaruskaja mova [Oral Belarusian language]. Minsk: Navuka i tjehnika; 1990. p. 3–18. Belarusian.
  77. Tolstoi NI. Istoriya i struktura slavyanskikh literaturnykh yazykov [The history and structure of Slavic literary languages]. Moscow: Nauka; 1988. 239 p. Russian.
  78. Dingley J. Ukrainian and Belorussian – a testing ground. In: Kirkwood M, editor. Language planning in the Soviet Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1989. p. 174–189.
  79. Grynblat MJa. [Proverbs and sayings]. In: Fjadosik AS, editor. Prykazki i prymawki. Tom 1 [Proverbs and sayings. Volume 1]. Minsk: Navuka i tjehnika; 1976. p. 5–48. Belarusian.
  80. Hentschel G, Brandes O. Zur Morphologie der anaphorischen Pronomen in der gemischten weißrussisch-russischen Rede. In: Berger T, Giger M, Kurth S, Mendoza I, editors. Von grammatischen Kategorien zu sprachlichen Weltbildern – die Slavia von der Sprachgeschichte bis zur Politsprache. München: Kubon & Sagner; 2009. S. 199–214.
  81. Suprun AE. Soderzhanie obucheniya russkomu yazyku v belorusskoi shkole [The content of teaching the Russian language in the Belarusian school]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 1987. 228 p. Russian.
  82. Woolard KA. Codeswitchind and Comedy in Catalonia. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics. 1987;1(1):106–122. DOI: 10.1075/iprapip.1.1.04woo.
  83. Madsen LM. Heteroglossia, voicing and social categorisation. In: Blackledge A, Creese A, editors. Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 41–58. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_3.
Published
2022-03-09
Keywords: trasyanka, mixed speech variety, scientific discourse about trasyanka, language contact, Belarusian language, Russian language, Oldenburg project on the Belarusian-Russian mixed speech, Gerd Hentschel
How to Cite
Zaprudski S. M. Some problematic issues of the study of trasyanka: some results of the Oldenburg project // Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2022. 1. PP. 70-92.
Issue
No 1 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology
Section
Discussions

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)