Generation of Z: split of traditions or code conversion of culture
Keywords:
the generation of Z, a total anomy, total demoralization, intra generational split, traditional standard and valuable model, sensitivity of tools meant and meaning meanings, a culture codeAbstract
In the center of research attention – modern generation of students. Actual tendencies in the student’s environment are considered and the hypothesis of split in generation of Z and alienation of its solid part from traditional standard valuable model is made. In parallel it is about metodiko-procedural problems of modern sociology and strengthening of its sensitivity to measurement of sense which are put by modern youth in the interpretation of basic values.
References
- Shamis E. V kakikh usloviyakh rastet pokolenie milenium i Z i chto stanet ikh tsennostyami. Teoriya pokolenii v Rossii. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki Pokolenie_Z (date of access: 05.03.2017) (in Russ.).
- Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E. Molodezh’ Rossii: sotsiologicheskii portret. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2010 (in Russ.).
- Nikol’skii S. A. Gorizonty smyslov. Filosofskie interpretatsii otechestvennoi literatury XIX–XX vekov. Moscow, 2015 (in Russ.).
- Shyutts A. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoi sotsiologii. Moscow, 2003 (in Russ.).
- Aleksander Dzh. Smysly sotsial’noi zhizni: kul’tursotsiologiya. Moscow, 2013 (in Russ.).
- Toshchenko Zh. T. Sotsiologiya zhizni. Moscow, 2016 (in Russ.).
- Zafirovsky M. Beneath rational choice. Elements of irrational choice theory. Sotsiologicheskie issled. 2014. No. 3. P. 19–28 (in Russ.).
- Novikova L. G. Religioznost’ v Belarusi na rubezhe vekov: tendentsii I osobennosti proyavleniya: sotsiologicheskii aspekt. Minsk, 2001 (in Russ.).
- Inglkhart R., Vel’tsel’ K. Modernizatsiya, kul’turnye tsennosti i demokratiya: Posledovatel’nost’ chelovecheskogo razvitiya. Moscow, 2011 (in Russ.).
- Golovakha E. The phenomenon of «amoral majority» in the Post-soviet society: transformation of mass beliefs about social behaviour norms in Ukraine. Monit. obshchestvennogo mnenija: jekon. i social’nye peremeny. 2002. No. 6 (62). P. 20–22 (in Russ.).
- Gusserl’ E. Kartezinskie razmyshleniya. Moscow, 2001 (in Russ.).
- Muradyan E. S., Sal'nikova S. A., Titarenko L. G., et al. Dinamika tsennostno-normativnoi sistemy i zhiznennye shansy: opyt postsovetskoi transformatsii v Pogranich’e. Vil’nyus, 2014 (in Russ.).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)