Historical tradition of foreign policy strategy of the United States of America as a condition for global imbalance

Authors

  • Ivan I. Antonovich Institution of Socio-Political Researches, Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Fotievoi Street, 1 building, Moscow 119333, Russia

Keywords:

current crisis, Panatlantic community, geopolitical strategy, wilsonianism, world order, national security

Abstract

Contemporary crisis of the Panatlantic community is explained by the Western leaders and the mass media by unilateral actions of the President Trump. On the basis of the research of the geopolitical strategy of the United States of America in the XX–XXI centuries we come to the conclusion that basically US foreign policy and strategy during this period is characterized by a certain constancy. It is guided by President Wilson’s formula to make the world safe for democracy and his basic geostrategic conclusion that US national interest is basically adequate to the goals and interests of the international community. This approach to the world has been called wilsonianism and has guided the international behavior of the american elites of power and influence for the length of the historical period after the First World War up to the present time. President Trump relies on this strategy under conditions of the economic weakening and military defeats of the United States. This compels him to use political pressure, open humbug and military aggression. President Trump declares the enemies of the United States other countries who challenge US supremacy, mostly China and Russia. This strategy is a constant source of the volatility of the world order.

Author Biography

  • Ivan I. Antonovich, Institution of Socio-Political Researches, Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Fotievoi Street, 1 building, Moscow 119333, Russia

    doctor of science (philosophy), full professor; principal researcher

References

  1. King S. Zapad teryaet kontrol’. Tri modeli finansovogo budushchego mira [Losing control. The Emerging threats to Western prosperity]. Moscow: Kar’era Press; 2015. Russian.
  2. Die Neue Welt Ordnung. Der Spiegel. 2018;25. German.
  3. Wilson W. The Idea of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers; 1917.
  4. Wilson W. The State: the Elements of Historical and Practical Policies. Boston, New York, Chicago: D. C. Heath & Co; 1918.
  5. Smith T. Why Wilson Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2017.
  6. Ikenberry J, Slaughter A-M. Forging a World of Liberty under Law. Princeton: The Princeton Project Papers; 2006.
  7. The National Security Strategy for the United States of America [Internet]. 2002 November [cited 2018 June 21]. Available from: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf.
  8. Giles K, Hanson Ph, Lyne R, Nixey J, Sherr J, Wood A. The Russian Challenge. Chatham House. Report. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs; 2015.
  9. Trenin D. Russia and Europe: what to strive for and what to do? Tsentr Karnegi [Internet]. 2018 March 29 [cited 2018 June 21]. Available from: https://carnegie.ru/2018/03/29/ru-pub-75938. Russian.
  10. Fridman J. [After 2020 Russia will disintegrate]. Polska Times. 2018 June 15. Russian.
  11. Gosset D. From Chinese «Renessanse» to Community of shared Destiny. Global Times. China Daily. 2018 June 23–24.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

How to Cite

[1]
Antonovich, I.I. 2019. Historical tradition of foreign policy strategy of the United States of America as a condition for global imbalance. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Mar. 2019), 39–47.