Morality as a complex self-developing system

Authors

  • Elena V. Belyaeva Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

systems approach, systemic-synergetic approach, system of morality, the dynamics of morality

Abstract

Interpretation of morality as a complex self-developing system contains fruitful possibilities for ethical research, allows to build a pluralistic and at the same time holistic picture of the dynamics of morality. The unity of morality as a system is determined by the peculiarities of its normative-value structure and specific function. Solving the problem of the diversity of morality is possible due to the use of the systemic-synergetic principle of nonlinearity. It allows to justify the spontaneous formation of a number of self-sufficient systems of morality that fulfill universal functions; interpret the process of determining morality as polydetermination and self-determination; еxplain the relationship of the universal and historically concrete in morality; to implement a scenario approach in determining trends in the development of modern morality. As a result, the dynamics of morality is represented as a process of self-organization of individual and collective subjects of morality that need for community stabilization and the assertion of the self-worth of an individual through the development of normative-value structures.

Author Biography

  • Elena V. Belyaeva, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

References

  1. Alekseev IS. [Methods for studying system objects in classical mechanics]. In: Systems research. Yearbook. 1972. Мoscow: Nauka; 1972. p. 72–89. Russian.
  2. Haken H. Sinergetika [Synergetics]. Moscow: Mir; 1980. 404 p. Russian.
  3. Prigogine I, Stangers I. Vremya, khaos, kvant: k resheniyu paradoksa vremeni [Time, chaos, quantum: to the solution of the paradox of time]. Moscow: Progress; 1994. 266 p. Russian.
  4. Stepin VS. Self-developing systems and philosophy [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2011 January 14]. Available from: http://spkurdyumov.narod.ru/stepin444.htm. Russian.
  5. Budanov VG. [On the methodology of synergetics]. Voprosy filosofii. 2006;5:79–94. Russian.
  6. Knyazeva EN, Kurdyumov SP. Zakony evolyutsii i samoorganizatsii slozhnykh sistem [Laws of evolution and self-organization of complex systems]. Мoscow: Nauka; 1994. 236 p. Russian.
  7. Stepin VS. [Classics, non-classical, post-non-classical: discrimination criteria]. In: Kiyashchenko LP, Stepin VS, editors. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-classics: philosophy, science, culture]. Saint Petersburg: Mir; 2009. p. 249–295. Russian.
  8. Hegel GVF. [The system of morality]. In: Hegel GVF. Politicheskie proizvedeniya [Political works]. Мoscow: Nauka; 1978. p. 276–367. Russian.
  9. Kon IS, editor. Slovar’ po etike [Dictionary of ethics]. Мoscow: Politizdat; 1981. 431 p. Russian.
  10. Vasilkova VV. Poryadok i khaos v razvitii sotsial’nykh sistem: sinergetika i teoriya sotsial’noi samoorganizatsii [Order and chaos in the development of social systems: synergetics and the theory of social self-organization]. Saint Petersburg: Lan’; 1999. 478 p. Russian.
  11. Becker V. [Religion and morals]. In: Porus VN, editor. Religiya. Magiya. Mif: sovremennye filosofskie issledovaniya. Sbornik dokladov II Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma; 10–14 aprelya 1997 g.; Aikhshtet, FRG [Religion. Magic. Myth: modern philosophical studies. Collection of reports II International Simpozium; 1997 April 10–14; Aichstet, FRG]. Moscow: URSS; 1997. p. 81–99. Russian.
  12. Halman L, Hagenaas J, Moorse G. Map of European cultures. A research of main value orientations shared by European countries population. In: Bulynko DM, Danilov AN, Rotman DG, editors. Tsennostnyi mir sovremennogo cheloveka. Belarus’ v proekte «Issledovanie evropeiskikh tsennostei» [The value world of modern man: Belarus in the project «The study of European values»]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. p. 35–52. Russian.
  13. Mojeiko MA. Stanovlenie teorii nelineinykh dinamik v sovremennoi kul’ture: sravnitel’nyi analiz sinergeticheskoi i postmodernistskoi paradigm [Formation of the theory of nonlinear dynamics in modern culture: a comparative analysis of synergetic and postmodern paradigms]. Minsk: Belarusian State Economic University; 1999. 294 p. Russian.
  14. Bakshtanovsky VI, Sogomonov YuV. [Historical types of evolution of normative-value systems]. In: Bakshtanovsky VI, Sogomonov YuV. Prikladnaya etika: opyt universitetskogo slovarya [Applied ethics: the experience of the university dictionary]. Tyumen: Research Institute for Applied Edhies, Tyumen Industrial Universtity; 2001. p. 48–86. Russian.
  15. Branskii VP. [Theoretical foundations of social synergetics]. Voprosy filosofii. 2000;4:112–129. Russian.
  16. Laptenok AS. Moral’noe nasledie v sotsiodinamike kul’tury [Moral heritage in the socio-dynamics of culture]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2002. 125 p. Russian.
  17. Afanasyeva VV. Determinirovannyi khaos: ot fiziki k filosofii [Deterministic chaos: from physics to philosophy]. Saratov: Saratov State University Publishing House; 2001. 216 p. Russian.
  18. Rashkovsky EB. [History of Russia – through the prism of postmodern]. In: Khoros VG, Krasil’shchikov VA, editors. Postindustrial’nyi mir i Rossiya [Postindustrial world and Russia]. Мoscow: Editorial URSS; 2001. p. 571–586. Russian.
  19. Nazaretyan AP. Antropologiya nasiliya i kul’tura samoorganizatsii: ocherki po evolyutsionno-istoricheskoi psikhologii [Anthropology of violence and the culture of self-organization: essays on evolutionary historical psychology]. Мoscow: URSS; 2007. 256 p. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-19

How to Cite

[1]
Belyaeva, E.V. 2019. Morality as a complex self-developing system. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Mar. 2019), 57–64.