Creation of marginal problems in various knowledge branches as an indicator of growing austerity of lifeworld of personality and society

Authors

  • Vyacheslav K. Shcherbin The Center of System Analysis and Strategic Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Akademicheskaya street, 1, 220072, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

Keywords:

marginal problems, limits and borders of scientific knowledge, society of risk, crisis’s society, horrorology, riskology, risk-management, crisis’s management, sociology of risk, sociology of life, eventology, existential science, «economy of quick responce», limitology, crisis humanities

Abstract

The creation of a new type of problems (marginal problems) in different branches of scientific knowledge etc., including fundamental scientific problems (S. G. Kara-Murza), difficult problems (A. Asimov), psychological problems (C. G. Jung), complicated problems (M. I. Demchuk, A. T. Yurkevich), existential problems and eternal problems (V. Danchenko), moral problems (H. Lacey, B. G. Yudin), meta-problems of epoch (L. Mlodinov) is considered in the article. The possibilities of interdisciplinary research (synergetics, systemology and science of science) for solving the above mentioned marginal problems are analyzed. The conclusion is substantiated about the presence of strong correlation between the growing actuality of marginal problems and the growing austerity of lifeworld of personality and society.

Author Biography

  • Vyacheslav K. Shcherbin, The Center of System Analysis and Strategic Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Akademicheskaya street, 1, 220072, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

