The theory of communicative action and the idea of a post-secular society by Habermas: critical interpretation in the Chinese version of neo-Marxism

Authors

  • Tang Yongbo Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

J. Habermas, communicative action, public sphere, deliberative democracy, secularisation, post-secular society, neo-Marxism, Chinese version of neo-Marxism

Abstract

The article explicates the fundamental tenets of Habermas’ theory of communicative action, emphasising its organic alignment with his ideas on the role of the political public sphere in the development of democratic foundations and institutions in Western societies. It notes that Habermas’ idea of a post-secular society may offer a promising way out of the impasses of radically secularised societies. The article explores the socially constructive, ideologically engaged, and utopian aspects of the ideas and concepts of communicative rationality, deliberative democracy, and post-secular society. It also examines the modernisation practices of contemporary China, its characteristic technologies of social governance, and the spiritual traditions of the interpenetration of secular and religious components in the cultural life.

Author Biography

  • Tang Yongbo, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of philosophy and methodology of science, faculty of philo­sophy and social sciences

References

  1. Habermas J. Post-metaphysical thinking. Cao Weidong, Fu Degen, translators. Nanjing: Yilin Press; 2001. 266 p. Chinese.
  2. Habermas J. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cao Weidong, translator. Nanjing: Yilin Press; 2011. 447 p. Chinese.
  3. Habermas J. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cao Weidong, Wang Xiaojue, Liu Beicheng, Song Weijie, translators. Shanghai: Xuelin Press; 1999. 354 p. Chinese.
  4. Tong Shijun. The critical theory of a post-secular society: Habermas and religion. Social Sciences. 2008;1:4–15. Chinese.
  5. Carson C. Science as instrumental reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg. Continental Philosophy Review. 2010;42:483–509. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-009-9124-y.
  6. Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Shachin SV, translator; Sklyadnev DV, editor. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2001. 377 p. Russian.
  7. Shachin SV. Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative rationality and its applications to certain psychological issues. Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2012;1(1):34–46. EDN: OYFMBX. Russian.
  8. Motroshilova NV. The last interview and a new book by Jürgen Habermas: «No one and nothing worth remembering should not be forgotten in a modern history of philosophy». Philoshophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economic. 2020;4(4):297–313. DOI: 10.17323/2587-8719-2020-4-297-313. Russian.
  9. Plotnikov NS. The power of argument and public relations: 70 years of Habermas. Logos. 1998;8(12):119–122. Russian.
  10. Estelle Ferrarese. Habermas: Testing the Political. Thesis Eleven. 2015;1:1–16.
  11. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Volume 2. McCarthy T, translator. Boston: Beacon Press; 1984. 457 p.
  12. Habermas J. Religion and publicity: between naturalism and religion. Philosophical essays. Skuratov MB, translator. Moscow: Ves’ mir; 2011. 336 p. Russian.
  13. Fu Qilin. On Supek’s interpretation of neo-Marxist psychology. Marxism and Reality. 2023;6:149–159. Chinese.
  14. Xie Yongkang. The paradigm shift and issues of critical theory. Rethinking the relationship between «post-metaphysical thinking» and «negative dialectics». Chinese Social Sciences. 2009;3:32–43. Chinese.
  15. He Chunzhen, Gu Shengran. The connotation, characteristics, and implementation path of Habermas’ post-secular society. Journal of Jiamusi University (Social Sciences Edition). 2018;5:23–25. Chinese.
  16. Yang Yingfa. The revival of Chinese culture and the enhancement of China’s discourse power. Beijing: People’s Publishing House; 2022. 304 p. Chinese.
  17. Jun Hongfei, Wang Sinan. On the Multiple Reality Issues in the Study of Eastern European neo-Marxist theory. Shandong Social Sciences. 2024;3:14–20. Chinese.
  18. Liu Shaojie. The academic contributions and theoretical limitations of Eastern European neo-Marxist sociology. Learning and Exploration. 2024;1:123–128. Chinese.
  19. Li Jifeng. Seeking the moral foundations of politics. The theoretical appeal of Eastern European neo-Marxism. Social Scientist. 2023;10:24–29. Chinese.
  20. Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Collected essays on Yugoslav philosophy. Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore Press; 1979. 448 p. Chinese.
  21. Liu Haoyu, Sun Shaoyong. A theoretical logical analysis of Habermas’ technological ideology. Journal of Nanning Normal University (Social Science Edition). 2019;9:61–66. Chinese.
  22. He Cuixiang. On Habermas’ religious perspective in a post-secular society. Academic Exchange. 2017;9:83–89. Chinese.
  23. Zhang Rongnan. Habermas and Taylor on the religious issue in a post-secular society. Marxism and Reality. 2016;5:151–157. Chinese.
  24. Habermas J. Between naturalism and religion. Yu Zhejun, translator. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House; 2013. 303 p. Chinese.
  25. Strydom P. Intersubjectivity – interactionist or discursive? Reflections on Habermas’ critique of Brandom. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2006;32(2):155–172. DOI: 10.1177/0191453706061090.
  26. Habermas J. Between facts and norms. Tong Shijun, translator. Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore Press; 2003. 787 p. Chinese.
  27. Agger B. An introduction to Western Marxism. Shen Zhi, Liang Shufa, translators. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press; 1991. 522 p. Chinese.
  28. Habermas J. Toward a rational society: student protest, science and politics. Shapiro JJ, translator. Boston: Beacon Press; 1970. 132 p.
  29. Morganti F, Carassa A, Geminiani G. Planning optimal paths: a simple assessment of survey spatial knowledge in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior. 2006;23(4):1982–1996. DOI: 10.1016/J.CHB.2006.02.006.
  30. Tie Shenglin. The religious implications of Habermas’ public sphere. An interpretation from a hermeneutic perspective. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). 2008;1:42–46. Chinese.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

Issue

No. 1 (2026): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Section

Social Philosophy

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Yongbo, T. 2026. The theory of communicative action and the idea of a post-secular society by Habermas: critical interpretation in the Chinese version of neo-Marxism. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 1 (Jun. 2026), 26–38.