Constructivist interpretation of society in western sociology

Authors

  • Iryna V. Lashuk Belarusian State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

Keywords:

constructivism, phenomenology, ethnomethodology, socio-analysis, culture

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the main stages of the formation of a constructivist methodology in sociology. The indicated discourse consisted of differences in the conceptualization of the phenomenon of «society» and the characteristics of its (society) cognition. The main concepts of constructivist interpretation of the «society» phenomenon are considered. The origins of these ideas were formed in the framework of phenomenological philosophy, sociology, ethnomethodology. These theories laid the foundation for social constructivism in the person of P. Berger and T. Lukman, who proclaimed the basic principle of sociological knowledge: «Society exists in both objective and subjective reality». The focus of attention is further focused on the socio-analysis of P. Bourdieu, who seeks to dissociate himself from the structuralist and phenomenological approaches to the study of social reality and introduces the concept of «agent» as opposed to subject and individual.

Author Biography

  • Iryna V. Lashuk, Belarusian State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

    PhD (sociology), docent; associate professor at the department of economic sociology, head of the Center for social and humanitarian studies, Institute of social science and humanities education

References

  1. Gusserl E. [Phenomenology (article in the British Encyclopedia)]. Molchanova VI, translator. Logos. 1991;1:12–21. Russian.
  2. Shutz A. Izbrannoe. Mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Selected works. World, luminous sense] [Internet]. Moscow: ROSSPEN; 2004 [cited 2018 August 2]. Available from: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Sociolog/shyuz/index.php.Russian.
  3. Garfinkel G. [What is ethnomethodology?]. Korbut A, translator. Sociological review. 2003;3(4):3–25. Russian.
  4. Giddens E. Uskol’zayushchii mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn’ [Creeping world. How globalization is zeshaping our lives]. Мoscow: Ves’ mir; 2004. 120 p. Russian.
  5. Bek Y. Obshchestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu [Risk society: towards another modernity]. Sedel’nik V, Fedorova N, translators. Мoscow: Progress – Traditsiya; 2000. 383 p. Russian.
  6. Berger P, Lukman T. Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [Social construction of reality. Treatise on the sociology of knowledge]. Мoscow: Medium; 1995. 323 p. Russian.
  7. Djeymison F. [Postmodernism and the consumer society]. Penzin A, translator. Logos. 2000;4:63–77. Russian.
  8. Bourdie P. Nachala [Beginnings]. Shmatko NA, translator. Мoscow: Socio-Logos; 1994. 288 p. Russian.
  9. Bourdie P. [Physical and social spaces]. In: Bourdie P. Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Sociologia socialnogo prostranstva]. Shmatko NA, translator. Мoscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; 2007. 288 p. Co-publised by the «Aleteiya». Russian.
  10. Baudrillard G. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktury [Consumer society. His myths and structures]. Мoscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya; 2006. 272 p. Co-publised by the «Respublika». Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-21

Issue

Section

From the Working Table of a Sociologist

How to Cite

[1]
Lashuk, I.V. 2019. Constructivist interpretation of society in western sociology. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2 (Jul. 2019), 124–129.