Convergence of network and digital socio-political processes in modern Belarusian society

Authors

  • Evgenii M. Babosov Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus
  • Yuliya L. Bankouskaya Belarusian State Agrarian Technical University, 99 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220023, Belarus

Keywords:

network structures, network interaction, digitalisation, interaction, networks, society

Abstract

The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the network approach. The purpose of the article is to clarify the qualitative and specific features of the networking and digitalisation. The positive and destructive characteristics of the information and communication technologies development is characterised in the article. It is analysed the level of their influence on all spheres of Belarusian society life. The essential and specific characteristics of network structures. Clarification of its qualitative features such as decentralisation, the prevalence of horizontal connections in relation to vertical ones, flexibility, variability, mediation, the predominance of informal relationships over formal ones, contribute to the disclosure of network processes as a multifunctional and universal phenomenon that transforms the sphere of people’s social interaction and has a systemic impact on social processes. Networks modify traditional values and norms, transform the already established system of interaction of subjects, acting as a dynamically developing social phenomenon. The introduction of digital technologies contributes, on the one hand, to the formation of economic development new forms, the expansion of opportunities for scientific research, the creation of civil mechanisms for participation in the political life of the state, their involvement in the process of discussing existing problems, the rapid dissemination of information, the increase in opportunities for the introduction of innovative technologies in all spheres of society, the creation of new conditions for a dynamic response to changes and difficulties arising in the social system, the formation of adaptation mechanisms in relation to the environment. On the other hand, it promotes to the emergence of cybercrime and network conflicts involving huge masses of people in the zone of confrontation. The processes of networking and digitalisation create conditions for rapid response to changes taking place in society, prompt detection of new problems, contribute to the elaboration of alternative ways of social development. The results of the study can be applied as a way for optimising the existing network mechanisms of subjects’ interaction.

Author Biographies

  • Evgenii M. Babosov, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Surhanava Street, 2 building, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, doctor of scienсe (philosophy), full professor; chief researcher

  • Yuliya L. Bankouskaya, Belarusian State Agrarian Technical University, 99 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220023, Belarus

    PhD (philosophy), docent; associate professor at the department of social and humanitarian disciplines, faculty of engineering and technology

References

  1. Shentseva EA. Network approach: origins and prospects. Idea and ideals. 2012;2(12):48–57. Russian.
  2. Castels M, Kiseleva E. Russia and the network society. Analytical research. Universe of Russia. 2000;1:23–51. Russian.
  3. Castels M. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976. 564 p. Russian edition: Castels M. Vlast’ kommunikatsii. Chernykh AI, editor; Tylevich NM, translator. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2016. 564 p.
  4. Knoke D. Playing well together. Creating corporate social capital in strategic alliance networks. American Behavioural Scientist. 2009;52:1690–1708.
  5. Knoke D. Political networks: the structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 290 p.
  6. Marsden PV. Network diversity, substructures and opportunities for contact. In: Blau PM, Calhoun CJ, Meyer MW, Scott WR. Structures of power and constraint: papers in honor of Peter Blau. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 397–410.
  7. Berdnik EA. [Network culture as an object of sociological analysis]. SOCIOPROSTIR: the Interdisciplinary Collection of Scientific Papers on Sociology and Social Work. 2011;2:51–55. Russian.
  8. Smorgunov LV. [Network methodology of policy research]. Politicheskii analiz. 2001;2:97–117. Russian.
  9. Lepskii VE. Metodologicheskii i filosofskii analiz razvitiya problematiki upravleniya [Methodological and philosophical analysis of the development of management issues]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr; 2019. 340 p. Russian.
  10. Halin VG, Chernova GV. Digitalisation and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Management consulting. 2018;10:46–63. Russian. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-46-63.
  11. Krylova IA. [Information and psychological warfare as a factor of disintegration processes in the modern world]. Bol’shaya Evraziya: pazvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo. 2021;4–1:106–110. Russian.
  12. Mikhaylova OV. How are power positions on the state actors in networks are possible, or «Cheshire cat governance strategy». Human. Community. Management. 2016;17(4):6–18. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-14

How to Cite

[1]
Babosov, E.M. and Bankouskaya, Y.L. 2022. Convergence of network and digital socio-political processes in modern Belarusian society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2 (Jun. 2022), 4–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-2-4-10.