Language tools for creating an image of the addressee in the epistolary texts of B. Pasternak

Authors

  • Tatsiana V. Ziamlianik Institute of Border Troops of the Republic of Belarus, 4 Slavinskaha Street, Minsk 220103, Belarus; Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

language tools, addressee’s image, epistolary text, B. Pasternak, E. Pasternak, M. Tsvetaeva, Z. Pasternak, O. Freidenberg, appeal, attributive lexemes, substantive lexemes

Abstract

The language tools for creating the recipient’s image in B. Pasternak’s letters to E. Pasternak, M. Tsvetaeva, Z. Pasternak, O. Freidenberg are revealed. Presented and characterized appeals (in the initial and middle positions), attributive and substantive lexemes, which are the most significant elements of the language when creating the image of the addressee. The attributive lexemes, deliberately selected by the author to create a certain communicative image, are revealed and described. They acquire different meanings depending on the lexical-semantic and grammatical environment and give the image of the addressee certain features inherent only in him. It is established that when creating an image of an addressee, the author actively uses abstract nouns. They are introduced into the text to characterize the positive traits of the recipient’s personality, reflect the author's vision and perception, and participate in the realization of such a method of influencing the addressee as praise.

Author Biography

  • Tatsiana V. Ziamlianik, Institute of Border Troops of the Republic of Belarus, 4 Slavinskaha Street, Minsk 220103, Belarus; Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    senior lecturer at the department of social and humanitarian disciplines, Institute of Border Troops of the Republic of Belarus; postgraduate student at the department of Russian language, faculty of philology,  Belarusian State University

References

  1. Kuryanovich A. V. Zhanrovo-stilisticheskie osobennosti russkogo epistolyariya pervoi treti KhKh veka: uzus i idiostil’ [Genrestylistic features of the Russian epistolary of the first third of the twentieth century: usage and idiostyle]. Tomsk : Publ. house of TSPU, 2013 (in Russ.).
  2. Formanovskaya N. I. Rechevoe obshchenie: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii podkhod [Speech communication: communicative and pragmatic approach]. Moscow : Russ. yazyk, 2002 (in Russ.).
  3. Pasternak B. L. Perepiska Borisa Pasternaka [Correspondence of Boris Pasternak]. Moscow : Khudozh. lit., 1990 (in Russ.).
  4. Pasternak B. L. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii s prilozheniyami [Complete works with applications] : in 11 vols. Vol. 7. [Letters from 1905 to 1926]. Moscow : Slovo, 2005 (in Russ.).
  5. Kovtunova I. I. Poeticheskii sintaksis [Poetical syntax]. Moscow : Nauka, 1986 (in Russ.).
  6. Fedulova U. M. Stylistic functions of circulation. Vestnik Leningr. gos. univ. imeni A. S. Pushkina. Filologiya [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin. Philology]. 2014. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 239–224 (in Russ.).
  7. Sadrieva K. E. The aesthetic significance of adjectives in the language of A. Serafimovich’s prose fiction. Uch. zap. Kazan. univ. 2015. Vol. 157, issue 5. P. 218–226 (in Russ.).
  8. Donetskih L. I. Realizatsiya esteticheskikh vozmozhnostei imen prilagatel’nykh v tekste khudozhestvennykh proizvedenii [Realization of aesthetic possibilities of the names of adjectives in the text of works of art]. Kishinev : Shtiintsa, 1980 (in Russ.).
  9. Vsevolodova M. V. [Use of full and short adjectives]. Russ. yazyk za rubezhom [Russian language abroad]. 1972. No. 1. P. 59–64 (in Russ.).
  10. Kotov A. A. Ethno-Specificity of a Grammatical Phenomenon in Russia. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gos. univ. [Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University]. 2011. Vol. 2, No. 4. P. 66–69 (in Russ.).

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

[1]
Ziamlianik, T.V. 2019. Language tools for creating an image of the addressee in the epistolary texts of B. Pasternak. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2 (Mar. 2019), 94–102.