How to measure educational environment of university?

Authors

Keywords:

university educational environment, measure and evaluation of educational environment, subject-subject relations, DREEM (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) questionnaire, descriptive statistics

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of evaluating the educational environment of a higher educational institution. The issue is of actual character since an optimal educational environment is one of the conditions for training competitive and competent specialists. University educational environment is specific as it purposefully affects the future specialist’s professional and personal development, ensures his readiness for professional activity, successful fulfillment of social roles and self-realisation in the process of life. In the article the educational environment of university is considered from the viewpoint of a competency-based approach wherein the subject-subject relations (teacher-student activity), educational goals and learning outcomes are treated as elements of the educational environment. Due to the fact that there are a few native methods of evaluating the educational environment of university, the DREEM methodology (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) developed by the University of Dundee (UK) in 1997 and actively used by foreign medical universities is suggested to consider. A valid tool for evaluation is the DREEM questionnaire with the aim to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the university educational environment. Although the DREEM questionnaire requires some adjustment in terms of taking into account the realities of the national system of higher education, fields of training and the like, wordings of its questions are quite universal that makes it possible to use the given toolkit to evaluate the educational environment of Belarusian higher educational institutions training specialists in various fields.

Author Biography

  • Valentina A. Simkhovich, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

    doctor of science (sociology), full professor; professor at the department of economic sociology and psychology of entrepreneurship, Institute of Social Science and Humanities Education

References

  1. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2021 November 20];27(1):27–52. DOI: 10.1080/03075070120099359. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225083767_University_Students’_Perceptions_of_the_Learning_Environment_and_Academic_Outcomes_Implications_for_Theory_and_Practice.
  2. Audin K, Davy J, Barkham M. University Quality of Life and Learning (UNIQoLL): an approach to student wellbeing, satisfaction and institutional change. Journal of Further and Higher Education [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2021 November 20];27(4):365–382. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000128073.
  3. Mayya SS, Roff S. Students’ perceptions of educational environment: a comparison of academic achievers and under-achievers at Kasturba Medical College, India. Education for Health (Abingdon) [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2021 November 20];17(3):280–291. DOI: 10.1080/13576280400002445. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15848815/.
  4. Shcherbakova TN. To the issue of the structure of educational environment of learning institutions. Molodoi uchenyi [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 November 15];5(40):545–548. Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/40/4867/. Russian.
  5. Tarasov SV. [Educational environment: concept, structure, typology]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina. 2011;3(3):133–138. Russian.
  6. Yasvin VA. Obrazovatel’naya sreda: ot modelirovaniya k proektirovaniyu [Educational environment: from modelling to designing]. Мoscow: Smysl; 2001. 365 p. Russian.
  7. Vasilyeva EJ. Educational environment in university as object of management and evaluation. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2011;(4):76-82. Russian.
  8. Gushchina TN. [Pedagogical essence of the phenomenon of «educational environment»: based on research materials]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana). 2011;4:187–190. Russian.
  9. Panov VI. Psikhodidaktika obrazovatel’nykh sistem: teoriya i praktika [Psycho-didactics of educational systems: theory and practice]. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2007. 352 p. Russian.
  10. Novikov VN. Educational environment of higher educational institution must be professionally and personally stimulating. Psychological Science and Education. 2012;1:1–8. Russian.
  11. Bratko MV. [Educational environment of higher education institution: functional aspect]. Pedagogichnyj proces: teorija i praktyka. 2015;1–2(46–47):11–18. Ukrainian.
  12. Slobodchikov VI. [On the concept of educational environment in the conception of developmental education]. In: Panov VI, editor. Tezisy Vtoroi rossiiskoi konferentsii po ekologicheskoi psikhologii; 12–14 aprelya 2000 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Abstracts of the Second Russian conference on environmental psychology; 2000 April 12–14; Moscow, Russia)]. Мoscow: Ekopsitsentr ROSS; 2000. p. 172–176. Russian.
  13. Leont’eva OV. [Cultural and educational environment of higher education institution as psychological and pedagogical issue]. Obrazovanie i obshchestvo. 2009;6:106–111. Russian.
  14. Yasvin VA. Shkol’naya sreda kak predmet izmereniya: ekspertiza, proektirovanie, upravlenie [School environment as subject of measurement: expertise, design, management]. Мoscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie; 2019. 448 p. Russian.
  15. Barsukova EM, Belolutskaya AK, Ivanova EV, Le-van TN, Shmis TG, Ustinova MA, et al. Formirovanie sovremennoi obrazovatel’noi sredy [Formation of modern educational environment]. Мoscow: Мoscow City Pedagogical University; 2019. 57 p. Russian.
  16. Sorokova MG, Odintsova MA, Radchikova NP. Scale for Assessing University Digital Educational Environment (AUDEE Scale). Psychological Science and Education. 2021;26(2):52–65. DOI:10.17759/pse.2021260205. Russian.
  17. Miles S, Swift L, Leinster SJ. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM): a review of its adoption and use. Medical Teacher. 2012;9(34):620–634. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668625. Russian edition: Miles S, Swift L, Leinster SJ. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM): a review of its adoption and use. Avakyan EI, translator. Medical Education and Professional Development. 2020;11(2):150–174.
  18. Kasimovskaya NA, Cabrera ET, Poleschuk IA, Geras’kina NS. Assessing the educational environment in pursuing a bachelor’s degree in «nursing» by using Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical Education and Professional Development. 2020;11(3):194–204. Russian. DOI: 10.24411/2220-8453-2020-13017.
  19. Asmita AP, Vijaya LC. Students’ perception of the educational environment in medical college: a study based on DREEM questionnaire. Korean Journal of Medical Education [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 October 12];28(3):281–288. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2016.32. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27363503/.
  20. Dreyer A, Gibbs A, Smally S. Clinical Associate students’ perception of the educational environment at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 October 12];7(1):1–8. DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.778. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564909/.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-17

Issue

No. 1 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

From the Working Table of a Sociologist

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Simkhovich, V.A. 2022. How to measure educational environment of university?. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 1 (Mar. 2022), 88–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-1-88-95.