Development models of the dialogue with privacy invasion elements

Authors

  • Anna V. Zhupinskaya Minsk State Linguistic University, 21 Zacharava Street, Minsk 220034

Keywords:

media interview, privacy, invasion strategy, defense strategy, dialogue model, basic model, complicated variant of model, mixed model

Abstract

The article considers the development of the dialogue that contains privacy invasion (violation of personal borders) conducted by the journalist and appropriate response realised by the interviewee. The research is made on the basis of Russian and English media interviews. The aim of the study is to identify typical development models of the dialogue with privacy violation elements. The models can be identifed according to interviewee’s reaction to privacy invasion and interviewer’s degree of persistence. The article states that the dialogue with privacy invasion elements develops according to four basic models, three of which can be further complicated by inclusion of question-answer cycles in their structure. Besides the mixed dialogue model is identifed. The mixed model combines elements of basic models. Comparative analysis proved that dialogue models are identical in Russian and English media interviews. Also a general algorithm of the dialogue with privacy invasion elements was created.

Author Biography

  • Anna V. Zhupinskaya, Minsk State Linguistic University, 21 Zacharava Street, Minsk 220034

    postgraduate student at the department of general linguistics

References

  1. Jorgensen MV, Phillips LJ. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publication; 2002. 230 p. Russian edition: Fillips L, Iorgensen MV. Diskurs-analiz: teoriya i metod. Kiseleva AA, translator. Kharkiv: Gumanitarnyi tsentr; 2004. 336 p.
  2. Sakhnova EB. Genre of interview and its modifcations. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Filologiya. Zhurnalistika. 2013;4:98–103. Russian.
  3. Plüss B. Non-cooperation in dialogue. In: Demir S, Raab J, Reiter N, Lopatkova M, Strzalkowski T, editors. 48 th Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Proceedings of the student research workshop; 2010 July 13; Uppsala, Sweden. Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010. p. 1–6.
  4. Yablonovskaya NV, Mustafaeva ND, Ezyk AV. The genre of interview on the platform of the Russian-language segment of YouTube: transformation and mediatechnology. Scientifc Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philological Science. 2020;4:225–238. Russian.
  5. Bochkov VA. [Integration of Western ideas in Russian television]. In: Tulupova VV, editor. Kommunikatsiya v sovremennom mire. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Problemy massovoi kommunikatsii»; 10–12 maya 2007 g.; Voronezh, Rossiya [Communication in modern world. Proceedings of the National scientifc conference «Problems of mass communication»; 2007 May 10–12; Voronezh, Russia]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University; 2007. p. 191–193. Russian.
  6. Il’chenko SN. Interv’yu v zhurnalistike: kak eto delaetsya [Interview in journalism: how it is done]. Saint Petersburg: School of Journalism & Mass Communications; 2016. 236 p. Russian.
  7. Antonova LG, Bashlovkina YA. Communicative toolkit of the modern form of the interview on YouTube platform. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya. 2018;4(3):35–43. Russian.
  8. Issers OS. [Provocative strategy in public dialog]. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory. 2009;2: 92–104. Russian.
  9. Stepanov VN. [Provocative question from the point of view of linguistic pragmatics]. Moskovskii lingvisticheskii zhurnal. 2003;6–2:157–180. Russian.
  10. Karasik VI, Prokhvacheva OG, Zubkova YaV, Grabarova EV. Inaya mental’nost’ [Foreign mentality]. Moscow: Gnozis; 2005. 352 p. Russian.
  11. Bogoyavlenskaya YuV. Representativeness of text corpus: method of verifcation of data reliability. Political Linguistics. 2016;4:163–166. Russian.
  12. Solove DJ. Understanding privacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008. 276 p.
  13. McLean D. Privacy and its invasion. London: Praeger; 1995. 152 p.
  14. Zhupinskaya AV. [A strategy for responding to violation of the boundaries of personal communication space in Russian-language and English-language media interviews]. In: Starovoitova IA, editor. Sbornik nauchnykh rabot studentov Respubliki Belarus’ «NIRS 2020» [Collection of scientifc works of students of the Republic of Belarus «NIRS 2020»]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2021. p. 475–479. Russian.
  15. Naumova MM. Specifc features of realisation of frankness in the mass-mediated discourse. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Filologiya. Zhurnalistika. 2015;15–1:107–110. Russian.
  16. Dubsky AI. Epatage tactics as the means of provocative self-promotion in «star» interviews. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics. 2012;25:109–112. Russian.
  17. Zhupinskaya AV. Redistribution of communicative roles as privacy defense in media interviews. In: Dostanko EA, editor. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya i professional’no orientirovannoe obuchenie inostrannym yazykam. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu obrazovaniya Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 29 oktyabrya 2021 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Intercultural communication and professionally oriented teaching of foreign languages. Proceedings of the 15th International scientifc conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Belarusian State University; 2021 October 29; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2021. p. 96–101. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-22

Issue

No. 1 (2023): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology

Section

Linguistics

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Zhupinskaya, A.V. 2023. Development models of the dialogue with privacy invasion elements. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 1 (Feb. 2023), 69–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6775-2023-1-69-79.