Dynamics of religiosity among followers of Islam in the contemporary Belarus: between canon and everyday life
Keywords:
religious tradition, Islam, canon, religiosity, everyday life, non-canonical meanings, non-religious meanings, other-religious meanings, para-religious meaningsAbstract
A multidimensional, dynamic interpretation of religiosity is proposed. Using the author’s applied tools, the author identifies the characteristics of adherence to monotheistic religions’ traditions in modern secular, culturally and informationally open societies. Based on applied research data, the specific receptivity of followers of one monotheistic religion of Belarus (Islam) to non-religious, other-religious, and para-religious (i. e. non-monotheistic) meanings is determined. A correlation between the followers’ of Islam to non-canonical meanings and their gender and age is noted.
References
Карасёва СГ. Типология религиозности в современной Беларуси. Минск: БГУ; 2018. 219 с.
Карасёва С. Социально-антропологическая обусловленность религии. Наука и инновации. 2023;4:25–27. EDN: RIHDKO.
Stone A, McDermott MR, Abdi A, Cornwell B, Matyas Z, Reed R, et al. Development and validation of the multi-dimensional questionnaire of scientifically unsubstantiated belief. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018;128:146–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.024.
Tobacyk JJ. А revised paranormal belief scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2004;23(1):94–98. DOI: 10.1037/t14015-000.
Григорьев ДС. Адаптация и валидизация шкалы веры в паранормальное Дж. Тобасика. Социальная психология и общество. 2015;6(2):132–145. EDN: TYRPNB.
Реут ЕВ, Шкурова ЕВ. Особенности приверженности различным формам магических представлений (на основе апробации авторской методики исследования). Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология. 2024;2:47–59. EDN: HISPQC.
Armstrong RL. The midpoint on a five-point Likert-type scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1987;64(2):359–362. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.2.359.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the «laws» of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2010;15(5):625–632. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
Robbins NB, Heiberger RM. Plotting Likert and other rating scales. In: American Statistical Association. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods; 2011 July 30 – August 4; Miami Beach, USA. Washington: American Statistical Association; 2011. p. 1058–1066.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of a test. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555.
McDonald R. Structural models and the art of approximation. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2010;5(6):675–686. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610388766.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)