    PhD (philology); head of the sector of branch innovative development

References

  1. Vallerstain I. [The end of the world as we know it: social science for the twenty-first century]. Moscow, 2004 (in Russ.).
  2. Dobrov G. M. [Kaputology, or applied systemic analysis of failures]. Dobrov Gennadij Myhajlovych (1929–1989): collection. 2nd ed. Kiev, 2004. P. 81–127 (in Russ).
  3. Grinberg R. S. [Crisis and ways of its overcoming]. Analiticheskie doklady pobeditelei konkursa «Rossiya v usloviyakh mirovogo krizisa». Moscow, 2009. P. 70–94 (in Russ.).
  4. Bush V. Science and endless frontier. Washington, 1945.
  5. Pechenkin A. A. [Introduction]. Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki: znanie, ratsional’nost’, tsennosti v trudakh myslitelei Zapada. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1996. P. 5–17 (in Russ.).
  6. Danchenko V. [On the approaches to the Lokajata Yoga (evolution of consciousness in the documents: part II)]. URL: www.psylib.org.ua/books/danch01/107/index.htm (date of access: 06.02.2017) (in Russ.).
  7. Smirnova R. A. [Phenomenologic sociology]. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. Minsk, 2003. P. 340 (in Russ.).
  8. Abel’s Kh. [Interaction, identity, presentation. introduction to the interpretative sociology]. Saint Petersburg, 2000 (in Russ.).
  9. Titarenko L. G. [Lifeworld]. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. Minsk, 2003. P. 96 (in Russ.).
  10. Shavel S. A. Ways to mysteries of being: formation of scientific direction (meditations over the monograph of Zh. T. Toshchenko «Sociology of Life». Sociologiya. 2016. No. 4. P. 123–130 (in Russ.).
  11. Danilov A. N. [Sociology of Life]. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. Minsk, 2003. P. 307–308 (in Russ.).
  12. Dokuchaev I. I. [Transgression and reduction: ways of integration of social sciences, humanities and culturology]. Vopr. kul’turologii. 2001. No. 7. P. 4–9 (in Russ.).
  13. Reznik Yu. M. [Ways of system reorganization and integration of social knowledge (essays on the fate of Russian social science). Essay 3. Branches of systemic integration of social sciences)]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. 2000. Vol. II, issue 3. P. 53–85 (in Russ.).
  14. Begel’sdeik Sh., Maseland R. [Culture in economics: history, methodological reflections and contemporary applications]. Moscow ; Saint Petersburg, 2016 (in Russ.).
  15. Hrenov N. A. Culturology as the «Russian science»: localization or universalization of the culturological space? Vopr. kulturologii. 2012. No. 5. P. 4–9 (in Russ.).
  16. Kara-Murza S. G. [Crisis social science]. Moscow, 2011 (in Russ.).
  17. Azimov A. [Foundation. First trilogy. Science fiction novels]. Moscow, 2006 (in Russ.).
  18. Horgan J. [The end of science. Facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the Scientific Age]. Saint Petersburg, 2001 (in Russ.).
  19. Yung K. G. [Modernity and future]. Minsk, 1992 (in Russ.).
  20. Demchuk M. I., Yurkevich A. T. [Republic of Belarus: system principles of sustainable development]. Minsk, 2003 (in Russ.).
  21. Kolesnikov A., Sirenko S. [Institutional basics of constructive interaction of science, society and state in opposing the crisis phenomenon]. Otnoshenie obshchestva i gosudarstva k nauke v usloviyakh sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh krizisov: tendentsii, modeli, poisk putei uluchsheniya vzaimodeistviya : materialy mezhdunar. simpoziuma (Kiev, 2–5 June, 2013). Kiev, 2013. P. 335–339 (in Russ.).
  22. Leisi Kh. [Svobodna li nauka ot tsennostei? Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding]. Moscow, 2001 (in Russ.).
  23. Yudin B. G. [In the focus of research – a man: ethical regulations of scientific cognition]. Etnos nauki. Moscow, 2008. P. 361–383 (in Russ.).
  24. Mlodinov L. [The upright thinkers. The human journey from living in trees to understanding the cosmos]. Moscow, 2016 (in Russ).
  25. Myasnikov A. G. Duginers! Halt! One-Two! Vestn. Ross. filos. obshchestva. 2015. No. 4. P. 122–125 (in Russ.).
  26. Degtyarev A. P. [Limits of man’s cognition, or Why the time flows. The logic of the world]. URL: www.d21.chat.ru/predely.htm (date of access: 9.02.2017) (in Russ.).
  27. Kroche B. Theory and history of historiography. Moscow, 1998 (in Russ.).
  28. Novikov N. V. [Social limit]. Rossiiskaya sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. Moscow, 1998 (in Russ.).
  29. Balog A. [Is sociology a multiparadigmal science?]. Sotsiologicheskie issled. 2002. No. 7. P. 22–31 (in Russ.).
  30. Lo Dzh. After method: mess in social science research. Moscow, 2015 (in Russ.).
  31. Bogushevich D. G. [Linguistics before new horizons]. Sovremennye inostrannye yazyki: problemy funktsionirovaniya i prepodavaniya : materialy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchn.-pract. conf. (Mozyr, 7 Okt., 2011). Mozyr, 2011. P. 12–13 (in Russ.).
