The relationship of gender attitudes and career orientations of men and women at the initial stages of career building

Authors

Keywords:

gender attitude, career orientation, vertical career, horizontal career, sexism, normative gender attitude

Abstract

The influence of gender attitudes on the career building of men and women is analyzed in the article. The article reveals such phenomena as sexism, objectification, gender role conflicts, ect. These phenomena illustrate the relationship of gender attitudes and the professional realization of men and women. The results of the empirical study of the relationship between gender attitudes and career orientations of male and female students and young professionals are presented in the article. The vertical career orientation of men and women at the initial stages of career building is positively correlated with sexist attitudes towards women, normative attitudes towards men and the traditional differentiation of male and female roles.

Author Biographies

  • Yuliya S. Smirnova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (psychology), docent; associate professor at the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

  • Yuliya V. Zaitseva, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Fofanova GA, Smirnova YS. About directions of career guidance with schoolchildren and students in higher school. In: Popov LM, Shvedov NM, editors. Psihologicheskoe soprovozhdenie obrazovaniya: teoriya i praktika. Sbornik statey po materialam VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoyj konferencii; 28–30 dekabrya 2016 g.; Joshkar-Ola, Rossiya [Psychological support of education: theory and practice: materials of VII International scientific-practical conference; 2016 December 28–30; Yoshkar-Ola, Russia]. Yoshkar-Ola: Interregional Opened Social Institute; 2017. p. 377–384. Russian.
  2. Litvinova EYu. Protean career: perspectives of study. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2013;2(2):118–129. Russian.
  3. Haymovskaya NA, Bocharova AL. Socio-psychological aspects of professional identity in the modern society. Psychological Science Educational psyedu.ru . 2016;8(1):105–113. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2016080110. Russian.
  4. Derks B, Van Laar C, Ellemers N. The queen bee phenomenon: why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly. 2016;27:456–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007.
  5. Watkins MB, Kaplan S, Brief AP, Shull A, Dietz J, Mansfield M-T. Does it pay to be a sexist? The relationship between modern sexism and career outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2006;69(3):524–537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.07.004.
  6. Fredrickson BL, Roberts T-A. Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1997;21(2):173–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
  7. Kulagina NV. Intrapersonal gender conflict in occupational roles of men and women: the state of the problem and some ways to solve it. Psychologist. 2013;2:138–228. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.2.276. Russian.
  8. Zaitseva YV. Sexism toward women in science. In: Kazakova IV, editor. Zhenshchiny-uchenye Belarusi i Kazakhstana: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 1–2 marta 2018 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Women scientists of Belarus and Kazakhstan. Materials of International scientific-practical conference; 2018 March 1–2; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: National Institute of Higher Education; 2018. p. 45–47. Russian.
  9. Smirnova YS, Fofanova GA. [Role conflicts of female teachers]. In: Kazakova IV, editor. Rol’ zhenshchiny v razvitii sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 17–18 maya 2016 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [The role of women in the development of modern science and education: materials of International scientific-practical conference; 2016 May 17–18; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. p. 515–519. Russian.
  10. Blickenstaff JС. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education. 2005;17(4):369–386. DOI: 10.1080/09540250500145072.
  11. Smirnova YS. Modern forms of prejudices. Filosofiya i sotsial’nye nauki. 2008;4:72–75. Russian.
  12. Burova SN. Gendernye stereotipy v universitetskoi srede Minska [Gender stereotypes in university environment of Minsk]. Minsk: Unipack; 2015. 28 p. Russian.
  13. Rakitskaya AV. [The influence of gender stereotypes and sexism on professional self-realization of women in management]. In: Rakitskaya AV, Mitrofanova OG, editors. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologii razvitiya lichnosti [Actual problems of the psychology of personal development]. Grodno: Janka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2017. p. 286–291. Russian.
  14. Roshchin SY, Solntsev SA. Kto preodolevaet «steklyannyi potolok»: vertikal’naya gendernaya segregatsiya v rossiiskoi ekonomike [Who overcomes «glass ceiling»: vertical gender segregation in Russian economy]. Moscow: State University – Higher School of Economics; 2006. 52 p. Russian.
  15. Ryan MK, Haslam SA. The glass cliff: exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. The Academy of Management Review. 2007;32(2):549–572. DOI: 10.2307/20159315.
  16. Oshchepkov AY. [Gender wage gap in Russia]. Higher School of Economics Economic Journal. 2006;10(4):590–619. Russian.
  17. Zhdanovich AA. [Readaptation «Career Orientation Inventory» questionnaire and its standardization on the students sample]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2007;4:4–22. Russian.
  18. Schukina MA, Zizevskaia ES. The method of psychological diagnosis of the Sexism structure. In: Zhuravlev AL, editor. Fundamental’nye i prikladnye issledovaniya sovremennoi psikhologii: rezul’taty i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy nauchnoi. konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 45-letiyu Instituta psikhologii RAN i 90-letiyu ego sozdatelya B. F. Lomova; 16–17 noyabrya 2017 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and development prospects: materials of scientific conference; 2017 November 16–17; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. p. 888–896. Russian.
  19. Kletsina IS, Ioffe EV. Russian version of the Male Attitude Norms Inventory: the results of primary approbation. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013;6(32):6. Russian.
  20. Ermolaeva ЕP. Otsenka realizatsii professionala v sisteme «chelovek – professiya – obshchestvo» [Evaluation of professional realization in the system «person – profession – society»]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2011. 176 p. Russian.
  21. Rudenko OI. Correlates of self-objectification and characteristics of mental health among young women [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 January 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/7578. Russian.
  22. Navol’skaya DV. Features of the gender stereotypes’ influence on the choice of the military profession. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena. 2009;105:176–179. Russian.
  23. Tishchenko YG. Gendernye stereotipy sovremennoi studencheskoi molodezhi: sotsiologicheskii analiz [Gender stereotypes of modern students: a sociological analysis] [dissertation]. Stavropol’: Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University; 2014. 187 p. Russian.
  24. Zaitseva YV. [The structure of gender attitudes of women and men at the initial stages of career building]. Molodoi uchenyi. 2018;35:76–82. Russian.
  25. Gulevich OA. Psikhologiya mezhgruppovykh otnoshenii [Psychology of intergroup relations]. Moscow: Moscow Psycho-Social Institute; 2008. 432 p. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-17

How to Cite

[1]
Smirnova, .Y.S. and Zaitseva, Y.V. 2019. The relationship of gender attitudes and career orientations of men and women at the initial stages of career building. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 3 (Oct. 2019), 82–90.