To the question on judicial examination of psychological signs of reliability of indications in criminal trial

Authors

  • Igor A. Fourmanov Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Igor E. Metlickij Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

sources of proofs, indications of suspects, the witnesses who have suffered, lie verification, signs of conscious insincerity

Abstract

In article on the basis of the analysis of modern legal and psychological approaches, prospects of application of a new kind of judicial examination – judicial examination of psychological signs of reliability of indications in criminal trial are considered. From a position of the system approach the structure of psychological criteria of an estimation of reliability of indications in criminal trial, proceeding from that functional loading which they bear in criminalistics and legal psychology is offered. The methodology of judicial examination of psychological signs of reliability of indications in criminal trial is theoretically proved.

Author Biographies

  • Igor A. Fourmanov, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (psychology), full professor; head of the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

  • Igor E. Metlickij, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (psychology), docent; associate professor at the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Engalychev VF, Kravtsova GK, Kholopova EK. Sudebnaya psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza po vyyavleniyu priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti informatsii, soobshchayemoy uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisyam sledstvennykh deystviy i operativno-razysknykh meropriyatiy) [The judicial psychological examination on revealing of signs of reliability/unauthenticity of the information informed by participants of criminal legal proceedings (on videorecordings of investigatory actions and operatively actions)]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2016. 328 s. Russian.
  2. Criminal procedure code of Republic of Belarus: adopt House of Representatives 1999 June 24: approved by Council of the Republic 1999 June 30: signed by President of Republic of Belarus 1999 Jule 16. No. 295-Z. Natsional’nyi reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus’. Minsk; 1999. Russian.
  3. Criminal code of Republic of Belarus: adopt Hause of Representatives 1999 June 2: approved by Council of the Republic 1999 June 24: signed by President of the Republic of Belarus 1999 Jule 9. No. 227-Z. Natsional’nyi reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus’. Minsk; 2003. Russian.
  4. Mekhrabiyan A. Psikhodiagnostika neverbalnogo povedeniya: praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Saint Petersburg: Rech; 2001. 256 p. Russian.
  5. Vraij A. Detecting lies and a deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 1999.
  6. Russian edition: Vraij A. Detektsiya lzhi i obmana. Ershova A, Isakova O, Kulakov A, translators. Saint Petersburg, Moscow: Praym-Evroznak; Neva, Olma-Press; 2005. 320 p.
  7. Ekman P, Friesen WV, Scherer KR. Body Movement and Voice Pitch in Deceptive Interaction. Semiotica. 1976;16:23–27.
  8. Simonenko SI. Psikhologicheskiye osnovaniya otsenki lozhnykh i pravdivykh soobshcheniy [The Psychological bases of an estimation of false and truthful messages] [dissertation]. Moscow: [publisher unknown]; 2003. 117 p. Russian.
  9. Obraztsov VA, Bogomolova SN. Ekspert-psiholog in court of Germany: an estimation of reliability of indications.
  10. Zakonnost’ [Legality]. 2003;1:50–52. Russian.
  11. Lenets AV. [Struktura and functions of lie from a linguistics position] Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Volgograd State Pedagogical University]. 2008;7:15–19. Russian.
  12. Ratinov AR. Sudebnaya psikhologiya dlya sledovateley [Judicial psychology for inspectors]. Moscow: VSh MOOP; 1967. 290 p. Russian.
  13. Dulov AV. Sudebnaya psikhologiya [Judicial psychology]. Minsk: Vysheyshaya shkola; 1975. Russian.
  14. Glazyrin FV. Psikhologiya sledstvennykh deystviy [Psychology of investigatory actions]. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR; 1983. Russian.
  15. Kavavleris A. [Limit of use of increase of efficiency of interrogation of the suspect accused]. In: Pombovskii RT, Krastynysh UD, Sheshukov MP, editors. Sovershenstvovaniye metodov borby s prestupnostyu [Perfection of methods of struggle against criminality]. Riga: [publisher unknown]; 1984. p. 81–92. Russian.
  16. Karneyeva LM. [Limit of use of tactical receptions of interrogation]. In: Takticheskiye priyemy doprosa i predely ikh
  17. ispolzovaniya [Tactical receptions of interrogation and limits of their use]. Moscow: Moscow State University; 1980. p. 5. Russian.
  18. Labunskaya VA. Psikhologiya ekspressivnogo povedeniya [Psychology of expressional behavior]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks; 1999. 608 p. Russian.
  19. Gelmanov AG, Gontar SA. Kak ustanovit uchastiye litsa v pravonarushenii? Effektivnyy i ekonomichnyy metod diagnostiki skryvayemoy prichastnosti i polucheniya priznaniya vinovnogo v otsutstviye dokazatelstv [As to establish participation of the person in an offence? An effective and economic method of diagnostics of hidden participation and reception of a recognition guilty for lack of proofs]. Moscow: Mozhayskiy poligraficheskiykombinat; 1999. 160 p. Russian.
  20. Konovalenko MYu. Obman v delovom obshchenii. Metody diagnostiki [The Deceit in business dialogue. Diagnostics methods]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks; 2005. 224 p. Russian.
  21. Bodalev AA. Vospriyatiye i ponimaniye cheloveka chelovekom [Perception and understanding of the person the person]. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1988. 200 p. Russian.
  22. Ekman P. Telling lies: Clues to Peceit in the Marketplace. Politics, and Marriage. New York: W. W. Norton; 2001.
  23. Russian edition: Ekman P. Psikhologiya lzhi. Isupova N, Mal’china N, Terekhova O, Mironov N, Mironov M et al., translators. Saint Petersburg: Piter: 2008. 272 s.

Published

2019-01-17

Issue

No. 3 (2018): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Section

Methods of Psychological Research

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Fourmanov, I.A. and Metlickij, I.E. 2019. To the question on judicial examination of psychological signs of reliability of indications in criminal trial. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 3 (Jan. 2019), 107–112.