Social consequences of the education digital transformation in the conditions of the coronacrisis

Authors

  • Anatoly G. Davidovsky Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, 6 P. Broŭki Street, Minsk 220013, Belarus
  • Natalya V. Lapitskaya Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, 6 P. Broŭki Street, Minsk 220013, Belarus

Keywords:

COVID-19, coronacrisis, scenario approach, distance learning, digital transformation of education, correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, social consequences

Abstract

A bioinspired quasi-molecular scenario analysis algorithm has been developed, on the basis of which seven scenarios of the social consequences of the digital transformation of education, as well as five scenarios of the development of the social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, have been proposed. The scenario approach is an effective tool for system analysis and forecasting of various variants of social activity of Internet users in the conditions of the coronacrisis.

Author Biographies

  • Anatoly G. Davidovsky, Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, 6 P. Broŭki Street, Minsk 220013, Belarus

    PhD (biology), docent; associate professor at the department of software for information technologies, faculty of computer systems and networks

  • Natalya V. Lapitskaya, Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, 6 P. Broŭki Street, Minsk 220013, Belarus

    PhD (engineering), docent; head of the department of software for information technologies, faculty of computer systems and networks

References

  1. Androutsos A, Brinia V. Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Education Sciences. 2019;9(2):113. DOI: 10.3390/educsci9020113.
  2. Vlachopoulos D. COVID-19: threat or opportunity for online education? Higher Learning Research Communications. 2020;10(1):16–19. DOI: 10.18870/hlrc.v10i1.1179.
  3. Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Kaynak O, Yang Shi, Shein Yin. Industrial cyberphysical systems: a backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2017.2648857.
  4. Craig E, Georgieva M. VR and AR: designing spaces for immersive learning [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 July 31]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2017/10/vr-and-ar-designing-spaces-for-immersive-learning.
  5. Craig E, Georgieva M. AR and VR in STEM: the new frontiers in science [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 August 2]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2017/8/ar-and-vr-in-stem-the-new-frontiers-in-science.
  6. Craig E, Georgieva M. Designing immersive learning and storytelling experiences with 360° video [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 June 6]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2019/1/designing-immersive-learning-and-storytelling-experiences-with-360-video.
  7. Abad-Segura E, González-Zamar MD. Análisis de las competencias en la educación superior a través de flipped classroom. Revista Iberoamericana de Educació. 2019;80(2):29–45. DOI: 10.35362/rie8023407.
  8. Abad-Segura E, Cortés-García FJ, Belmonte-Ureña LJ. The sustainable approach to corporate social responsibility: a global analysis and future trends. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5382. DOI: 10.3390/su11195382.
  9. Newbold P, Carlson WL, Thorne BM. Statistics for business and economics. 8th edition. London: Pearson; 2013. 793 p.
  10. Forman J. Data smart. Using data science to transform information into insight. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013. 432 p. Russian edition: Forman J. Mnogo tsifr. Analiz bol’shikh dannykh pri pomoshchi Excel. 2nd edition. Sokolova A, translator. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher; 2019. 464 p.
  11. Siegel AF. Prakticheskaya biznes-statistika [Practical business statistics]. 4th edition. Moroz AI, translator. Moscow: Vil’yams; 2002. 1056 p. Russian.
  12. van Notten Ph. Writing on the wall: scenario development in times of discontinuity. Florida: Boca Raton; 2005. 209 p.
  13. Pereverza TV. [Scenario approach in the analysis of complex social systems]. System research and information technologies. 2011;1:133–143. Russian.
  14. Bova VV, Gladkov LA, Kravchenko YuA, Kureichik VV, Kureichik VM, Shcheglov SN. Tekhnologii intellektual’nogo analiza i izvlecheniya dannykh na osnove printsipov evolyutsionnogo modelirovaniya [Data mining and extraction technologies based on the principles of evolutionary modeling]. Taganrog: Technological Institute «Southern Federal University»; 2009. 124 p. Russian.
  15. Gladkov LA, Kureichik VV, Kureichik VM, Lebedev BK, Lebedev OB, Sorokoletov PV. Metody i algoritmy prinyatiya reshenii na osnove bionicheskogo poiska. Taganrog: Technological Institute «Southern Federal University»; 2009. 137 p. Russian.
  16. Taleb NN. The Black Swan. The impact of the highly improbable. New-York: Random House Publishing Group; 2010. 444 p. Russian edition: Taleb NN. Chernyi lebed’. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti. Vozdvizhenskaya A, Makarova M, editors; Son’kin V, Berdichevskii A, Kostionova M, Popov O, translators. Moscow: Kolibri; 2011. 528 p.
  17. Pomerantz J, Rode R. Exploring the future of extended reality in higher education [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 June 6]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/6/exploring-the-future-of-extended-reality-in-higher-education.
  18. Davidovsky AG, Pishchova AV. [Analysis of the development prospects of the biodigital university model 4.0]. Journal of international science center «Society 2035». 2020;1(1):72–83. Russian.
  19. Neborskiy EV. Reconstruction of the university model: transition to the 4.0 forma. Mir nauki [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 May 17];5(4). Available from: http://mir-nauki.сom/PDF/26PDMN417.pdf. Russian.
  20. Nechaev VD, Durneva EE. «Digital generation»: psychology and pedagogical research of a problem. Pedagogika. 2016;1:36–45. Russian.
  21. Lumpieva TP, Volkov AF. [Generation Z: psychological characteristics of modern students]. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 July 31]. Available from: https://studylib.ru/doc/2363335/pokolenie-z--psihologicheskie-osobennosti-sovremennyh. Russian.
  22. Okladnikova EA. Education by 2030 and 2035: foresight technologies and teleology of risks and benefits. Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities. 2021;7:3:125–149. Russian. DOI: 10.18413/2408-932X-2021-7-3-0-12.
  23. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: about МООCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons. 2016;59(4):441–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008.
  24. Siemens G. Massive open online courses: innovation in education. In: McGreal R, Kinuthia W, Marshall S, editors. Open educational resources: innovation, research and practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning; 2013. p. 5–16.
  25. Eschenbrenner B, Nah F-H. Learning through mobile devices: leveraging affordances as facilitators of engagement. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2019;13(2):152–170. DOI: 10.1504/IJMLO.2019.098193.
  26. Weiyu Wang, Keng Siau. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, robotics, future of work, and future of humanity: a review and research agenda. Journal of Database Management. 2019;30:61–79. DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2019010104.
  27. Nah F F-H, Siau K. COVID-19 pandemic – role of technology in transforming business to the new normal. In: Bertino E, Wen Gao, Steffen B, Moti Yung, editors. Lecture notes in computer science; 2020. p. 585–600.
  28. Hill C, Lawton W. Universities, the digital divide and global inequality. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2018;40(6):598–610. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2018.1531211.
  29. Türkeli S, Schophuizen M. Decomposing the complexity of value: integration of digital transformation of education with circular economy transition. Social Sciences.2019;8(8):243. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8080243.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-29

How to Cite

[1]
Davidovsky, A.G. and Lapitskaya, N.V. 2022. Social consequences of the education digital transformation in the conditions of the coronacrisis. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2 (Jun. 2022), 56–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-2-56-65.