Post-globalization and prospects of social development

Authors

Keywords:

social development, post-globalization, augmented modernity
Supporting Agencies
The article is a result of the research supported by Russian Science Foundation (project No. 18-18- 00132).

Abstract

The article presents a new approach to measure level of social development for societies facing the post-globalization as globalizing networks and flows paradoxically are localized in super-urban areas where people experience borderless, multicultural, and mobile social life in the regime of augmented modernity. In the post-globalization age, the ‘core’ of socioeconomic order is dispersed into networks of enclaves of augmented modernity contrasting with exhausted modernity outside them. The nations’ prospects of social development depend on number, size, and influence of cosmopolitan superurban areas attracting and generating transnational material, human, and symbolic flows.

Author Biography

  • Dmitry V. Ivanov, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia

    doctor of sociology; professor at the department of theory and history of sociology, faculty of sociology

References

  1. Wallerstein I. World-system analysis: an introduction. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004. 128 p.
  2. Arrighi G. Global capitalism and the persistence of the North-South divide. Science & Society. 2001;65(4):469–476.
  3. Sassen S. The global city: introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2005;11(2):27–43.
  4. Khanna P. Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization. New York: Random House; 2016. 496 p.
  5. United Nations. World urbanization prospects. New York: UN DESA; 2014.
  6. Istrate E, Nadeau CA. The brookings institution. Global metro monitor 2012: slowdown, recovery, and interdependence. Washington: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings; 2012. 50 p.
  7. Bouchet M, Liu S, Parilla J, Kabbani N. The brookings institution. Global metro monitor 2018. Washington: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings; 2018. 46 p.
  8. Dobbs R, Smit S, Remes J, Manyika J, Roxburgh Ch, Restrepo A. Urban world: mapping the economic power of cities. [S. l.]: McKinsey Global Institute; 2011. 62 p.
  9. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1994. 164 p.
  10. Lyotard, J.-F. The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Bennington G, Massumi B, translators. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1984. 144 p.
  11. Ivanov DV. New configurations of inequality and flow structures of glam-capitalism. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016;6:13–23. Russian.
  12. Ivanov DV. To the theory of flow structures. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012;4:8–16. Russian.
  13. United Nations. Urbanization and development: emerging futures. World cities report 2016. Nairobi: UN-Habitat; 2016.
  14. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990. 188 p.
  15. Robertson R. Globalization: social theory and global culture. London: SAGE Publications; 1992. 211 p.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-03

How to Cite

[1]
Ivanov, D.V. 2020. Post-globalization and prospects of social development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Jan. 2020), 14–20.