Communicative functions of syntactically indivisible utterance «Good» (based on the material of the Slavic languages)

-

Authors

  • Hanna P. Latushka Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

Keywords:

agreement, communicative function, interjection, Slavic languages, speech act of agreement, syntactically indivisible utterance, syntax

Abstract

Communicative functions of syntactically indivisible utterance Good in the Belarusian, Ukrainian, Czech and Bulgarian languages were considered. The classification of agreement was created and the groups of agreement that include Good (for example, hurried agreement, agreement with reassurance, approval, agreement with doubt, etc.) were described. Syntactically indivisible utterance Good together with alternants and semantic equivalents was presented. Contexts of usage Good based on the material of dramaturgic works were adduced also. The features of Good usage in each of the analyzed language were described. Conclusions about similarity and differences of Good functioning in the Slavic languages were made, polyfunctionality of utterance was demonstrated. The results of the work were summarized in the table which represent syntactically indivisible utterance Good, its alternants and the groups of agreement in which they were detected for each of the analyzed language.

Author Biography

  • Hanna P. Latushka, Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of theoretical and Slavic linguistics, faculty of philology

References

  1. Norman BJ. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika (na materiale russkogo i drugikh slavyanskikh yazykov) [Linguistic pragmatics (based on the material of Russian and other Slavic languages)]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. Russian.
  2. Ramza TR. Belaruskae gutarkovae mawlenne: suchasny stan [Belarusian colloquial speech: the current state]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 2011. Belarusian.
  3. Dougal AV. Srodki vyrazhjennja jemocyj u suchasnaj belaruskaj move [Ways to express emotions in the modern Belarusian language]. Minsk: Tjehnalogija; 2008. Belarusian.
  4. Zur GI. [Interjection utterances of the Belarusian language through the prism of lingua-pragmatics]. Vesnik Polackaga dzjar- zhawnaga universitjeta. Seryja A: Gumanitarnyja navuki [Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Series A: Humanities]. 2013;10:111–114. Belarusian.
  5. Lyankevich AU. Belaruski vyklichnik u Secive [Belarusian interjection on the web]. Minsk: Prava i jekanomika; 2009. Belarusian.
  6. Kiselyov IA. Chastitsy v sovremennykh vostochnoslavyanskikh yazykakh [Particle in the modern East Slavic languages]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 1976. Russian.
  7. Latushka HP. Disagreement in the context of effective communication (based on the material of Belarusian dramaturgic works). Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2017;3:73–78. Belarusian.
  8. Melikyan VY. Emotsional’no-ekspressivnye oboroty zhivoi rechi [Emotional-expressive locutions in live speech]. Moscow: Flinta; 2001. Co-published by the «Nauka». Russian.
  9. Zemskaya EA. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’: lingvisticheskii analiz i problemy obucheniya [Russian colloquial speech. Linguistic analysis and learning problems]. Moscow: Flinta; 2011. Co-published by the «Nauka». Russian.
  10. Sharonov IA. Communicatives as a functional class and an object of lexicographic description. Rusistika segodnya [Russian philology today]. 1996;2:89 –111. Russian.
  11. Baranov AN, Krejdlin GE. The structure of the dialogue: lexical markers of the minimal dialogues. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics]. 1992;3:84 –93. Russian.
  12. Shirokova AG, Adamec P, Vlchek I. Cheshskii yazyk [The Czech language]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1988. Russian.
  13. Karlík P, Nekula M, Pleskalová J. Encyklopedický slovník češtiny [Encyclopedic dictionary of the Czech Language]. Praga: Folk newspaper; 2002. Czech.
  14. Mathesius V. [About systematic grammatical analysis]. In: Kondrashov NA, compiler, editor. Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok [Prague school]. 1967. p. 226 –238. Russian.
  15. Mathesius V. [An attempt to create theory of structural grammar]. In: Kondrashov NA, compiler, editor. Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok [Prague school]. 1967. p. 196 –209. Russian.
  16. Cholakova K. Rechnik na bŭlgarskiya ezik. Tom 1. A–B [Dictionary of the Bulgarian language. Volume 1. A–B]. Sofia: Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 1977.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

Issue

No. 3 (2018): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology

Section

Linguistics

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Latushka, H.P. 2019. Communicative functions of syntactically indivisible utterance «Good» (based on the material of the Slavic languages): -. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 3 (Mar. 2019), 100–109.