Means of communication of new religious movements in the Republic of Belarus

Authors

Keywords:

means of communication, new religious movements, printed media, leaflets, unconventional religiosity, documentary analysis

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of the means of communication of new religious movements in the Republic of Belarus. Due to the high level of closeness of the overwhelming number of new religions for questioning, interviews, observation and experiment, their means of communication with society are the most accessible documentary source of primary sociological information for research. As part of the monitoring of the confessional space of the country, conducted since 1997, information was collected on 1113 new religious movements. The means of communication used by them to broadcast religious ideas and teachings, including in the public space of the Republic of Belarus, are documented. A number of methodological problems related to the analysis of the means of communication of new religious movements are identified. The frequency of appeals of new religions to print media, the Internet, leaflets, books and specialised periodicals has been established. The entire set of means, depending on the target audience, is divided into internal, external and universal. The degree of informativeness of external and universal means of communication for scientific analysis, is analysed. It is noted that the openness of the new religious movements to society, which implies the disclosure of a significant part of their internal information, does not automatically mean recognition and acceptance of society, readiness for a constructive dialogue with it. The connection between the type of structure of the new religious movements and the number of different means of communication used by them is revealed. The minimum provable number of new religious movements working in the public space through means of communication accessible to the general population has been established.

Author Biography

  • Vladimir A. Martinovich, Minsk Theological Academy, 27 Zybiсkaja Street, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (theology), PhD (sociology); head of the department of apologetics

References

  1. Barker E. Novye religioznye dvizheniya [New religious movements]. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Russkogo khristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta; 1997. 284 p. Russian.
  2. Beckford JA, editor. New religious movements and rapid social change. London: SAGE; 1986. 247 p.
  3. Robbins T, Anthony D. New religious movements and the social system. Integration, disintegration, or transformation. The Annual Review of the Social Sciences of Religion. 1978;2:1–28.
  4. Stark R, Bainbridge WS. Religion, deviance, & social control. New York: Routledge; 1997. 205 p.
  5. Lewis JR. Legitimating new religions. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 2003. 256 p.
  6. Wilson BR. A typology of sects. In: Bocock R, Thompson K, editors. Religion and ideology. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1985. p. 297–311.
  7. Metraux AD. Aum Shinrikyo’s impact on Japanese society. New York: Edwin Mellen Press; 2000. 165 p.
  8. Carter LF. Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 316 p.
  9. McLuhan M. Ponimanie media. Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding media: the extensions of man]. Moscow: Kanon-press-Ts; 2003. 464 p. Russian.
  10. Martinovich VA. Methodological problems in monitoring new religious movements. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016;6:56–65. Russian.
  11. Martinovich VA. Methodological problems in identifying the documents of new religious movements. Scientific Result. Sociology and Management. 2016;2(4):52–62. Russian.
  12. Martinovich VA. Advertising new religious movements in print media. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2019;3:17–24. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-08

How to Cite

[1]
Martinovich, V.A. 2021. Means of communication of new religious movements in the Republic of Belarus. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 3 (Oct. 2021), 75–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2021-3-75-83.