Necessity entrepreneurship: problems and ways to overcome them

Authors

  • Tatyana V. Kuzmenko Institute of Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

Keywords:

entrepreneurship, small business, necessity entrepreneurship, voluntary entrepreneurship, business activity, institutional environment, motivation of entrepreneurial activity, adaptation

Abstract

The factors that influence the motivation of entrepreneurial activity are analyzed in the article. On the materials of empirical research, the features of necessity entrepreneurship and the associated social risks and ways to overcome them are considered. The contradictions between the relative ease of opening and registering a business and the lack of tools and skills for carrying out further economic activities for necessity entrepreneurs are revealed. The idea that the forced nature of entrepreneurial activity can’t serve as an incentive for innovative transformations, and the transformation of entrepreneurship into a factor of economic growth requires conditions that contribute not only to increasing the number of small enterprises, but also to their effective development is justified. As the most important directions for the development of entrepreneurship, it is proposed to stimulate voluntary entrepreneurship, to reorient support tools from financial to training, to create an effective system of business education.

Author Biography

  • Tatyana V. Kuzmenko, Institute of Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    PhD (sociology); leading researcher

References

  1. State Program on Social Protection and Employment Promotion for 2016–2020 [cited 2018 March 3]. Available from: http://mintrud.gov.by/system/extensions/spaw/uploads/files/Gosudarstvennaja-programma-na-2016-2020.pdf. Russian.
  2. Dawson C, Henley A. «Push» versus «pull» entrepreneurship: an ambiguous distinction? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 2012;18(6):697–719. DOI: 10.1108/1355255121126819.
  3. Chepurenko AY. [Early Entrepreneurship in Russia: Intermediate Results of GEM]. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2008;2:22–40. Russian.
  4. Verkhovskaya OR, Aleksandrova EA, Bogatyreva KA, Dzhelepova MV, Shmeleva EV. [Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Russia 2016–2017] [national report]. Saint Petersburg: VShM SPbGU; 2017. 66 p. [cited 2018 April 8]. Available from: http://gsom.spbu.ru/files/docs/gem_russia_2016–2017.pdf. Russian.
  5. Jurgenson A. [Forced entrepreneurship in Estonia: prevalence, problems and entrepreneurs’ satisfaction]. Praxis. 2010;2 [cited 2018 April 6]. Available from: http://www.praxis.ee/fileadmin/tarmo/Projektid/Valitsemine_ja_kodanike%C3%BChiskond/VUEFvene_veebi/Vajadusettevotlus_Poliitikaanalueues_RU.pdf. Russian.
  6. Radaev VV. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic sociology]. Moscow: Aspect Press; 1998. 368 p. Russian.
  7. Alexandrova EA, Verkhovskaya ОR. Motivation of entrepreneurial activity: the role of the institutional environment. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 8, Menedzhment [Vestnik of the Saint Petersburg State University. Series 8, Management]. 2016;3:107–138. Russian.
  8. Vasilyonok VL, Aleksashkina EI. Development of business and its factors defining. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment» [Scientific journal of NIIT ITMO. Series «Economics and environmental management»]. 2013;1 [cited 2018 October 2]. Available from: http://economics.itmo.info/ru/article/6983/razvitie_predprinimatelstva_i_faktory_ego_opredelyayuschie.htm. Russian.
  9. Pinskovetskaya YS, Kataev EN. Comparative analysis of entrepreneurial activity in economically developed countries. Saint Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2014;4:172–182. Russian.
  10. Sechko NN. [Orientation of the youth of Belarus for engaging in entrepreneurial activity]. Nauchnye trudy Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Scientific works of the Belarusian State Economic University]. Minsk: BSEU; 2017. Issue 10. p. 641–647. Russian.
  11. Realization of active measures of employment policy [cited 2018 March 3]. Available from: http://www.mintrud.gov.by/system/extensions/spaw/uploads/files/Realizatsija-aktivnyx-mer-12.pdf. Russian.
  12. Verkhovskaya OR, Dorokhina MV. Activity and potential of the Russian entrepreneurship (evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, 2006–2010). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya «Menedzhment» [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University. Series 8, Management]. 2011;4:68–99. Russian.
  13. Smirnova RA. [Socio-class structure of the Belarusian society: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Sotsiologicheskii al’manakh [Sociological almanac]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2017. p. 365–373. Russian.
  14. The state of small and medium-sized private business in Belarus in 2018. Survey results. Analytical review [cited 2018 May 2]. Available from: http://www.research.by/webroot/delivery/files/sr2018r02.pdf. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-18

Issue

Section

From the Working Table of a Sociologist

How to Cite

[1]
Kuzmenko, T.V. 2019. Necessity entrepreneurship: problems and ways to overcome them. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 3 (Mar. 2019), 110–117.