The phenomena of modern motherhood as a moral value: sociological aspect

Authors

  • Katsiaryna H. Paulava Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

archetype of mother, mother’s image, mother’s self-awarenes, parent’s settings, valuable characteristics of motherhood

Abstract

The article consist a sociological review of the phenomena of modern motherhood as a moral value. The problem field for complex study of motherhood as a moral value is presented. Sociological indicators for empiric study are highlighted. Among them are: valuable characteristics of motherhood; the structure of mother’s self-awareness; mother’s representations about child; the role of mother’s image in child’s development; child’s attachment to mother. Feminist tradition levels motherhood as a self-value. Feminist tradition treats motherhood as a biological function, which interferes social, economic and politic functions of women. Contrary to feminist tradition, modern turbulent society is complicated for men. A woman is facing a new challenge, her role is to continue a man-kind, according to archetype of mother. This thesis should be transmited as a socialization model of young generation.

Author Biography

  • Katsiaryna H. Paulava, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (sociology), docent; associate professor at the department of sociology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Tronina LN. Etiko-psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo materinstva [Ethic and phsycological problems of modern motherhood] [abstract of dissertation]. Tula: Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University; 2010. 21 p. Russian.
  2. Barkova LA. Fenomen materinstva kak dukhovnaya tsennost’ sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva [The motherhood phenomena as a spirit value of modern Russian society] [dissertation abstract]. Moscow: Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation; 2008. 25 p. Russian.
  3. Rybakova EN. Strukturnaya organizatsiya samosoznaniya materi [The structural organization of mother’s self-awareness] [abstract of dissertation]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University; 2007. 23 p. Russian.
  4. Petrova AA. Materinskie predstavleniya o individualno-psikhologicheskikh osobennostyakh rebenka kak faktor detsko-roditel’skogo emotsional’nogo vzaimodeistviya [Mother’s settings on individual and physiologic peculiarities of child as a factor of parents-child emotional interaction] [dissertation abstract]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2008. 24 p. Russian.
  5. Cyrkin VA. Obraz fizicheskogo «Ya» u lits s raznymi tipami emotsionalnoi privyazannosti k materi [The image of physical self of people with different types of emotional connection with mother] [abstract of dissertation]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky; 2015. 22 p. Russian.
  6. Vasilyeva II. Arkhetip materinstva v drevne-yazycheskih i khristianskikh kul’turakh i religiyakh [The archetype of mother in antient and christian culture and religion] [dissertation abstract]. Moscow: Akademiya perepodgotovki rabotnikov iskusstva, kul’tury i turizma; 2007. 24 p. Russian.
  7. Almond B. The monster within: the hidden side of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010. 266 p.
  8. Bailey L. Gender shows: first-time mothers and embodied selves. Gender and Society. 2001;15(1):110–129. DOI: 10.1177/089124301015001006.
  9. Barlett A. Thinking through breasts: writing maternity. Feminist Theory. 2000;1(2):173–188. DOI: 10.1177/14647000022229146.
  10. Craig L. Contemporary motherhood. The impact of children on adult time. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.; 2007. 187 p.
  11. Christopher K. Extensive mothering. Employed mother’s construction of the good mother. Gender and Society. 2012;26(1):73–96. DOI: 10.1177/0891243211427700.
  12. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991. 256 p.
  13. Hays S. The cultural contradiction of motherhood. New Haven and London: Yale University Press; 1996. 255 p.
  14. Hennum N. Young people and motherhood: culture and conduct. Young. 1999;7(4):38–51. DOI: 10.1177/110330889900700403.
  15. Kawash S. New direction in motherhood studies. Signs. 2011;36(4):969–1003. DOI: 10.1086/658637.
  16. Kielty S. Working hard to resist a «bad mother» label: narratives of non-resident motherhood. Qualitative social work. 2008;7(3):363–379. DOI: 10.1177/1473325008093707.
  17. Pugh AJ. Selling compromise: toys, motherhood, and cultural deal. Gender and Society. 2005;19(6):729–749. DOI: 10.1177/0891243205279286.
  18. Sevon E. Timing motherhood: experiencing and narrating the choice to become a mother. Feminist and Psychology. 2005;15(4):461–482. DOI: 10.1177/0959-353505057619.
  19. Walter M. Working their way out of poverty? Sole motherhood, work, welfare and material well-being. Journal of Sociology. 2002;38(4):361–380. DOI: 10.1177/144078302128756732.
  20. Woodward K. Motherhood: identities, meanings and myths. In: Woodward K, editor. Identity and Difference. London: Sage; 1997. p. 239–298.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-03

How to Cite

[1]
Paulava, K.H. 2020. The phenomena of modern motherhood as a moral value: sociological aspect. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Jan. 2020), 80–85.