Designing new types of integration spaces and Belarusian strategic initiatives

Authors

  • Vyacheslav K. Shcherbin The Center of System Analysis and Strategic Research, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Akademičnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus

Keywords:

concept of space, spatial turn in modern science, integration spaces of new types, Belarusian strategic initiatives

Abstract

The article analyses the conceptual content of the concept «space», the widespread use of which in different fields of scientific knowledge is the most obvious indication of «spatial turn», which was outlined in science in the late 1980s. The necessity of designing the new types of integration spaces, the main economic resource of which is the latest scientific knowledge, is justified. Creation of the new types of integration spaces may be a basis of some Belarusian strategic initiatives.

Author Biography

  • Vyacheslav K. Shcherbin, The Center of System Analysis and Strategic Research, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1 Akademičnaja Street, Minsk 220072, Belarus

    PhD (philology); head of the sector of macroeconomic risks research

References

  1. Bekker K. Slovarʼ takticheskoi realʼnosti. Kulʼturnaya intelligentsiya i sotsialʼnyi kontrolʼ [Dictionary of tactical reality. сultural intelligentsia and social control]. Moscow : Ul’tra Kul’tura, 2004 (in Russ.).
  2. Strezhneva M. S. (ed.) Transnatsionalʼnye politicheskie prostranstva: yavlenie i praktika [Transnational political spaces: phenomenon and practice]. Moscow : Ves’ mir, 2011 (in Russ.).
  3. Vaganov A. G. [Western investments and the structure of Russian science]. Naukovedenie [Sci. of sci.]. 2001. No. 3. P. 84–91 (in Russ.).
  4. Ushkalov I. G., Malakha I. A. [Interstate migration of scientific personnel and problems of the development of scientifictechnical potential of Russia]. Naukovedenie [Sci. of sci.]. 1999. No. 1. P. 20–35 (in Russ.).
  5. Balykin S. [Integral is being prepared for sale]. Direktor [Director]. 2008. No. 1. P. 21 (in Russ.).
  6. Geyetz V.M. [Postcrisis architectonics of European economic space]. Mir peremen [World of сhanges]. 2011. No. 1. P. 137–151 (in Russ.).
  7. Krasina O. [Designing of transnational space as a theoretic-methodological problem in the modern theory of the world policy]. Vlastʼ [Power]. 2010. No. 11. P. 69–74 (in Russ.).
  8. Mitsos A. [European strategy towards knowledge-based economy and society]. In: Obshchestvo, osnovannoe na znaniyakh: novye vyzovy nauke i uchenym [Knowledge-based society: new challenges for science and scientists] : mater. of Int. conf. (Kyiv, 23–25 Novemb., 2005). Kyiv, 2006. P. 51–56 (in Russ.).
  9. Isakova N. B. [Webization of the innovative space and the transfer of technologies]. Probl. nauki [Probl. of sci.]. 2009. No. 10. P. 2–6 (in Russ.).
  10. Malitsky B. A. [How to assess the contribution and authority of a scientist?]. Naukovedenie [Sci. of sci.]. 2012. No. 3. P. 162–163 (in Ukrainian).
  11. Onopriyenko V. I., Onopriyenko M. V. [Internet-galaxy and science in a globilized world]. Naukovedenie [Sci. of sci.]. 2008. No. 1. P. 166–168 (in Russ.).
  12. [The Address of the President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to the Parliament]. URL: www.president.gov.by/press29160.html (date of access: 10.02.2018) (in Russ.).
  13. Tsepkalo V., Starzhynski V., Pavlova O. [The leading cluster of the IT-industry]. Nauka i innovatsii [Sci. & innov.]. 2013. No. 4. P. 52–56 (in Russ.).
  14. Vardomski L. B., Shurubovich A. V. [Post-Soviet integration projects as a factor of modernization of economies of the CIS’ states]. In: Integratsiya nauki kak faktor stroitel’stva Soyuznogo gosudarstva [Integration of science as a factor of building the union state] : a sci. mater. of Inter-acad. council on the probl. of develop. of the Union State. Minsk, 2011. Issue 3. P. 21–39 (in Russ.).
  15. Roman O. V., Ilyushchenko A. F., Vityaz’ S. P. (eds). P. A. Vityazʼ – putʼ v nauke [P. A. Vityaz’ – a path in science]. Minsk : Belarus. navuka, 2006 (in Russ.).
  16. Ayres R. Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe prognozirovanie i dolgosrochnoe planirovanie [Technological forecasting and longrange planning]. Moscow : Mir, 1971 (in Russ.).
  17. Kustarev A. [Science and Politics]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [The inviolable reserve]. 2008. No. 6. P. 3–9 (in Russ.).
  18. Shmatko N. A. [The Horizons of Socioanalysis]. In: Sotsioanaliz Pʼera Burdʼe [Socioanalysis of Pierre Bourdieu]. Moscow ; Saint Petersburg, 2001. P. 13–46 (in Russ.).
  19. Kaganski V. L. [Russia – USSR Today? Comparative portrait of spaces. Article 3. The State of Russian Federation and Russian space]. Obshchestv. nauki i sovremennostʼ [Humanities and modernity]. 2005. No. 4. P. 100–112 (in Russ.).
  20. Mirski E. M., Barbot’ko L. M., Borisov V. V. [A scientific policy of the XXI century: trends, reference points and mechanisms]. URL: www.courier.com.ru/top/cras.htm (date of access: 10.02.2018) (in Russ.).
  21. Selieu G. Ot mechty k otkrytiyu: kak statʼ uchenym [From dream to discovery. How to become a scientist]. Moscow : Progress, 1987 (in Russ.).

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12

How to Cite

[1]
Shcherbin, V.K. 2019. Designing new types of integration spaces and Belarusian strategic initiatives. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 1 (Mar. 2019), 41–46.