New and old authoritarianism in a comparative perspective

Authors

  • Jerzy Vyatr The European Higher School of Law and Management, 21/29 Grodzieńska Street, Warsaw 03-750, Poland; University of Warsaw, 26/28 Krakowskie Przedmiescie Avenue, Warsaw 00-927, Poland

Keywords:

authoritarianism, democracy, election, leadership, parties, rule of law

Abstract

The third wave of democratization, unlike the first and the second, has not been followed by the reverse wave. However, in several countries (Russia, Belarus, Turkey, Hungary, Poland) democratically elected leaders interpret democracy narrowly, as the rule of majority only. Other conditions for democratic government (the rule of law, protecting human rights) are ignored. Such system of government differs from the authoritarian model (as defined by Juan J. Linz), and can best be called «new authoritarianism». Poland is a special case because, while after the presidential and parliamentary elections of 2015 authoritarian practices became common, the hold on power by the ruling party («Law and Justice») is relatively weak. Future development of Polish politics depends mostly on the next parliamentary (2019) and presidential (2020) elections.

Author Biography

  • Jerzy Vyatr, The European Higher School of Law and Management, 21/29 Grodzieńska Street, Warsaw 03-750, Poland; University of Warsaw, 26/28 Krakowskie Przedmiescie Avenue, Warsaw 00-927, Poland

    doctor of sociology, honorary rector, The European Higher School of Law and Management; honorary professor, University of Warsaw

References

  1. Przeworski A. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.
  2. Bresser Pereira C. L., Maravall J. M., Przeworski A. Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
  3. Przeworski A. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995.
  4. Jahn E., Wildenmann R. Stability in East Central Europe? Stabilitat in Ostmitteleuropa? Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993.
  5. Wiatr J. J. Democracy versus a New Authoritarianism in Eastern Europe. In: R. Kilminster, I. Varcoe (eds). Culture, Modernity and Revolution: Essays in Honour of Zygmunt Bauman. London ; New York : Routledge, 1996. P. 201–214.
  6. Kubiak H. Democracy and the Individual «Will» in Democracy: Its Principles and Achievements. Geneva : The Inter-Parliamentary Union, 1998.
  7. Shoup P. Comparing Communist Nations: Prospects for an Empirical Approach. In: K. Roger (ed.). The Behavioral Revolution and Communist Studies. New York : The Free Press, 1971. P. 15–47.
  8. Anyang’ Nyong’o. When Elections Fail Twice or More, Can ‘Losers’ Accept the ‘Victors’ as Legitimate? Participation. 2016. Vol. 40, No. 1. P. 18–20.
  9. Friedrich C. J., Brzezinski Z. K. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge : Harvard Univ. Press, 1956.
  10. Linz J. J. An Authoritarian regime: Spain. In: E. Allardt, Y. Littunen (eds). Cleavages, Ideologies and Party Systems: Contributions to Comparative Political Sociology. Helsinki : The Acad. Bookstore, 1964. P. 291–341.
  11. Linz J. J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder : Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000.
  12. O’Donnell G. Delegative Democracy? J. Democr. 1994. Vol. 5, No. 1. P. 60–62.
  13. Zakaria F. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York : W. W. Norton, 2007.
  14. Maravall J. M., Przeworski A. (eds). Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
  15. Shlapentoskh V. Russian Civil Society: Elite Versus Mass Attitudes in the Democratization of Russia. In: J. V. Ciprut (ed.). Democratizations: Comparisons, Confrontations, and Contrasts. Cambridge ; London : The MIT Press, 2008. P. 165–196.
  16. Shestopal E. New Trends in Russian Political Mentality. Lanham : Lexington Books, 2006.
  17. Wiatr Jerzy J. Democratizations in Central Europe: Comparative Perspectives. In: J. V. Ciprut (ed.). Democratizations: Comparisons, Confrontations, and Contrasts. Cambridge ; London : The MIT Press, 2008. P. 145–164.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12

Issue

No. 4 (2017): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

Articles and Reports

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Vyatr, J. 2019. New and old authoritarianism in a comparative perspective. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Mar. 2019), 26–33.