Amateur creativity as a self-representative practice of Soviet culture 1930–60s

Authors

  • Nastassia A. Hulak Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts, 17 Rabkaraŭskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

Keywords:

folklore studies, amateur art, criticism, legend, new author, Soviet identity, administration of folklore studies

Abstract

The article retraces the formation of an extensive and inherently unique project known as «Soviet folklore» in sociocultural discourse of Belarus that served as a self-representative practice of soviet culture. The work describes archival materials that characterize social status of actors of Soviet oral tradition, their artistic and literary critical reflexion. In particular, an original legend by amateur author from West Polesie are analyzed in terms of how a person of traditional folk culture perceives and interprets the historical war events. The article makes conclusions about the nature of Soviet amateur oral tradition. It is being proved that it is based on deactivation of the collectivity as one of ontological characteristics of folklore and its replacing with an imaginary sole author role; it has emerged because of administration of folklore studies, and can be characterized by its citationality, reduced artistic reflection, and loss of ties with folklore and language tradition. The main provisions of the discussion in academic science of the 1950–60s, which was devoted to revealing the essence of Soviet folklore, are considered.

Author Biography

  • Nastassia A. Hulak, Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts, 17 Rabkaraŭskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

    PhD (philology); associate professor at the department of directing, faculty of traditional Belarusian culture and contemporary art

References

  1. Miller F. Stalinskii fol’klor [Stalin’s folklore]. Saint Petersburg: Аkademicheskij proekt; 2006. 188 p. Co-published by the «DNK». Russian.
  2. Toporkov AL, Ivanova TG, Lapteva LP, Levkievskaya EE, compilers. [On the folklore and pseudo-folk nature of the Soviet epic]. Rukopisi, kotorykh ne bylo: Poddelki v oblasti slavyanskogo fol’klora [Manuscripts that were not: fakes in the field of Slavic folklore]. Moscow: Ladomir; 2002. p. 403–432. Russian.
  3. Vasilenok S. [For the advanced science of folk epic art]. Novyi Mir. 1954;8:226–237. Russian.
  4. Kruglova T. Iskusstvo sotsrealizma kak kul’turno-antropologicheskaya i khudozhestvenno-kommunikativnaya sistema: istoricheskie osnovaniya, spetsifika diskursa i sotsiokul’turnaya rol’ [Socialist realism art as a cultural anthropological and artistic communication system: historical grounds, discourse specifics and sociocultural function; dissertation abstract]. Ekaterinburg: A. M. Gorky Ural State University; 2005. 46 p. Russian.
  5. Hutarau ІV. [About modern Belarusian folklore]. In: Hutarau IV, Hlebka P, editors. Suchasny belaruski fal’klor [Modern Belarusian folklore]. Minsk: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the BSSR; 1963. p. 5–20. Belarusian.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-09

How to Cite

[1]
Hulak, N.A. 2019. Amateur creativity as a self-representative practice of Soviet culture 1930–60s. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 2 (Aug. 2019), 93–101.