Actor-network theory as a methodology of modern social research

Authors

  • Daniela A. Mozalevskaya Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

actor-network theory, actor – network, concept of generalised symmetry, process of translation, concept of flat ontology

Abstract

The article presents an investigation of the actor-network theory (ANT) and its conceptual contribution to the understanding of changes in modern society. The key concepts and methodological principles of ANT are defined, such as generalised symmetry, flat ontology, demonstrating the complexity of the social world and a new hybrid understanding of reality. The characteristic features of ANT are revealed, including its emphasis on the inseparability of human and non-human factors in hybrid networks. The categorical apparatus of this program and the process of translation are considered. Critical remarks on the ANT are given and the heuristic potential of the theoretical approach in the context of interdisciplinary research is presented.

Author Biography

  • Daniela A. Mozalevskaya, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of philosophy and methodology of science, faculty of philosophy and social science

References

  1. Latour B. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte; 1991. 204 p. Russian edition: Latour B. Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Kalugina DYа, translator. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta; 2006. 240 p.
  2. Greimas AI, Courtes J. [Semiotics. Explanatory dictionary of language theory]. In: Stepanov YuS, editor. Semiotika [Semiotics]. Moscow: Raduga; 1983. p. 483–550. Russian.
  3. Latour B, Acrich M. A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In: Bijker WE, Law J, editors. Shaping technology / building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1992. p. 259–264.
  4. Sivokon’ AS. [Actor-network approach and perspectives in socio-philosophical discourse]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2015;157(1):162–169. Russian.
  5. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. 825 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815478.
  6. Erofeeva M. On the possibility of actor-network theory of action. Sociology of Power. 2015;27(4):51–71. Russian.
  7. Vakhshtayn VS. [The return of the material. «Spaces», «networks», «flows» in actor-network theory]. Russian Sociological Review. 2005;4(1):94–115. Russian.
  8. Latour B. Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Porter C, translator. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2004. 320 p.
  9. Latour B. On technical mediation. Common Knowledge. 1994:3(2):29–64.
  10. Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. 301 p. Russian edition: Latour B. Peresborka sotsial’nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Polonskaya I, translator; Gavrilenko S, editor. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki; 2014. 384 p.
  11. Callon M. [Some elements of the sociology of translation: the domestication of scallops and the fishermen of the Gulf of Saint-Brieuc]. Sociology of Power. Korbut A, translator. 2015;1:196–231. Russian.
  12. Callon M. The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan; 1986. p. 19–34. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_2.
  13. Broer T, Nieboer AP, Bal RA. Opening the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: an actor-network theory approach. BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10:1–9.
  14. Delanda M. Novaya filosofiya obshchestva. Teoriya assamblyazhei i sotsial’naya slozhnost’ [A new philosophy of society. assemblage theory and social complexity]. Mayorova K, translator. Perm: HylePress; 2018. 170 p. Russian.
  15. Bennett J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press; 2010. 200 p. DOI: 10.1215/9780822391623.
  16. Epp, AM, Price LL. The storied life of singularised objects: forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010;36(5):820–837. DOI: 10.1086/603547.
  17. Hoffman DL, Novak TP. Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM. 1999;42(4):80–85. DOI: 10.1145/299157.299175.
  18. Parviainen J, Coeckelbergh M. The political choreography of the Sophia robot: beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market. AI & Society. 2020;36:715–724. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01104-w.
  19. Yuldashev L. Kak izuchat’ istoriyu interneta? Metody, podhody, idei [How to study the history of the Internet? Methods, approaches, ideas]. Moscow: Litres; 2020. 178 p. Russian.
  20. Bearman M, Ajjawi R. Actor-network theory and the OSCE: formulating a new research agenda for a post-psychometric era. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice. 2018;23(1):1037–1049. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-017-9797-7.
  21. Nimmo R. Actor-network theory and methodology: social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations. 2011;6(3):108–19. DOI:10.4256/MIO.2011.010.
  22. Williams R, Edge D. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy. 1996;25:865–899. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2.
  23. Munir K, Jones M. Discontinuity and after: the social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance. Organization Studies. 2004;4:561–581. DOI: 10.1177/0170840604040676.
  24. Ingold T. Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2012;41:427–442. DOI: 10.1146/annurevanthro-081309-145920.
  25. Borgerson JL. The flickering consumer: new materialities and consumer research. Consumer Culture Theory. 2014; 15:125–144. DOI: 10.1108/S0885-2111(2013)0000015009.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-14

Issue

No. 3 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Section

Social Researches

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Mozalevskaya, D.A. 2022. Actor-network theory as a methodology of modern social research. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 3 (Sep. 2022), 67–75.