The reception of Ciotka’s works in the first half of the 20th century and the question of attribution of the poem «Mužyckaja dola»

Authors

Keywords:

reception, attribution, literature process, revolutionary pathos, biographical method, psychoideology, vulgar socialism

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the reception of the work of Aloiza Pashkevich (Ciotka) (1876–1916), the rooting of ratings and her establishment in the literary process. The object of study are the publications of critics and theorists of literature dedicated to Ciotka for the period 1918 to 1950. The subject is the problems of interpretation of the literary and journalistic texts of the writer, the features of the preparation and publication of collections of her works for the specified period, as well as the issue of attribution of the poem «Mužyckaja dola». Have been introduced into scientific use and archival materials were used, that’s help to shed light on the circumstances of the preparation and publication of the posthumous collection of Ciotka.

Author Biographies

  • Igor N. Zaprudski, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (philology), docent; associate professor at the department of history of Belarusian literature, faculty of philology

  • Daria V. Korchashkina, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus; The State Museum of the History of Belarusian Literature, 13 M. Bahdanoviča Street, Minsk 220029, Belarus

    master's degree student at the faculty of philology, Belarusian State University, and  research assistant of the Literary Museum of Piatruś Broŭka 

References

  1. Kawalenka VA. Vytoki. Uplyvy. Paskoranasc’. Razviccjo belaruskaj litaratury XIX–XX stagoddzjaw [Origins. Influence. Acceleration: Belarusian literature development of the 19th–20th centuries]. Minsk: Navuka i technika; 1975. 336 p. Belarusian.
  2. Luckevich A. Vybranyja tvory. Prablemy kul’tury, litaratury i mastactva [Selected works: problems of culture, literature and art]. Sidarevich A, compiler. Minsk: Knigazbor; 2006. 460 p. Belarusian.
  3. Lotman YuM. Kul’tura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Moscow: Gnosis; 1992. 272 p. Russian. Co-published by the «Progress».
  4. Karski EF. Belorusy. Tom 3, kniga 2. Ocherki slovesnosti belorusskogo plemeni [Belarusians. Volume 3, part 2. Sketches of the tribe of the Belarusian literature]. Vabishchevich TI, Kazberuk VM, Krichko OP, editors. Minsk: Belorusskaya entsiklopediya imeni Petrusya Brovki; 2007. 704 p. Russian.
  5. Garecki M. Gistoryja belaruskae litaratury [History of the Belarusian literature]. Golub TS, compiler. Minsk: Mastackaja litaratura; 1992. 479 p. Belarusian.
  6. Adamovich A. Da gistoryi belaruskae litaratury [To history of Belarusian literature]. Minsk: Z. Kolas; 2005. 1464 p. Belarusian.
  7. Piotuhovich M. Narysy gistoryi belaruskaj litaratury. Chastka 1. Agljad litaraturna-idjeoljogichnyh plynjaw XIX i pachatku XX v. [Essays on the history of Belarusian literature. Part One: Overview of literary and ideological currents during the 19th and early 20th century]. Miensk: Belaruskaje dzjarzhawnae vydavectva; 1928. 209 p. Belarusian.
  8. Bende L. [Ciotka]. In: Bende L. Litaratura. Hrjestamatyja dlja sjarjednjaj shkoly. Chastka 1 (shosty god). Darjevaljucyjnaja litaratura [Literature. Anthology for high school. Part 1 (sixth year). Pre-revolutionary literature]. Miensk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva Belarusi. 1933. p. 146. Belarusian.
  9. [From the Institute of literature and art of the Belarusian academy of sciences]. In: Zamocin II, editor. Tvory Cjotki (Aloizy Pashkevich) [Ciotka (Alois Pashkevich) composition]. Minsk: Vydavectva Belaruskaj akadjemii navuk; 1934. p. 5–6. Belarusian.
