The Eurasianism concept: Russian vs Western perspectives

Authors

  • Jiří Šubrt Charles University, 8 U. Kříže Street, Prague 158 00, Czechia
  • Irina Šulc Charles University, 8 U. Kříže Street, Prague 158 00, Czechia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5164-3917

Keywords:

Eurasianism, fascism, ideocracy, P. Savitskii, L. Gumilev, A. Dugin, C. Hann

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the concept of Eurasianism in the context of two approaches: Russian and Western. It will focus on how the idea of Eurasia has evolved over time first among Russian emigrants in Czechoslovakia, France and the USA in the period between the two world wars (P. Savitskii, N. Trubetskoy, G. Vernadsky), later – from the late 20th century in the USSR and in Russia itself (L. Gumilev, A. Dugin), and finally today, in the framework of Western social sciences (K. Hann). The aim of this paper is to give an indication of how this concept has served at different times and how its content has changed depending on the personality of the researcher and his worldview. The novelty of the approach is in contrasting the Russian and Western concepts of Eurasianism. The Russian perspectives speak of Eurasia within the framework of the Russian Empire or within the framework of the Soviet Union. The Western perspective is much wider than the Russian one and covers Europe and Asia. It was formed in the context of socio-anthropological research as an attempt to explain the processes taking place in post-communist countries, but it was also criticised. The fundamental question concerns its professional status – is it merely an ideological construction or does it have scientific substance?

Author Biographies

  • Jiří Šubrt, Charles University, 8 U. Kříže Street, Prague 158 00, Czechia

    doctor of philosophy, docent; head of the department of historical sociology, faculty of humanities

  • Irina Šulc, Charles University, 8 U. Kříže Street, Prague 158 00, Czechia

    postgraduate student at the department of historical sociology, faculty of humanities

References

  1. Alekseev NN. Na putyakh k budushchei Rossii: (Sovetskii stroi i ego politicheskie vozmozhnosti) [On the way to future Russia: (Soviet system and its political capabilities)]. Paris: Evrazijskoe knigoizdatel’stvo; 1927. 80 p. Russian.
  2. Savitskii PN, Suvchinskii PP, Trubetskoy NS, Florovsii GV. Iskhod k Vostoku. Predchuvstviya i sversheniya. Utverzhdenie evraziitsev [Exodus to the East. Premonitions and accomplishments. The affirmation of the Eurasians]. Sofia: [s. n.]; 1921. 125 p. Russian.
  3. Trubetskoy NS. Evropa i Chelovechestvo [Europe and Humanity]. Sofia: [s. n.]; 1920. 113 p. Russian.
  4. Savitskii PN. [Europe and Eurasia (regarding the brochure of N. S. Trubetskoy «Europe and Humanity»)]. Russkaya mysl’. 1920;1–2:120–138. Russian.
  5. Alekseev NN. Kuda idti? K voprosu o novoi sovetskoi Konstitutsii [Where to go? To the question of the new Soviet Constitution]. Berlin: [s. n.]; 1936. 98 p. Russian.
  6. Trubetskoy NS. O gosudarstvennom stroe i forme pravleniya. Istoriya. Kul’tura. Yazyk [On the state system and form of government. History. Culture. Language]. Moscow: Progress; 1995. 799 p. Russian.
  7. Glebov S. Evraziistvo mezhdu imperiei i modernom. Istoriya v dokumentakh [Eurasianism between the empire and modernity. A history in documents]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo; 2010. 632 p. Russian.
  8. Savický I. Osudová setkání. Češi v Rusku a Rusové v Čechách 1914–1938. Prague: Academia; 1999. 464 p.
  9. Savitskii PN. Kontinent – okean (Rossiya i mirovoi rynok). Kontinent Evraziya [Continent – ocean (Russia and the world market). Continent Eurasia]. Moscow: Agraf; 1997. 464 p. Russian.
  10. Isaev IA, editor. Evraziistvo. Opyt sistematicheskogo izlozheniya. Puti Evrazii. Russkaya intelligentsiya i sud’by Rossii [Eurasianism. The experience of systematic exposition. Ways of Eurasia. Russian intelligencia and the fate of Russia]. Moscow: Russkaya kniga; 1992. 429 p. Russian.
  11. Vernadsky GV. Nachertanie russkoi istorii. Chast’ 1 [The inscription of Russian history. Part 1]. Prague: Evraziiskoe knigoizdatel’stvo; 1927. 264 p. Russian.
  12. Gumilev LN. Otkrytie Khazarii [Discovery of the Khazars]. Moscow: Iris Press; 2004. 200 p. Russian.
  13. Gumilev LN. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli [Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth]. Saint Petersburg: Crystal; 2001. 400 p. Russian.
  14. Gumilev LN. Ot Rusi do Rossii: ocherki etnicheskoi istorii [From Rus to Russia: Essays on ethnic history]. Moscow: Iris Press; 2015. 576 p. Russian.
  15. Gumilev LN. Drevnyaya Rus’ i Velikaya step’ [Ancient Russia and the Great steppe]. Moscow: Astrel’; 2012. 839 p. Russian.
  16. Laruelle M. [When intellectual property is appropriated, or On the opposite of L. N. Gumilev and P. N. Savitskii]. Vestnik Evrazii. 2001;4:5–19. Russian.
  17. Dugin AG. Geopolitika postmoderna [Post-modern geopolitics]. Saint Petersburg: Amphora; 2007. 382 p. Russian.
  18. Dugin A. The fourth political theory. Berwich-Upon-Tweed: Arktos; 2012. 214 p.
  19. Dugin AG. Evraziiskii revansh Rossii [Russia’s Eurasian revenge]. Moscow: Algorithm; 2014. 256 p. Russian.
  20. Laruelle M. [(Neo)Eurasians and politics: «entering» into government agencies and indifference to public opinion?]. Vestnik Evrazii. 2006;1:30–43. Russian.
  21. Hahn Ch. A concept of Eurasia. Current Anthropology. 2016;1(57):1–10.
  22. McNeill WH. The rise of the West. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1963. 880 p.
  23. Hodgson MGS. The venture of Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1974. 469 p.
  24. Arnason JP. State formation and empire building 500–1500. In: Kedar BZ, Wiesner-Hanks ME, editors. The Cambridge World History. Volume 5. Expanding webs of exchange and conflict, 500 CE – 1500 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 483–512.
  25. Hann Ch. Сomments. Current Anthropology. 2016;1(57):10–27.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

Issue

No. 3 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

To Know so that to Foresee...

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Šubrt, J. and Šulc, I. 2020. The Eurasianism concept: Russian vs Western perspectives. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 3 (Sep. 2020), 42–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-3-42-48.