Studying of old Belarusian literature in the context of literary canonization

Authors

  • Zhanna V. Nekrashevich-Karotkaja Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

old Belarusian literature, teaching literature, literary canon, academic and research canon, curriculum in literature, works of fiction, aporematic and canonical discourses, forced canonization

Abstract

This article examines the current issues of teaching of old Belarusian literature of the XI–XVIII centuries that arise from the secondary school and higher education curricula. The examination is done from the viewpoint of the literary canon discussions that have been wide and considerable in the humanities discourses of the West and East since the end of the XX century. It reports an obvious bias within the academic canon (particularly, a lack of the XVIII century literature in the secondary school curriculum), instances of the transformation of the aporematic discourse into canonical, and a high level of existing informationeclecticity together with alow level of knowledge systematization. It proposes a vector change from a «postulated» («ideal») to an «active» («real»), from «sense-based» to «design-based» canon; a disavowal of the enduring tradition of compiling normative reading lists as the goal of the curriculum. It suggests the importance of an adequate author identification of a literary text and claims the necessity to take into account the objectives of creating epistemological profiles of each literary epoch.

Author Biography

  • Zhanna V. Nekrashevich-Karotkaja, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (philology), docent; professor at the department of the history of Belarusian literature, faculty of philology

References

  1. Guillory J. Cultural Capital. The Problems of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago ; London : Univ. of Chic. Press, 1993.
  2. Loskutova M. [National literary canon in secondary school]. In: Nov. lit. obozr. [New lit. rev.]. 2001. No. 51. P. 2–13 (in Russ.).
  3. Malygin E. [Literature as a subject in the Soviet school oft he 1920s and 1930s. To from oft he literary canon]. Bamberg : Univ. of Bamb. Press, 2012 (in Ger.).
  4. Adamovich G. [Slavic world as the center of the literary canon]. In: Movaznawstva. Litaratura. Kul’turalogija. Fal’klarystyka [Linguistics. Literature. Culturology. Folclore] : rep. of the Belarus. deleg. at the XIII Int. Slav. congr. (Ljubljana, 2003). Minsk, 2003. P. 229–245 (in Belarus.).
  5. Winko S. [Canon literary]. In: Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie. Ansätze – Personen – Grundbegriffe [Metzler lexicon literary and cultural theory. Approaches – personalities – basic terms]. Stuttgardt ; Weimar, 2009. P. 344–345 (in Ger.).
  6. Heydebrand R. von. [Canon – authority – culture. Try of the summary]. In : Kanon – Macht – Kultur. Theoretische, historische und soziale Aspekte ästhetischer Kanonbildungen [Canon – authority – culture. Theoretical, historical and social aspects canon formation]. Stuttgart ; Weimar, 1998. P. 612–625 (in Ger.).
  7. Bernsmeier H. [Effects oft he canonization, classics reading, written exams]. In: Kanon und Literaturgeschichte. Facetten einer Diskussion [Canon and literary history. Facets of a discussion]. Frankfurt am Main, 2014. P. 129–144 (in Ger.).
  8. Jampolskii M. [The literary canon and the theory of a strong author]. Inostr. lit. [Foreign lit.]. 1998. No. 12. P. 214–222 (in Russ.).
  9. Lotman Y. [On the content and structure of the «fiction» concept]. In: Izbr. stat’i [Sel. articles] : in 3 vols. Tallinn, 1992. Vol. 1. P. 203–216 (in Russ.).
  10. Kisjalova L. [Belarusian literature of the XVIII–XIX centuries: theoretical and communicative aspects of the study]. In: Pracy kafedry gistoryi belaruskae litaratury Beldzjarzhuniversitjeta [Proceeding of the department of history of Belarusian literature of BSU]. Minsk, 2008. Issue 2. P. 66–81 (in Belarus.).
  11. Bourdieu P. Das literarische Feld. Die drei Vorgehensweisen In: Pinto L.,Schultheis F. (eds). Streifzüge durch das literarische Feld [Forays through the literary field]. Konstanz, 1997. P. 33–147 (in Ger.).
  12. [Belarusian Literature: 5–11 classes] : curric. for inst. of gen. second. educ. with Belarus. and Russ. lang. Minsk : Nacyjanalʼny instytut adukacyi, 2012 (in Belarus.).
  13. Kavaljow S. [Multilingual Renaissance-poetry of the Grand Duchy of Lithuanian] : monograph. Minsk : Knigazbor, 2010 (in Belarus.).
  14. Navumovich U. [Belarusian literature]. Minsk : Vyshjejshaja shk., 2007 (in Belarus.).
  15. Stuck E. [Canon and literature studies. Theoretical, historical and empirical studies on the academic handinf of reading recommendations]. Paderborn : Mentis, 2004 (in Ger.).
  16. Hermann L. [Canon and present. Theory and practice of literary canon in terms of historicity, dynamics and plurality]. In: Kanon und Literaturgeschichte. Facetten einer Diskussion [Canon and literary history. Facets of a discussion]. Frankfurt am Main, 2014. P. 15–32 (in Ger.).
  17. Karotki U. G. [Epochs and styles in ancient East Slavic literatures (discussion problems of literary terminology)]. In: Belaruskaja litaratura i gistoryja [Belarusian literary and history]. Minsk, 2013. P. 7–21 (in Belarus.).
  18. Mal’dzis A. I. [At the crossroads of Slavic traditions: the literature of Belarus in the transitional period (the second half of the XVII–XVIII century)]. Minsk : Navuka i tjehnika, 1980 (in Belarus.).
  19. Antalogija belaruskaj paezii [Antology of Belarusian poetry] : in 3 vols. Minsk : Mastackaja litaratura, 1993. Vol. 1 (in Belarus.).
  20. Barthes R. [From the work to the text]. In: Euvres completes [Complete works]. Vol. III. 1968–1971. [Paris], 2002. Р. 900–916 (in Fr.).
  21. Maldzis A. J. [Literature of the late Baroque]. In : Gistoryja belaruskaj litaratury XI–XIX stagoddzjaw [History of the Belarusian literature of the XI–XIX centuries] : in 2 vols. Minsk, 2006. Vol. 1 : [Ancient literature: XI – the first of a half of the XVIII century]. P. 824–855 (in Belarus.).
  22. Garecki M. [History of Belarusian literature]. 2 nd ed., emended. Vil’nja : Drukarnja Vilenskaga vydavectva B. Kleckina, 1921 (in Belarus.).
  23. Akhrymenka P., Larchanka M. [Ancient Belarusian Literature]. Minsk : Vyshjejshaja shk., 1968 (in Belarus.).
  24. McMillin A. Die Literatur der Weißrussen: a history of Byelorussian literature from its origins to the present day. Giessen : Wilhelm Schmitz Verl., 1977 (in Ger.).
  25. Mal’dzis A. [How our ancestors lived in the XVIII century]. Minsk : Mastackaja litaratura, 2001 (in Belarus.).
  26. Schindler A. [What you must have read – and what is read. Middle Hight German literature yesterday and today]. In: Kanon und Literaturgeschichte. Facetten einer Diskussion [Canon and literary history. Facets of a discussion]. Frankfurt am Main, 2014. P. 207–228 (in Ger.).
  27. Bourdieu P. [Teaching systems and thought systems]. In: Rev. Int. Sci. Soc. 1967. No. 19. P. 367–388 (in Fr.).

Published

2019-02-28

How to Cite

[1]
Nekrashevich-Karotkaja, Z.V. 2019. Studying of old Belarusian literature in the context of literary canonization. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 1 (Feb. 2019), 5–13.