Personal data state monopoly loosing as a national security risk

Authors

  • Aleksandr G. Klimashin Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

Keywords:

personal data, personal secret, monopoly, personal protection, information security of citizens, hosting, provider, application developers, sense of safety

Abstract

It is obvious that in recent decades, the state structures of the vast majority of countries are headily losing the monopoly on citizens’ personal data. In the author’s view, this also poses a threat to the individual and to national security in general. The problem is caused by the fact that the development of Internet technologies increases the number of different service companies that provide information services: access to information data banks, Internet connection, applications for mobile devices and so on. When providing such services, most companies collect personal data and the need for such measures is not always obvious. However, we have come to a situation where many third-party companies have already collected a significant amount of information about citizens, the control of which is extremely difficult.

Author Biography

  • Aleksandr G. Klimashin, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of the state service sociology

References

  1. Babash AV, Baranova EK, Larin DA. Informatsionnaya bezopasnost’. Istoriya zashchity informatsii v Rossii [Information security. History of information security in Russia]. Moscow: KDU; 2013. 736 p. Russian.
  2. Klimashin AG. [Increasing risks of personal information security in social networks]. In: Informatsionnaya revolyutsiya i vyzovy novoi epokhi – stimuly formirovaniya sovremennykh podkhodov k informatsionnoi bezopasnosti. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 29–30 noyabrya 2018 g.; Minsk, Belarus’. Tom 1 [Information revolution and challenges of a new era – incentives for the formation of modern approaches in information security. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference; 2018 November 29–30; Minsk, Belarus. Volume 1]. Minsk: National Security Institute of the Republic of Belarus; 2019. p. 173–177. Russian.
  3. Babosov EM. Provision of information security as a factor for sustainable development of Belarus. Vesnik of Brest University. Series 1. Philosophy. Politology. Sociology. 2012;2:133–141. Russian.
  4. Bobkova VA. [Information security and its components]. 2015 March 12 [cited 2019 April 29]. Available from: https://studfiles.net/preview/2012615/. Russian.
  5. Bezkorovainy MM, Tatuzov AL. Cybersecurity approaches to the definition. Cybersecurity issues. 2014;1:22–27. Russian.
  6. Klimashin AG. Individual information security in digital era. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Humanitarian Series. 2019;64(2):145–150. DOI: 10.29235/2524-2369-2019-64-2-145-150. Russian.
  7. Klimashin AG. Network terrorist communities. In: Yaskevich YaS, Tereshchenko OV, Gafarova YuYu, editors. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii v sovremennom mire. Sbornik nauchnykh statei po materialam raboty Pervogo belorusskogo filosofskogo kongressa; 18–20 oktyabrya 2017 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Social communications in the modern world: collected articles on materials of work of the First Belarusian Congress of Philosophy; 2017 October 18–20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2018. p. 387–392. Russian.
  8. [Research Telegram audience] [Internet]. 2018 January 16 [cited 2019 May 29]. Available from: http://momri.org/2018/momrinews/issledovanie-telegram-auditorii/.
  9. [Compiled Top 5 most popular social networks and instant messengers in Belarus] [Internet]. 2018 October 31 [cited 2019 March 11]. Available from: https://thinktanks.by/publication/2018/10/31/sostavlen-top-5-samyh-populyarnyh-sotssetey-i-messendzherov-v-belarusi.html.
  10. Cardozo N, Gebhart G, Portnoy E, editors. Secure Messaging Scorecard: a Study of the Electronic Frontier Foundation [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 March 11]. Available from: https://www.eff.org/node/82654.
  11. About operatively-search activity: Law of the Republic of Belarus from 15 July 2015 No. 307-3. National center of the legal information of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk; 2019. Russian.
  12. Blinov YuS, Vagin OA, Vandyshev AS, Volod’ko NP, Goryainov KK, Grib VG, et al. Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel’nost’ [Operatively-search activity]. Goryainov KK, Ovchinskii VS, Sinilova GK, Shumilov AYu, editors. 2th edition, supplemented and revised. Moscow: Infra-M; 2004. 848 p. Russian.
  13. Sukhareva O. [Direct marketing: law on personal data radically changed the legal status of information about the consumer]. Arsenal predprinimatelya. 2010;2:18–24. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-02

Issue

Section

From the Working Table of a Sociologist

How to Cite

[1]
Klimashin, A.G. 2019. Personal data state monopoly loosing as a national security risk. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 3 (Oct. 2019), 107–112.