Language of web: bynet discourse and Belarusian netspeak
Keywords:
Internet communication, web language, written language, verbal speech, language corpus, abbreviations, neologisms, acronyms, backronyms, syngrahemics, supragrahemics, interlanguage hybrids, literary norm, linguistic usus, representation of language in cultureAbstract
It is proved that the modern Internet space creates a fundamentally new communication environment (social networks, chats, etc.), the capabilities of which, in turn, act as a trigger for linguistic transformations. It is the language of Internet communications that is today the field where new trends in language development are most actively formed. The functioning of the language in the network gives rise to a number of new phenomena. So, Internet discourse gives rise to such phenomena as massive abbreviations and an abundance of neologisms (including game ones), acronyms and backronyms, syngrahemics and supragrahemics, interlanguage hybrids, new tools for expressing subject-subject relations (formulas of politeness, for example) and many others. This poses new problems for both linguistics and philosophy of language. For example, it is shown that in the context of Internet communications, the classic dichotomy of verbal speech and written forms of language is blurred: on the one hand, in chats and forums, the language is formally represented by written texts, on the other – interactive dialogues actually set living one-time communication, which allows one to speak simultaneously, interrupt the interlocutor, respond immediately, etc., and all these are characteristic of verbal speech. It is concluded that if until now the main presenter of language in culture has clearly been fiction as embodying the established norm of the correct language, then today language practices (usus) come to the fore, reflecting the trends of linguistic evolution that are forming in the present continuous, that sets a new accentuation in modern culture, namely the prevalence of descriptive linguistics over prescriptive.
References
- Leontovich OA. [Computer discourse: linguistic personality in the virtual world]. In: Karasik VI, Slyshkin GG, editors. Yazykovaya lichnost’: institutsional’nyi i personal’nyi diskurs [Linguistic personality: institutional and personal discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena; 2000. p. 24–31. Russian.
- Atabekova AA. Lingvisticheskii dizain web-stranits (sopostavitel’nyi analiz yazykovogo oformleniya anglo- i russkoyazychnykh web-stranits) [Linguistic design of web-pages (comparative analysis of the language design of English- and Russian-language web-pages)]. Moscow: RUDN University; 2003. 202 p. Russian.
- Chahowski GK. [Internet speech as a means of communication]. In: Prygodzich MR, editor. Belaruskae slova: tjermin i vobraz; zbornik artykulaw pa matjeryjalah navukovyh chytannjaw, prysvechanyh pamjaci prafesara V. P. Krasneja; 27 snezhnja 2017 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Belarusian word: term and image; a collection of articles on the materials of scientific readings dedicated to the memory of Professor V. P. Krasney; 2017 December 27; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2018 p. 119–210. Belarusian.
- Bjalova KA. [Linguistic features of the Belarusian Internet discourse]. Belaruskaja lingvistyka. 2010;65:104–110. Belarusian.
- Knobel M, Lankshear C, editors. A new literacies sampler. Bern: Peter Lang; 2007. 251 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 29).
- Fiorentini I, Marino G. New literacies and linguistic innovation. The case of Internet memes. In: Kohlberger M, Kloekhorst A, editors. 48th Annual meeting of the societas linguistica Europaea: book of abstracts; 2015 September 2–5; Leiden, Netherlands. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics; 2015. p. 52–53.
- Knobel M, Lankshear C, editors. Researching new literacies: design, theory, and data in sociocultural investigation. Bern: Peter Lang; 2017. 254 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies. Volume 76).
- Kupiainen R. Media and digital liceraties in secondary school. Bern: Peter Lang; 2013. 160 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 59).
- Pandya JZ. Exploring critical digital literacy practices: everyday video in a dual language context. New York: Routledge; 2019. 128 p. (Expanding literacies in education).
- Hagood MC. New literacies practices: designing literacy learning. Bern: Peter Lang; 2009. 186 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 37).
- Alvermann DE, editor. Adolescents’ online literacies: connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture. Bern: Peter Lang; 2016. 232 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 75).
- Warner J. Adolescents’ new literacies with and through mobile phones. Bern: Peter Lang; 2017. 198 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 79).
- Luke A. Foreword. In: Pandya JZ. Exploring critical digital literacy practices: everyday video in a dual language context. Milton Park: Routledge; 2019. p. X–XIV (Expanding literacies in education).
- Lankshear C, Knobel M, editors. A new literacies reader: educational perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang; 2013. 384 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 66).
- Knobel M, Kalman J, editors. New Literacies and teacher learning: professional development and the digital turn. Bern: Peter Lang; 2016. 262 p. (New literacies and digital epistemologies; volume 74).
- Vazhnik S. [Belarusian language on the Internet]. Acta Neophilologica. 2006;8:79–89. Belarusian.
- Avrorin VA. Problemy izucheniya funktsional’noi storony yazyka: k voprosu o predmete sotsiolingvistiki [Problems of studying the functional side of language: to the question of the subject of sociolinguistics]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1975. 274 с. Russian.
- Shcherba LV. [On the issue of bilingualism]. In: Shcherba LV. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ [Language system and speech activity]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1974. p. 313–318. Russian.
- Haugen E. [Linguistics and language planning]. In: Chemodanov NS, editor. Novoe v lingvistike. Vypusk VII. Sociolingvistika [New in linguistics. Volume VII. Sociolinguistics]. Moscow: Progress; 1975. p. 441–472. Russian.
