Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems: the postmodern character of society’s descriptors

Authors

  • Kirill V. Sevastov National Institute for Higher Education, 15 Maskoŭskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

Keywords:

theory of social systems, postmodernism, postmodern society, hierarchy, antiform, subjectless sociology, communication, the death of the author, the death of the subject, truth, knowledge

Abstract

The article carried out a comparative analysis of the basic provisions of the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann and the principles of the philosophy of postmodernism. Considering the categorical apparatus of N. Luhmann’s concept, the author finds points of semantic intersection with a number of key concepts of modern social philosophy, as well as mutual resonation of basic principles. The article proves that the comparison of the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann and the philosophy of postmodernism can be carried out according to several criteria: subjective (general scope of research), historical (common time and context of occurrence) and meaningful (when the perspective of consideration is shifted, it becomes possible to identify semantic parallels named theories). Thus, the article draws a parallel between N. Luhmann’s subjectless sociology and the postmodern concept of the absent subject. In accordance with the theory of social systems by N. Luhmann, the subject is non-communicative by definition. In the conceptual apparatus of the philosophy of postmodernism, a meaningfully similar rejection of the interpretation of the subject in its classical sense is fundamental. A meaningful connection between the concept of binary truth by N. Luhmann, on the one hand, and the subjectivist theory of truth in postmodernism, on the other hand, is revealed. Thus, the truth in the context of N. Luhmann’s social system depends on its relevance for the individual, fitting into the system of knowledge that is significant for him at the moment, the truth is modeled in a non-static context and can be re-evaluated in a subjective way, depending on the shift in the focus of the relevance of one or another fragment of knowledge of the individual. Similarly, in postmodern philosophy there is a subjectivisation of truth, which turns out to be a variable not only in the socio-cultural frame of reference, but also in the frame of reference of the individual. Thus, the article proves that there are semantic parallels in the theory of social systems of N. Luhmann and postmodern philosophy, which allow us to say that, independently of each other, N. Luhmann, on the one hand, and postmodern authors, on the other, develop a new vision of cognitive processes within the post-non-classical type of rationality.

Author Biography

  • Kirill V. Sevastov, National Institute for Higher Education, 15 Maskoŭskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of philosophy and methodology of university education, faculty of advanced training and retraining

References

  1. Parsons T. [Social systems]. Nauchnyi al’manakh Instituta filosofii RAN. Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii. 2008;2(1):38–71. Russian.
  2. Luhmann N. Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme; 2002. 347 S. Russian edition: Luhmann N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu. Timofeeva K, translator. Moscow: Logos; 2007. 360 p.
  3. Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1984. 675 S. Russian edition: Luhmann N. Sotsial’nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii. Gaziev ID, translator; Golovin NA, editor. Saint Petersburg: Nauka; 2007. 648 p.
  4. Nazarchuk AV. Teoriya kommunikatsii v sovremennoi filosofii [Theory of communication in contemporary philosophy]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya; 2009. 320 p. Russian.
  5. Nazarchuk AV. Uchenie Niklasa Lumana o kommunikatsii [Niklas Luhmann’s teaching on communication]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir; 2012. 248 p. Russian.
  6. Hassan I. The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1987. 267 p.
  7. Luhmann N. Macht. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius; 1988. [256 S.]. Russian edition: Luhmann N. Vlast’. Antonovskii AYu, translator. Moscow: Praksis; 2001. 256 p.
  8. Luhmann N. Die Realität der Massenmedien. Wiesbaden: GWV Fachverlage Gmbh; 2004. [256 S.]. Russian edition: Luhmann N. Real’nost’ massmedia. Antonovskii AYu, translator. Moscow: Praksis; 2005. 256 p.
  9. Luhmann N. [What is communication?]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1995;3:114–124. Russian.
  10. Barthes R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Kosikov GK, Karumov BP, Zenkina SN, Kozlov SL, Bazhenova NA, translators. Moscow: Progress; 1989. 616 p. Russian.
  11. Baudrillard J. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert’ [Symbolic exchange and death]. Zenkina SN, translator. Moscow: Dobrosvet; 2011. 392 p.
  12. Baudrillard J. Le système des objets. Paris: Gallimard; 1991. 288 p. Russian edition: Baudrillard J. Sistema veshchei. Zenkina SN, translator. Moscow: Rudomino; 1999. 224 p.
  13. Foucault M. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard; 1969. 289 p. Russian edition: Foucault M. Arkheologiya znaniya. Rakova MB, Serebryannikova AYu, translators. Saint Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya akademiya; 2004. 416 p.
  14. Foucault M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Supervise and punish. Birth of the prison]. Naumov V, translator. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999. 480 p.
  15. Luhmann N. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1993. 732 S. Russian edition: Luhmann N. Istina, znanie, nauka kak sistema. Antonovskii AYu, translator. Moscow: Logos; 2016. 410 p.
  16. Qvortrup L. Society’s educational system – an introduction to Niklas Luhmann’s pedagogical theory. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning. 2005;1:2–21.
  17. Foucault M. Fearless speech. J. Pearson, editor. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e); 2001. 128 p. Russian edition: Foucault M. Diskurs i istina. Korbut MA, translator. Minsk: Propilei; 2006. 152 p.
  18. Lyotard J-F. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les editions de minuit; 1979. 109 p. Russian edition: Lyotard J-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. Shmatko NA, translator. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 1998. 160 p.
  19. Kakutani M. The death of truth. New York: Crown Publishing Group; 2018. 208 p. Russian edition: Kakutani M. Smert’ pravdy. Summ LB, translator. Moscow: Eksmo; 2019. 256 p.
  20. Luhmann N. Why does society describe itself as postmodern? Cultural Critique. 1995;30:171–186. DOI: 10.2307/1354436.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

Issue

No. 4 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

To Know so that to Foresee...

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Sevastov, K.V. 2022. Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems: the postmodern character of society’s descriptors. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Dec. 2022), 42–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-4-42-47.