  10. Pjatrovich N. [Preface]. In: Zamocin II, editor. Tvory Cjotki (Aloizy Pashkevich) [Ciotka (Alois Pashkevych) composition]. Minsk: Vydavectva Belaruskaj akadjemii navuk; 1934. p. 7–17. Belarusian.
  11. Bahrag L. [Ciotka]. In: U dapamogu nastawniku (zbornik artykulaw pa belaruskaj litaratury) [To help teachers (Collection of articles on the Belarusian literature)]. Minsk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva pry SNK BSSR; 1940. p. 11–16. Belarusian.
  12. Bahrag L. [Ciotka poetry: to the 25th anniversary of her death]. Litaratura i mastactva. 1941 January 4.
  13. Larchanka M. [Alois Ciotka (to the 25th anniversary of her death)]. Zvjazda. 1941 February 5. Belarusian.
  14. Borisenko V. [El. Ciotka (to the 25th anniversary of his death)]. Sovetskaya Belorussia. 1941 February 5. Russian.
  15. Larchanka M. [Ciotka (Alois Pashkevich)]. In: Ciotka. Vybranyja tvory [Selected compositions]. Minsk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva BSSR; 1941. p. 3–14. Belarusian.
  16. Klimkovich M. [The first Belarusian poet]. Polymja. 1946;5:115–132. Belarusian.
  17. Bende L. [New documents about Ciotka (on her 70th birthday)]. Litaratura i mastactva. 1946 July 13. Belarusian.
  18. Bende L. [Unknown Ciotka composition]. Belarus. 1947;6:25. Belarusian.
  19. Barysenka V, Gutaraŭ I. [Theses on the major issues of development of Belarusian literature and art]. Vesci Akademii navuk BSSR. 1948;6:199–220. Belarusian.
  20. Kommunisticheskaya partiya Belorussii v rezolyutsiyakh i resheniyakh s’ezdov i plenumov TsK. Tom 4. 1945–1955 [The Communist Party of Belarus in the resolutions and decisions of the congresses and plenums of the Central Committee. Volume 4. 1945–1955]. Minsk: Belarus; 1986. 616 p. Russian.
  21. Gutaraŭ IV. [Against Cosmopolitanism in literary criticism, literary criticism and folklore of BSSR]. Vesci Akademii navuk BSSR. 1949;3:31–39. Belarusian.
  22. Klimkovich M. Ciotka. In: Ciotka. Vybranyja tvory [Selected compositions]. Minsk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva BSSR; 1949. p. 5–49. Belarusian.
  23. Arabei L. Cjotka (Alaiza Pashkevich): krytyka-bijagrafichny narys [Ciotka (Alois Pashkevich): criticism and biographical sketches]. Minsk: Dzjarzhawnae vydavectva BSSR; 1956. 160 p. Belarusian.
  24. Brouka P. Zbor tvoraw. Tom 9. Jepistaljarnaja spadchyna (1933–1980). Letapis zhyccja i tvorchasci [Collected works. Volume 9. Epistolary heritage (1933–1980). Chronicles the life and creativity]. Mushynski MI, Shamiakina AI, editors. Minsk: Mastackaja litaratura; 1992. 350 p. Belarusian.
  25. Semashkevich RM. Belaruski litaraturna-gramadski ruh u Pecjarburze (kanec XIX – pachatak XX st.) [Belarusian literary and social movement in Saint Petersburg (the end of 19th – early 20th century)]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 1971. 136 p. Belarusian.
  26. Bagdanovich IE. Avangard i tradycyja: belaruskaja pajezija na hvali nacyjanal’naga adradzhjennja [Avant-garde and tradition: Belarusian poetry in the wake of national renaissance]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2001. 387 p. Belarusian.
  27. Haŭstovich M. Dasledavanni i matjeryjaly: litaratura Belarusi XIX – pachatku XX stagoddzja. Tom 5 [Research and materials: Literature of Belarus in 19th and early 20th century. Volume 5]. Warszawa: Katedra Białorutenistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; 2018. 364 p. Belarusian.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-25

Issue

No. 1 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology

Section

Literary Research

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Zaprudski, I.N. and Korchashkina, D.V. 2020. The reception of Ciotka’s works in the first half of the 20th century and the question of attribution of the poem «Mužyckaja dola». Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philology. 1 (Feb. 2020), 37–48.