The use of foreign loanwords in their euphemistic function in contemporary Spanish
Keywords:
foreign loanword, euphemisation, euphemistic function, lexical distancing, stylistic neutralisation, evaluative semantics, discursive context, contemporary SpanishAbstract
This article examines foreign loanwords in modern Spanish that function as euphemisms in socially and evaluatively sensitive semantic areas. The results of a semantic-stylistic and pragmatic analysis of borrowed lexemes used to name realities related to sexuality and prostitution, professions and social status, economics and business communication, physicality and physiology, culture, leisure and consumption, as well as marginality and deviant behaviour are presented. It has been established that foreign borrowings are systematically used as a means of lexical distancing and stylistic neutralisation, contributing to a reduction in evaluative explicitness and a reinterpretation of socially sensitive concepts. It has been shown that the euphemistic potential of borrowed units is dynamic in nature and may weaken as they become integrated into the language system. This study clarifies the role of foreign borrowings in the formation of socially acceptable ways of linguistic representation of reality in contemporary Spanish discourse and is significant for lexicological and lexicographical practice.
References
- Allan K, Burridge K. Euphemism and dysphemism: language used as shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. 263 p.
- Вайнрайх У. Одноязычие и многоязычие. Жолковский АК, переводчик. В: Розенцвейг ВЮ, составитель и редактор. Новое в лингвистике. Выпуск 6, Языковые контакты. Москва: Прогресс; 1972; с. 25– 60.
- Thomason SG, Kaufman T. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Bercley: University of California Press; 1988. 411 p.
- Гийомy Ж, Мальдидье Д. О новых приемах интерпретации, или проблема смысла с точки зрения анализа дискурса. Юдина ИЮ, переводчик. В: Серио П, составитель; Серио П, Мазо ВД, редакторы. Квадратура смысла: французская школа анализа дискурса. Москва: Прогресс; 1999. с. 124 –136.
- Ullmann S. The principles of semantics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1957. 346 p.
- Chambers JK. Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003. 320 p. (Language in society).
- Rodríguez González F, Lillo Buades A. Nuevo diccionario de anglicismos. Madrid: Gredos; 1997. 562 p.
- Lorenzo Criado E. Anglicismos hispánicos. Madrid: Gredos; 1996. 710 p.
- Rodríguez González F. Eufemismo y propaganda política. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses. 1988;1:153 –170.
- Casas Gómez M. De una visión léxica y pragmático-discursiva a una dimensión cognitiva en la caracterización extralingüística y lingüística del eufemismo. In: Bonhomme M, de La Torre M, Horak A, editors. Études pragmatico-discursives sur l’euphémisme = Estudios pragmático-discursivos sobre el eufemismo. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2012. p. 53 –72. (Studien zur romanischen sprachwissenschaft und interkulturellen kommunikation; band 83).
- Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies. 2013;7(2):177–197. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.798239.
- van Dijk TA. Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage; 1997. XII, 356 p. (Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction; volume 1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)