- Sovpel IV. [Linguistic resources of the Belarusian language and their applications]. In: Kruchkow S, compiler. Belaruskaja mova, intjernet i kamp’jutjer: matjeryjaly kruglaga stala mizhnarodnaga simpoziuma «Raznastajnasc’ mow i kul’tur u kantjeksce glabalizacyi»; 20 maja 2002 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Belarusian language, the Internet and the computer: materials of the discussion at the international symposium «Diversity of languages and cultures in the context of globalisation»; 2002 May 20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belaruski sacyjal’na-jekalagichny sajuz «Charnobyl’»; 2002. р. 7–15. Russian.
- Vakhek I, Dubskii I. Lingvisticheskii slovar’ Prazhskoi shkoly [Linguistic dictionary of the Prague school]. Moscow: Progress; 1964. 352 с. Russian.
- Korzhinek YM. [On the question of language and speech]. In: Kondrashov NA, editor-compiler. Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok: sbornik statei [Prague linguistic circle: collection of articles]. Moscow: Progress; 1967. p. 317–324. Russian.
- Shcherba LV. [About further indivisible units of language: from the linguistic heritage of L. V. Shcherba]. Questions of linguistics. 1962;2:99–101. Russian.
- Balamut NG. [Language of the Belarusian Internet space]. In: Mihnevich AJa, editor. Pracy kafedry suchasnaj belaruskaj movy. Vypusk 12 [Proceedings of the department of modern Belarusian language. Volume 12]. Minsk: Republican Institute of Higher School; 2013. p. 20–25. Belarusian.
- Kolesnik NG. [New trends in the development of functional styles in the Russian language (based on the language of the blogosphere)]. In: Bitkeeva AN, Mikhal’chenko VYu, editors. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Yazykovaya politika i yazykovye konflikty v sovremennom mire»; 16–19 sentyabrya 2014 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [International conference «Language policy and language conflicts in the modern world»; 2014 September 16–19; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2014. p. 375–384. Russian.
- Plungyan VA. [For what is the National Corpus of the Russian language needed? Informal introduction]. In: Plungyan VA, editor. Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka: 2003–2005 [National corpus of the Russian language: 2003–2005]. Moscow: Indrik; 2005. p. 6–20. Russian.
- Boeva-Omelechko NB. The observer’s paradox [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2021 October 10]. Available from: https://www.psyoffice.ru/6-1068--paradoks-nablyudatelja.htm. Russian.
- Somin AA. [Linguistic reflection in modern Belarus through the prism of comments in online media]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Yazykoznanie. Kul’turologiya. 2015;1:62–86. Russian.
- Sheigal EI. [Computer jargon as a linguocultural phenomenon]. In: Karasik VI, editor. Yazykovaya lichnost’: kul’turnye kontsepty [Linguistic personality: cultural concepts]. Volgograd: Peremena; 1996. p. 47–51. Russian.
- Ivanov LYu. [Language in electronic means of communication]. In: Ivanov LYu, Skovorodnikov AP, Shiryaev EN, editors. Kul’tura russkoi rechi: entsiklopedicheskii slovar’-spravochnik [The culture of Russian speech: encyclopedic reference dictionary]. Moscow: Nauka; 2011. p. 791–793. Co-published by the «Flinta». Russian.
- Goroshko EI. [Theoretical analysis of Internet genres: to the description of the problem area]. In: Dement’ev VV, editor. Zhanry rechi. Vypusk 5. Zhanr i kul’tura [Genres of speech. Volume 5. Genre and culture]. Saratov: Saratov State University; 2007. p. 22–27. Russian.
- Barkovich AA. [Belarusian texts corpus: Internet discourse]. Vesnik BDU. Seryja 4, Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 2013;2:26–29. Belarusian.
- Shupa S. Software localisation in Belarus: Belarusian computer and Internet terminology [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2021 October 25]. Available from: http://pravapis.org/art_software_localization.asp. Belarusian.
- Zinder LR. [Introduction to the theory of writing]. In: Gerd AS, editor. Prikladnoe yazykoznanie [Applied linguistics]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University; 1996. p. 15–25. Russian.
- Ovchinnikova IG. Characteristics of the principles of Russian orthography from the standpoint of speech activity [Internet; cited 2021 October 25]. Available from: http://philolog.pspu.ru/module/magazine/do/mpub_4_79. Russian.
- Zappavigna M. Discourse of Twitter and social media: how we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC – Continuum; 2012. 240 p. (Continuum discourse; book 6).
- Vazhnik SA. Try styhii bajnjeta, abo prajava nacyjanal’naj mownaj samaidjentyfikacyi [Three elements of baynet, or a manifestation of national linguistic self-identification]. Minsk: Prava i jekanomika; 2007. 55 p. Belarusian.
- Brown P, Levinson SC. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. 345 p. (Studies in interactional sociolinguistics; issue 4).
- Khazanova MI. [Some features of the Ukrainian language on the Internet: the problem of politeness]. In: Zhuravlev AF, Anan’eva NE, editors. Sovremennaya slavistika i nauchnoe nasledie S. B. Bernshteina: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii 15–17 marta 2011 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Modern Slavic studies and scientific heritage of S. B. Bernstein: abstracts of the International scientific conference; 2011 March 15–17; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2011. p. 350–352. Russian.
- Amzin A, Belkin I. Full hello. Internet slang is increasingly going beyond the virtual space [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2021 October 20]. Available from: https://lenta.ru/articles/2006/02/28/preved/. Russian.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)