Rating system as an element of human resource management at tertiary level

Authors

  • Tatiana A. Bogush Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 5 Kastryčnickaja Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus
  • Svetlana E. Selverstova Bialystok University of Technology, 45A Wiejska Street, Bialystok 15-351, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-5727
  • Ekaterina G. Maksimuk Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 5 Kastryčnickaja Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-2439

Keywords:

tertiary level, rating system, contract, transformation processes, rating of department, human resources, individual rating, human resource management, tools rating, base knowledge economy

Abstract

The article describes the functioning of the rating system in the Republic of Belarus, the Russian Federation and in a number of European countries such as Poland, Portugal, Spain, where rating systems have been developed taking into account regional and national characteristics of the traditions of higher education. The authors, relying on the materials of international forums on higher education, discovered a number of patterns that broaden the understanding of the rating and the peculiarities of its functioning in various educational centers of European countries, as well as in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation. The Lisbon strategy also continued deepening into the practice of focusing on the base knowledge economy, where a decisive place is given to optimizing the human resources of higher education institutions in training highly qualified specialists for such an economy.

Author Biographies

  • Tatiana A. Bogush, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 5 Kastryčnickaja Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus

    PhD (sociology); associate professor at the department of sociology and special sociological disci­plines, faculty of history, communication and tourism.

  • Svetlana E. Selverstova, Bialystok University of Technology, 45A Wiejska Street, Bialystok 15-351, Poland

    professor at the Forest Institute, faculty of construction and environment.

  • Ekaterina G. Maksimuk, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 5 Kastryčnickaja Street, Hrodna 230023, Belarus

    master’s degree student at the department of sociology and special sociological disciplines, faculty of history, communication and tourism.

References

  1. Kucherov DG. Strategic human resource management: origin and formation of the concept. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 8. Menedzhment. 2014;1:98–116. Russian.
  2. Fitz-Enz J. Rentowność inwestycji w kapitał ludzki. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna; 2001. 287 s.
  3. Bartnicki M. Pomiar kapitału intelektualnego. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa. 2000;11:12–15.
  4. Szopik-Depczyńska K, Korzeniewicz W. Kapitał ludzki w modelu wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Studia i prace Wydziału nauk ekonomicznych i zarządzania. 2011;24:177–204.
  5. Łukasiewicz G. Kapitał ludzki w organizacji opartej na wiedzy – wyzwania dla sprawozdawczości. Zeszyty Naukowe. 2005;3:189–203.
  6. Caparrós-Ruiz A. Time to the doctorate and research career: some evidence from Spain. Research in Higher Education. 2019;60(1):111–133. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-018-9506-2.
  7. Sánchez-Chaparro T, Gómez-Frías V, González-Benito Ó. Competitive implications of quality assurance processes in higher education. The case of higher education in engineering in France. Ekonomska Istrazivanja. 2019;33(4):1–19. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1697329.
  8. Kuritsyn SK. [Personnel development management in pedagogical university]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2016;50(part 1):123–130. Russian.
  9. Kuznetsova AA, Nikishina VB. Stimulation through motivation of professional activity of teachers-function of management of educational institution. Innov: elektronnyi naucnyi zhurnal [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 October 10];4:1–11. Russian.
  10. Trapitsyn SYu. [System of quality assessment of university teaching staff activity]. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo univeriteta. 2007;6:11–66. Russian.
  11. Rusanova AA. Transformation of university in innovative processes of institute of higher education. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. 2011;4:88–92. Russian.
  12. Jelonek M, Skrzyńska J. Jakość kształcenia w szkolnictwie wyższym. W: Przybylski W, Rudnicki S, Szwed A, redaktorzy. Ewaluacja jakości dydaktyki w szkolnictwie wyższym. Metody, narzędzia, dobre praktyki. Kraków: Wyższa szkoła Europiejska imienia księdza Józefa Tischniera; 2010. s. 11–35.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-28

Issue

No. 4 (2020): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

To Know so that to Foresee...

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Bogush, T.A. et al. 2020. Rating system as an element of human resource management at tertiary level. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Dec. 2020), 71–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2020-4-71-78.