The specifics of narrative in the discourse of Svetlana Alexievich: pro et contra

Authors

Keywords:

fact, narrative event, historical event, system of semiotic signs, cultural memory, meta genre

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of genre definition of Svetlana Alexievich’s works. An overview of the research position on the above issue is proposed. The author demonstrates the views of both Belarusian and foreign scientists, who unanimously declare the absence of pure documentaries in the creation of S. Alexievich. At the same time, it is emphasized that modern literary critics do not have a clear position for determining the genre of the writer’s works. Hybrid genre and meta-genre are terms which are currently operational with the regard to the abovementioned problem. It is proved that the presence of elements of artistry in the writer’s discourse is an obvious feature of her way of narration. Taking into account the idea of meta-artistic fact in the context of a literary work, the specificity of naration in the discourse of S. Alexievich is investigated. The role of fact in the author’s text of the writer is analyzed. Using the semiotic methodology, a narratological analysis of the structure of its texts is carried out. As a result of this analysis, it is concluded that the final product of the writer is the sum of contexts that connect a real fact of the past (a historical event), the same fact in a reinterpreted form (a narrative event) and the new content of these phenomena transformed through the prism of the author’s consciousness. It is proved that the works of Svetlana Alexievich are texts in the text, which gives them a special narrative specificity. A double treatment of the fact becomes obvious: first directly in the mind of the narrator – a participant in real historical events, then in the mind of a specific author who interprets the narrative event into narration and his own discourse. As a result, a system of codes is formed, which the writer uses to give her texts a new cultural meaning. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the discovery of a new cultural meaning in the works that made up S. Alexievich’s pentateuch «Voices of Utopia».

Author Biography

  • Olga N. Gubskaya, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

    PhD (philology), docent; head of the department of Belarusian and Russian languages

References

  1. Desjukevich OI. Conceptual journalism of Svetlana Alexievich: genre’s crystallization. Media Lingvistics. 2017;17(2):31−40. Russian.
  2. Lysova NB. The documentary utopia: oxymoron or «Dark light». Notice works Svetlana Alexievich in the context of the literary and artistic process. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya A. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016;10:89−94. Belarusian.
  3. Sin’kova L. [«True literature»: fact and fiction in a literary work]. In: Butyrchyk GM, editor. Slavjanskija litaratury w kantjeksce susvetnaj: da 750-goddzja z dnja naradzhjennja Dantje Alig’ery i 85-goddzja Uladzimira Karatkevicha. Matjeryjaly XII Mizhnarodnaj navukovaj kanferjencyi; 22–24 kastrychnika 2015 g.; Minsk, Belarus’. Chastka 1 [Slavic literature in the global context: to the 750th anniversary of Dante Alighieri and the 85th anniversary of Uladzimir Karatkevich. Proceedings of the 12th International scientific conference; 2015 October 22–24; Minsk, Belarus. Part 1]. Mіnsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. p. 40–47. Belarusian.
  4. Sinkova LD. Bielaruskaja «zvyshlitaratura» [Belarusian «superliterature»]. Minsk: Knigazbor; 2019. 224 р. Belarusian.
  5. Sivakova NA. [The specifics of the evolution of non-fiction in the twentieth century]. Vesnik Mazyrskaga dzjarzhawnaga pedagagichnaga wniversitjeta imja I. P. Shamjakina. Filalagichnyja navuki. 2014;3:139−143. Russian.
  6. Tratsiak ZI. Specific understanding of the concept of war in the documentary-f ictional cycle «Voices of utopia» by S. Alexievich. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2019;3:31−39. Belarusian.
  7. Anninskij LA. [Look back in tears: God and man in the apocalypses of Svetlana Alexievich]. Knizhnoe obozrenie. 1998;21:8−9. Russian.
  8. Górska K. The work of Svetlana Alexievich in the context of the history of documentary fictional prose («Boys of zinc»). Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Zhurnalistika. 2017;2(22):291−301. DOI: 10.22363/ 2312-9220-2017-22-2-291-301. Russian.
  9. Krylov VN. «The document must live in harmony with the laws of art» (the history of «domestic» socialism in «Second-hand time» by Svetlana Aleksievich). Filologiya i kul’tura. 2014;3(37):250−253. Russian.
  10. Sonu Sajni. [«Chernobyl prayer: chronicle of the future» S. Alexievich. The problem of genre]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. 2013;2(10):17−22. Russian.
  11. Kuca Z. [Artistic and documentary prose by Svetlana Alexievich on the example of the book «Zinc boys»]. Lyublinskie issledovaniya v oblasti sovremennykh yazykov i literatury. 2018;42(2):20−34. Russian.
  12. Siho Majeda. [Narrative and representation of women in war. The myth of war and journalism S. Alexievich war does not have a woman’s face]. In: Grechko V, Su Kvan Kim, Susumu Nonaka, editors. Dal’nii Vostok, blizkaya Rossiya. Evolyutsiya russkoi kul’tury – vzglyad iz Vostochnoi Azii [The Far East: the evolution of Russia culture – a view from East Asia]. Belgrad: Logos; 2015. p. 184−198. Russian.
  13. Mestergazi EG. Literatura non-fikshn. Jeksperimental’naja jenciklopedija [Non-fiction literature. Experimental encyclopedia]. Moscow: Sovpadenie; 2007. 327 p. Russian.
  14. Gej NK. [Metartistic literature]. In: Kasatkina TA, editor. Teoriya literatury. Tom 1 [Meta-fiction of literature. Theory of literature. Volume 1]. Moscow: A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2005. 335 p. Russian.
  15. Romanova SV. Originality of art-documentary meta-genre in modern Russian-language prose of Belarus. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2020;1:24–36. Russian.
  16. Aleksіevіch SA. U vajny ne zhanochy tvar [War’s unwomanly face]. Akudovich V, translator. Mіnsk: Lohvіnau; 2018. 366 p. Belarusian.
  17. Aleksіevіch SA. Chas sjekand-hjend [Second-hand time]. Dubavec S, translator. Mіnsk: Lohvіnau; 2018. 490 p. Belarusian.
  18. Lotman Ju. Vnutri mysljashhih mirov [Inside the thinking worlds]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka; 2018. 448 p. (Azbukaklassika. Non-fiction). Russian.
  19. Jurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [It was forever, until it was over. The last Soviet generation]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2019. 604 p. Russian.
  20. Aleksіevіch SA. Aposhnіja svedkі [Last witness]. Pjatrovich B, translator. Mіnsk: Lohvіnau; 2018. 312 p. Belarusian.
  21. Aleksіevіch SA. Cynkavyja hlopchyki [Zinc boys]. Hadanovich A, translator. Mіnsk: Lohvіnau; 2018. 350 p. Belarusian.
  22. Adamovіch A, Bryl’ Ja, Kalesnik U. Ja z vognennaj vjoskі [I’m from the fire village]. Mіnsk: Mastackaja lіtaratura; 1975. 448 p. Belarusian.

Published

2021-03-05

How to Cite

[1]
Gubskaya, O.N. 2021. The specifics of narrative in the discourse of Svetlana Alexievich: pro et contra. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 1 (Mar. 2021), 14–24.