Demographic dynamics of the Belarusian-Russian border regions
Keywords:
border regions of Russia and Belarus, demographic dynamics, integrated demographic indicators, depopulation, life expectancy at birth, efficiency of migration movement of the populationAbstract
The article deals with the demographic dynamics of the border regions of the Russia and Belarus. The article compares trends in population changes in the border Belarusian (Vitebsk, Gomel and Mogilev) and Russian (Bryansk, Pskov and Smolensk) regions over periods of 1959–1989 and 1989–2019. A comparison of the levels of life expectancy of the population at birth in these regions is given. The characteristics of the depopulation coefficient, as well as the effectiveness of the migration movement of the population are given. Their analysis revealed a higher level of demographic dynamics in the Belarusian border regions compared to the Russian regions. However, in general, the demographic dynamics of both Belarusian and Russian regions are characterised by depopulation trends that are typical of other regions with Slavic populations.
References
- Rybakovsky LL, Kozhevnikova NI. Regional differentiation of demographic processes. Social and Labor Research. 2020;40(3):8–17. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2020-40-3-8-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)