  32. Starostin G. [Serious preface]. K istokam yazykovogo raznoobraziya. Desyat’ besed o sravnitel’no-istoricheskom yazykoznanii s E. Ya. Satanovskim. Moscow, 2016. P. 12–14 (in Russ.).
  33. Epshtein M. [Space character: on the future of humanities]. Moscow, 2004 (in Russ.).
  34. Yatsenko N. E. [Explanatory dictionary of social sciences terms]. Saint Petersburg, 1999 (in Russ.).
  35. Smagulova R. I. [Risk management]. Pavlodar, 2006 (in Russ.).
  36. Kas’yanov A. A. [Dictionary-reference book of the manager: the basic management concepts in the state, social-economic and political life]. Rostov-on-Don, 2007 (in Russ.).
  37. Sharkov F. I. [Communicology]. Moscow, 2009 (in Russ.).
  38. Ismailov A. A. [Sociology of risk: making decisions in the conditions of risk]. Vestn. MGIMO. 2010. No. 4. P. 277–285 (in Russ.).
  39. Markova V. D., Kuznetsova S. A. [Strategic management: notions, concepts, instruments of making decisions]. Novosibirsk, 2010 (in Russ.).
  40. Malinetskii G. G., Podlazov A. V., Kuznetsov I. V. [On the national system of scientific monitoring]. Budushchee i nastoyashchee Rossii v zerkale sinergetiki. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2011. P. 133–165 (in Russ.).
  41. Toffler A. [Future shock]. Saint Petersburg, 1997 (in Russ.).
  42. Kurinov S. M. [Risk-oriented strategy of innovative development of organizations of telecommunicational branch] : dissertatsiya kandidata ekon. nauk : 08.00.05. Moscow, 2016 (in Russ.).
  43. Vorobiev Yu. L. (ed.) [Strategic risks of Russia: estimation and prognosis]. Moscow, 2005 (in Russ.).
  44. Matyushevskaya V. K. (ed.) [World economics]. Minsk, 2005 (in Russ.).
  45. Shelestova D. A. [Risks of monetary operations of multinational companies in globalized economy]. Filos. sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii. 2016. No. 1–2. P. 101–106 (in Russ.).
  46. Grinspen A. [The map and the territory. Risk, human nature and the future of forecasting]. Moscow, 2015 (in Russ.).
  47. Zheltonoga L. [Coming to the surface is putting off]. Director. 2016. No. 12. P. 16–17 (in Russ.).
  48. Kolesnikova T. A. [The anti-crisis management of risk society: synergetic concept]. Moscow, 2009 (in Russ.).
  49. Malinetskii G. G. [Planning of the future and the modernization of Russia]. Budushchee i nastoyashchee Rossii v zerkale sinergetiki. Moscow, 2011. P. 271–300 (in Russ.).
  50. Sadovskii V. N. [A system approach and general theory of systems: status, main problems and perspectives of development]. Sistemnye issledovaniya. Metodologicheskie problemy. Moscow, 1980. P. 29–54 (in Russ.).
  51. Surmin Yu. P. [Theory of systems and systemic analysis]. Kiev, 2003 (in Russ.).
  52. Senchagov V., Pobyvaev S., Solov’ev A. [Estimation of global risk’s influence as an instrument of russian economical strategy formation: indicative approach]. Econ. Strateg. 2016. No. 8. P. 24–31 (in Russ.).
  53. Isakov V. B. [Gulliver and lilliputians]. Evropeiskoe izmerenie 2015 : collection of scientific works. Moscow, 2015. P. 28–58 (in Russ.).
  54. Polterovich V. M. [Formation of the general social analysis]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2011. No. 2. P. 101–111 (in Russ.).
  55. Mikulinskii S. (ed.) Osnovy naukovedeniya. Moscow, 1985 (in Russ.).
  56. Shcherbin V. K. [The main form of the scientific self-knowledge]. Nauka i innovatsii. 2014. No. 1. P. 12–15 (in Russ.).
  57. Rakitov A. I. [The new science of science – to a new science (from paradigm to sintagm)]. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya : sci. proc. Moscow, 2003. P. 6–30 (in Russ.).
  58. Kara-Murza S. G. [The Social Functions of Science in the Conditions of Crisis]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2003. No. 4. P. 45–63 (in Russ.).
  59. Yakunin V. I., Bagdasaryan V. E., Sulakshin S. S. [The new technologies of struggle against the russian state system]. monograph. Moscow, 2009 (in Russ.).
  60. Kiyashchenko L. P., Mirskaya E. Z. [Introduction. Ethos of science in the age of changes: philosophy, sociology, ethics]. Etos nauki. Moscow, 2008. P. 7–17 (in Russ.).
  61. Yudin B. G. [The ethical component in the scientific research of man]. Nauka Rossii. Ot nastoyashchego k budushchemu. Moscow, 2009. P. 452–465 (in Russ.).
  62. Petrov M. K. [Self-consciousness and scientific creation]. Rostov-on-Don, 1992 (in Russ.).
  63. Yurevich A. V. [Social psychology of science]. Saint Petersburg, 2001 (in Russ.).

Downloads

Published

2019-03-06

Issue

No. 1 (2017): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

To Know so that to Foresee...

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Shcherbin, V.K. 2019. Creation of marginal problems in various knowledge branches as an indicator of growing austerity of lifeworld of personality and society. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 1 (Mar. 2019), 19–35.